Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Aim of the Study The aim of this study is to compare between two forms of magnetic attachments in implant retained mandibular over-dentures.
Complete edentulism of the mandible is frequently associated with compromised denture retention and stability, which may negatively affect mastication, comfort, and patient satisfaction. Mandibular implant-supported overdentures retained by magnetic attachments have been introduced as a reliable treatment option to improve prosthesis retention and function.
Different magnetic attachment designs are available, including flat and dome-shaped configurations. The geometry of magnetic attachments may influence retentive behavior, stress distribution, and overdenture stability during function. However, clinical evidence comparing the retention performance of these attachment designs remains limited.
This randomized clinical trial will include 14 completely edentulous patients aged 50-65 years. All participants will receive two implants placed in the canine regions of the mandible using a fully guided surgical protocol. After a 3-month healing period, patients will be randomly allocated into two equal groups according to the magnetic attachment design used. Group I will receive flat magnetic attachments, while Group II will receive dome-shaped magnetic attachments.
The primary outcome measure will be overdenture retention evaluated using a digital force gauge. Retention measurements will be performed at the time of overdenture loading (baseline), after 3 months of functional use, and after 6 months of functional use. The results will be used to determine whether magnetic attachment design influences the retention of mandibular implant-supported overdentures.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flat Magnetic Attachment Group | Experimental | Participants received mandibular implant-supported overdentures retained by flat magnetic attachments. Two Dentium SuperLine implants were placed in the canine regions of the mandible, and flat magnetic attachments (MKP5530 keeper with MGT5520 magnetic assembly) were used for overdenture retention. |
|
| Dome Magnetic Attachment Group | Experimental | Participants received mandibular implant-supported overdentures retained by dome-shaped magnetic attachments. Two Dentium SuperLine implants were placed in the canine regions of the mandible, and dome magnetic attachments (MKP5530D keeper with MGT5520D magnetic assembly) were used for overdenture retention. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flat Magnetic Attachment | Device | Flat magnetic attachment system used for retention of mandibular implant-supported overdentures. The system consisted of a Dentium MKP5530 keeper and MGT5520 magnetic assembly with a manufacturer-reported retentive force of 700 gf. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overdenture Retention Force | Retention force of mandibular implant-supported overdentures retained by flat and dome-shaped magnetic attachments, measured in Newtons (N) using a digital force gauge during vertical dislodgement. | Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after overdenture loading |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| sawsan maged, Assoc. Prof. | Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University | Cairo | Egypt |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32128084 | Background | Song SY, Kang KH, Lee JY, Shin SW. Effects of type of magnet attachment and implant angulation in two implant overdenture models. J Adv Prosthodont. 2020 Feb;12(1):33-37. doi: 10.4047/jap.2020.12.1.33. Epub 2020 Feb 20. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two parallel groups according to the magnetic attachment design used for mandibular implant-supported overdentures. Group I will receive flat magnetic attachments, while Group II will receive dome-shaped magnetic attachments. Retention will be evaluated at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after overdenture loading.
Not provided
Not provided
This is an open-label study. Participants and investigators are aware of the magnetic attachment design used. Outcome assessment is based on objective retention measurements obtained using a digital force gauge.
Not provided
|
| Dome Magnetic Attachment | Device | Dome-shaped magnetic attachment system used for retention of mandibular implant-supported overdentures. The system consisted of a Dentium MKP5530D keeper and MGT5520D magnetic assembly with a manufacturer-reported retentive force of 700 gf. |
|
|