This prospective comparative clinical study evaluated the accuracy and chairside time of complete-arch implant scans obtained using an intraoral photogrammetry system and a mobile-phone-based photogrammetry system in edentulous patients rehabilitated with complete-arch implant-supported prostheses. Implant positions recorded by each system were compared with a reference dataset to assess linear and angular discrepancies. The chairside time required for data acquisition was also measured. The study aimed to determine whether mobile-phone-based photogrammetry can provide clinically acceptable accuracy comparable to that of intraoral photogrammetry while improving clinical efficiency. The findings may help clinicians select appropriate digital impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation.

Accurate recording of implant positions is essential for the passive fit and long-term success of complete-arch implant-supported prostheses. Photogrammetry-based technologies have emerged as promising alternatives to conventional digital impression techniques for capturing implant positions with high accuracy. While intraoral photogrammetry systems have demonstrated favorable results, the clinical performance of recently introduced mobile-phone-based photogrammetry systems remains insufficiently investigated.

This prospective comparative clinical study aims to evaluate the accuracy and chairside time of complete-arch implant scans obtained using an intraoral photogrammetry system and a mobile-phone-based photogrammetry system in edentulous patients restored with complete-arch implant-supported prostheses. Each participant will undergo implant scanning using both systems according to the manufacturers' recommendations. The resulting digital datasets will be compared with a reference dataset to determine scan accuracy.

The primary outcome measures will be linear and angular discrepancies between the implant positions captured by each photogrammetry system and the reference dataset. Secondary outcome measures will include the chairside time required for scan acquisition. Statistical analyses will be performed to compare the accuracy and efficiency of the evaluated systems.

Inclusion Criteria:

• Adults aged 18 years or older.
• Completely edentulous patients rehabilitated with implant-supported complete-arch prostheses.
• Presence of at least four osseointegrated implants in the edentulous arch.
• Patients able to undergo digital implant scanning procedures.
• Patients willing to participate and provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients with unstable or failed implants.
• Presence of peri-implant disease, active oral infection, or significant soft-tissue inflammation around the implants.
• Inadequate access for placement of photogrammetry scan bodies or markers.
• Patients with conditions that prevent proper scanning procedures (e.g., inability to maintain mouth opening or remain still during data acquisition).
• Patients requiring immediate implant placement or immediate loading protocols.
• Patients unwilling or unable to provide informed consent.
• Incomplete clinical records or inability to complete all study procedures.

The study population will consist of adult completely edentulous patients who have been rehabilitated with implant-supported complete-arch prostheses. Eligible participants will present with a fully edentulous arch restored by at least four osseointegrated dental implants and will be recruited from patients seeking prosthodontic treatment and follow-up care at the study center. All participants will undergo complete-arch implant scanning using both an intraoral photogrammetry system and a mobile-phone-based photogrammetry system for comparative evaluation of scan accuracy and chairside acquisition time. Only patients meeting the predefined inclusion criteria and providing written informed consent will be enrolled.

Up on resonable request from the corresponding author