Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This monocentric observational cohort study compares conventional instrumentation, patient-specific instrumentation, and augmented reality navigation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. The primary objective is to assess the accuracy of glenoid component positioning based on postoperative CT data. Secondary objectives include evaluation of functional outcomes and clinical performance at mid-term follow-up. Patients who underwent surgery between 2021 and 2024 are followed up clinically at 2 years postoperatively.
This study investigates the accuracy and clinical relevance of different planning and implementation techniques in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Patients treated at a single orthopedic center between 2021 and 2024 were included. Three established surgical approaches were analyzed: conventional instrumentation, patient-specific instrumentation, and augmented reality navigation.
Initial data collection included retrospective and prospective assessment of preoperative planning parameters and their intraoperative implementation. Postoperative evaluation included low-dose CT imaging to assess glenoid component positioning accuracy.
The current phase of the study focuses on long-term clinical outcomes, with a standardized 2-year follow-up including clinical examination and validated functional outcome scores. No additional imaging is performed as part of the follow-up phase.
Patients were not randomized; group allocation reflects the surgical technique used at the time of treatment.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional Instrumentation | Patients who underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using conventional surgical techniques. | ||
| Patient-Specific Instrumentation | Patients who underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using patient-specific instrumentation based on preoperative planning. | ||
| Augmented Reality Navigation | Patients who underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using augmented reality-assisted navigation (NEXTAR system). |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy of Glenoid Component Positioning | Comparison of preoperative planning parameters with postoperative CT-based measurements of glenoid component positioning, including inclination, version, implant size, and screw placement. | up to 2years postoperatively |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Constant-Murley Score (Constant Score) | The Constant Score is a comprehensive shoulder function assessment. The total score ranges from 0 to 100 points. Higher scores indicate better shoulder performance and function; lower scores indicate greater functional impairment and symptoms. | 2 years postoperatively |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients who underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty at a single tertiary orthopedic center (Ordensklinikum Linz - Barmherzige Schwestern, Austria) between 2021 and 2024. The study population includes individuals treated using conventional instrumentation, patient-specific instrumentation, or augmented reality navigation as part of routine clinical care. Only patients with available preoperative planning data and postoperative CT imaging, as well as those eligible for clinical follow-up, were included. All participants are invited for a standardized clinical and functional assessment at 2 years postoperatively.
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ordensklinikum Linz - Barmherzige Schwestern | Linz | 4020 | Austria |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) |
Shoulder pain and function will be assessed using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score. The total score ranges from 0 to 100 points. Higher scores indicate less pain and better shoulder function. |
| 2 years postoperatively |
| Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (DASH) | The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score measures disability and symptoms affecting the upper extremity, including the arm, shoulder, and hand. The total score ranges from 0 to 100 points. Lower scores indicate better upper-limb function and fewer symptoms; higher scores indicate greater disability and functional limitations. | 2 years postoperatively |
| Complications and Revision Surgery | Occurrence of complications or revision procedures. | Up to 2 years postoperatively |