Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Qingdao Haier Biotech Co., LTD | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In this 24-week, single center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, the efficacy and safety of lyophilised oral fecal microbiota transplantation in patients with active refractory rheumatoid arthritis will be evaluated.
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease, characterized by synovium inflammation and bone and joint erosions, leading to pain, morbidity and increased motality. Nearly half of RA patients displayed incomplete response or intolerance to the anchor drug-methotrexate. Gut microbiota plays an important role in the pathophysiology of RA and abnormal gut microeology has been documented in RA. FMT(fecal microbiota transplantation) is the engraftment of gut microbiota from healthy donors into a recipient, to ideally restore the normal gut microbial community structure. Hopefully, FMT could act as a promising strategy to improve disease control in refractory RA. Oral lyophilised fecal microbiota capsule provides a readily accessible and non-invasive way for FMT. This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of lyophilised oral FMT in patients with active RA refractory to conventional synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs)with or without biological DMARDs (bDMARDs)or targeting-synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs).
Objectives:
To evaluate the efficacy of lyophilised oral FMT capsule in the treatment of active RA patients refractory to csDMARDs with or without bDMARDs or tsDMARDsï¼› To evaluate the safety of lyophilised oral FMT capsule in the treatment of active RA patients refractory to csDMARDs with or without bDMARDs or tsDMARDsï¼›
DESIGN
This is a Phase 2, randomized, 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, and 40 patients with active RA refractory to csDMARDs will be randomized in a 1:3 ratio to one of the following 2 parallel treatment arms:
Placebo group: taking placebo capsules with no microbiota inside and continue previous csDMARDs regimen simutaneouslyï¼› FMT group: taking lyophilised oral capsules with faecal microbiota prepared from health donors and continue previous csDMARDs regimen simutaneouslyï¼›
Placebo capsules were indistinguishable from FMT capsules by appearance and were stored in identical coded package.
Disease activity and safety profile were evaluated at 8 weeks, 16 weeks and 24 weeks.
Escape:
On week 16, all participants with no response, defined as a <20% improvement in TJC (tender joint count), SJC (swollen joint count) and CRP (C-reactive protein) from baseline can withdraw and switch to other treatment like biologics.
Endpoints :
Primary endpoint:
ACR 20/50 response rates at 16 weeks.
Secondary endpoint:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| FMT group | Experimental | Participants of this group will take lyophilised oral capsules with faecal microbiota prepared from health donors; previous csDMARDs regimen will continue simutaneously. |
|
| Placebo group | Placebo Comparator | Participants in this group will take placebo capsules with no microbiota inside; previous csDMARDs regimen will continue simutaneously. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| lyophilised oral capsules with faecal microbiota | Drug | Faecal microbiota is extracted from fresh stool collected from strictly screened health donors with canonical procedure, and then lyophilised and prepared into oral capsule. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| ACR 20/50 response rates at 16 weeks | at week 16, the difference in ratio of participants who achieve ACR 20/50 response in two groups. | week 16 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| ACR70 response at 16 weeks | at week 16 and week 24, the difference in ratio of participants who achieve ACR 70 response in two groups. | week 16 |
| ACR20/50/70 response at 24 weeks | at week 24, the difference in ratio of participants who achieve ACR 20/50/70 response in two groups. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
8. Other conditions that investigators consider inappropriate for this study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lidan Zhao | Contact | 13810700035 | zhaolidan@hotmail.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Lidan Zhao | Peking Union Medical College Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peking Union Medical College Hospital | Beijing | Beijing Municipality | 100730 | China |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001172 | Arthritis, Rheumatoid |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo capsules | Drug | placebo capsules with the same appearance as FMT capsules but no microbiota inside |
|
| week 24 |
| DAS 28 (CRP) and DAS 28 (ESR) at 16 and 24 weeks | at week 16 and week 24, the difference of diease activity evaluated by DAS 28 (CRP) and DAS 28 (ESR) in two groups | week 16 and week 24 |
| EULAR response rates at 16 and 24 weeks; | at week 16 and week 24, the difference of EULAR response evaluated based on DAS 28 (CRP) or DAS 28 (ESR) in two groups | week 16 and week 24 |
| Health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) at 16 and 24 weeks; | at week 16 and week 24, Health assessment questionnaire were evaluated and the change from baseline will be compared between two groups | week 16 and week 24 |
| Patient assessment of pain (visual analogue scale,VAS)at 16 and 24 weeks; | at week 16 and week 24, pain levels (VAS) of participants were compared between two groups | week 16 and week 24 |
| Patient and physician global assessment (PtGA and PhGA) at 16 and 24 weeks; | at week 16 and week 24, global assessment from participants and from care providers will compared between two groups | week 16 and week 24 |
| D003240 |
| Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D001327 | Autoimmune Diseases |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |