Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Radical cystectomy remains the standard curative-intent treatment for most patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer, but it is associated with significant morbidity and long-term quality-of-life implications. Trimodality therapy is an accepted standard-of-care alternative for carefully selected patients who wish to preserve their bladder; however, optimal patient selection remains challenging.
The combination of enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab (EV-P) has demonstrated remarkable activity in urothelial carcinoma, including in the perioperative setting, with pathologic complete response rates of approximately 50-60%. These results generate the hypothesis that a subset of patients may achieve sufficiently deep responses to allow selective deferral of cystectomy. Cohort A of this trial prospectively evaluates the use of multimodal response assessment (pelvic MRI and TURBT, ctDNA) to guide individualized decisions regarding cystectomy versus bladder preservation.
Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) remains the standard curative-intent treatment for high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), but recurrence rates after surgery alone are high. Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy improves pathologic outcomes and is supported by phase II data, but its delivery is constrained by baseline renal dysfunction and the further decline in glomerular filtration that follows RNU - historically, only about 20% of patients remain cisplatin-eligible postoperatively, which is the principal rationale for delivering platinum in the neoadjuvant rather than adjuvant setting. A large fraction of patients with UTUC are cisplatin-ineligible at baseline, and no level 1 evidence supports a specific neoadjuvant regimen in this population.
EV-P is not constrained by renal function and has produced unprecedented activity in urothelial carcinoma. In the EV-302 upper tract subgroup, EV-P achieved an objective response rate of 67.7% and a complete response rate of 28.6%, with survival benefit preserved relative to platinum-based chemotherapy. In the perioperative bladder cancer setting, EV-P has yielded pathologic complete response rates of approximately 50-60%. However, available data on EV-P in UTUC are restricted to the metastatic setting, and prospective evaluation in the neoadjuvant setting is lacking. Cohort B of this trial addresses this gap by prospectively evaluating neoadjuvant EV-P followed by RNU in patients with high-risk UTUC, with pathologic complete response as the primary endpoint.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A (neoadjuvant EV-P + response-adapted management) | Experimental | Following neoadjuvant EV-P, participants in this cohort will have response-adapted management based on if they achieved a composite clinical complete response (cCR) to determine the next step in their treatment on this study. A participant has achieved cCR if ALL the following are met:
If a participant achieves cCR, they will have a choice between:
If a participant does not achieve cCR, they will have cystectomy. |
|
| Cohort B (neoadjuvant EV-P + surgery + adjuvant EV-P) | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab (EV/P) | Drug | Participants in both cohorts will first receive neoadjuvant enfortumab vedotin + pembrolizumab (EV-P) for 4 cycles. Each cycle is 21 days. Participants will be given 1.25 mg/kg enfortumab vedotin intravenously on days 1 and 8 and 200 mg pembrolizumab intravenously on day 1 of each cycle. Participants in Cohort A may then choose to receive 5 more cycles of EV-P followed by pembrolizumab alone to complete 1 year of study therapy if they have a composite complete clinical response. Participants in Cohort B will then receive 5 more cycles of EV-P followed by pembrolizumab alone to complete 1 year of study therapy following their definitive surgery. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical complete response rate | Determine the percent of subjects in Cohort A that achieve a clinical complete response following completion of neoadjuvant EV-P. A clinical complete response is defined as having all three of the following:
| 3 weeks following completion of neoadjuvant therapy |
| Pathologic complete response rate | Determine the percent of subjects in Cohort B who achieve a pathologic complete response at the time of surgery. A pathologic complete response is defined as having disease staging of pT0N0 at time of surgery. | 8 weeks following completion of neoadjuvant therapy |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Event-free survival | Determine the event-free survival of patients in Cohort A at 1 year from the start of EV-P | 1 year from the start of EV-P |
| Event-free survival | Determine the event-free survival of patients in Cohort A at 2 years from the start of EV-P |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
For Cohort B, a clinical or pathological diagnosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma, with high-intermediate risk or higher per NCCN guidelines, planned for definitive surgery.
High-intermediate: High grade + Unifocal <1.5 cm
High: High grade + Multifocal or >1.5 cm or high-grade renal obstruction or invasion on axial imaging Any proportion of divergent differentiation is permitted across all histologies (except neuroendocrine - see exclusion criteria), as long as a urothelial component is identified.
Note: Subjects with a prior or concurrent malignancy whose natural history or treatment does not have the potential to interfere with the safety or efficacy assessment of the investigational regimen or primary endpoint (as determined by the treating physician) are eligible for this trial.
- Subjects of childbearing potential (SOCBP) must be using an adequate method of contraception to avoid pregnancy throughout the study and for at least 4 months after the last dose of EV-P to minimize the risk of pregnancy. Prior to study enrollment, subjects of childbearing potential must be advised of the importance of avoiding pregnancy during trial participation and the potential risk factors for an unintentional pregnancy.
SOCBP includes any subject who has experienced menarche and who has not undergone successful surgical sterilization (hysterectomy, bilateral tubal ligation, or bilateral oophorectomy) or who is not post-menopausal. Post-menopause is defined as:
Amenorrhea that has lasted for ≥ 12 consecutive months without another cause, or
For subjects with irregular menstrual periods who are taking hormone replacement therapy (HRT), a documented serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level of greater than 35 mIU/mL.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Daniel Araujo, MD | University of Florida | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002295 | Carcinoma, Transitional Cell |
| D001749 | Urinary Bladder Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002277 | Carcinoma |
| D009375 | Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C000632577 | enfortumab vedotin |
| C582435 | pembrolizumab |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| 2 years from the start of EV-P |
| Overall survival | Determine the overall survival of patients in Cohort A at 1 year from the start of EV-P | 1 year from the start of EV-P |
| Overall survival | Determine the overall survival of patients in Cohort A at 2 years from the start of EV-P | 2 years from the start of EV-P |
| Bladder-intact survival | Determine the bladder-intact survival of patients in Cohort A at 1 year from the start of EV-P | 1 year from the start of EV-P |
| Bladder-intact survival | Determine the bladder intact survival of patients in Cohort A at 2 years from the start of EV-P | 2 years from the start of EV-P |
| Pathological complete response | Determine number of subjects in cohort A who achieve a pathological complete response after first 4 cycles of EV-P. | After completion of first 4 cycles of EV-P (each cycle of EV-P is 21 days) |
| Pathologic downstaging | Determine number of patients in cohort A who achieve pathological downstaging (disease staging \ | At completion of first 4 cycles of EV-P (each cycle of EV-P is 21 days) |
| Event-free survival | Determine the event-free survival of patients in Cohort B at 2 years from the start of EV-P | 2 years from the start of EV-P |
| Overall survival | Determine the overall survival of patients in Cohort B at 2 years from the start of EV-P | 2 years from the start of EV-P |
| Pathologic downstaging | Determine number of patients in cohort B who achieve pathological downstaging (disease staging \ | At completion of first 4 cycles of EV-P (each cycle of EV-P is 21 days) |
| D014571 |
| Urologic Neoplasms |
| D014565 | Urogenital Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D052776 | Female Urogenital Diseases |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D001745 | Urinary Bladder Diseases |
| D014570 | Urologic Diseases |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |