Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-525069-65-00 | EU Trial (CTIS) Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Up to 40% of individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD) experience depression, which increases the risk of early relapse. Depression can cause relapse to occur 3 times faster in individuals with AUD who experience depressive symptoms at discharge. No treatments have been approved for individuals with both AUD and depression. Psilocybin, a psychedelic, shows promising results in treating both depression and addiction. It may be particularly effective for preventing relapse in people with AUD who also have depressive symptoms after detoxification, offering quicker action than traditional antidepressants.
The Psilocybin Alcohol Depression (PAD) pilot study, launched in February 2024, has provided critical insights for avoiding methodological flaws and demonstrated that psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy (PAP) is both feasible and acceptable. Preliminary efficacy analyses were conducted: at 12 weeks, the 25 mg group showed significantly greater reductions in drinking days (p = 0.038) and craving frequency (p = 0.045). Relapse rates were 35% in the 25 mg group and 50% in the control group (HR = 0.52 [0.16-1.65]). In the ERPPAD trial, the study authors will compare high-dose PAP with low-dose PAP in preventing relapse in individuals with AUD and depressive symptoms. The hypothesis is that high-dose PAP will be more effective than low-dose in preventing relapse over 6 months.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| High dose psilocybin | Experimental | 2 administrations of high-dose psilocybin (25 mg) 3 weeks apart |
|
| Low-dose psilocybin | Placebo Comparator | 2 administrations of low-dose psilocybin (3 mg) 3 weeks apart |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Psilocybin (high dose) | Drug | 2 administrations of high-dose psilocybin (25 mg) 3 weeks apart |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of relapse between groups | Relapse Yes/no, where relapse is defined as the 1st heavy drinking day, assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method | Month 6 |
| Time to relapse between groups | Days until relapse, where relapse is defined as the 1st heavy drinking day, assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method | Month 6 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in relapse rate between groups | Assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method | At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline |
| Change in rate of heavy drinking days between groups |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amandine Luquiens | Contact | 04.66.68.69.98 | amandine.luquiens@chu-nimes.fr |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Amandine Luquiens | Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Centre Hospitalier de la Côte Basque | Not yet recruiting | Bayonne | France |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Psilocybin (low dose) | Drug | 2 administrations of low-dose psilocybin (3 mg) 3 weeks apart |
|
Percent; Assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method
| At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline |
| Change in total alcohol consumption between groups | Grams, assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method | At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline |
| Change in number of drinking days between groups | Days, assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method | At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline |
| Change in craving between groups | Assessed using the Craving Experience Questionnaire (CEQ), measuring strength and frequency of craving with a score ranging from 0 to 110, whereby a higher score denotes more craving. | At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline |
| Change in alcohol-related quality of life between groups | Alcohol Quality of Life Scale- brief, a 7-item questionnaire assessing the negative impact of alcohol across 7 dimensions: social relationships, activities, living conditions, self-care, negative emotions, sleep, and loss of control. | At weeks 3, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline |
| Change in anxiety between groups | Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) | At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline |
| Change in emotional dysregulation between groups | Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS), a 36-item questionnaire | At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline |
| Change in rejection sensitivity between groups | Adult Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaire (A-RSQ) | At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline |
| Change in post-Traumatic Stress Disorder between groups | Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), where a score of 44 is highly sensitive to diagnose PTSD | At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline |
| Visual Perspective task (VPT) | This task allows calculation of the egocentric bias index, the altercentric bias index and the egocentric egocentric bias | Day 0 |
| Visual Perspective task (VPT) | This task allows calculation of the egocentric bias index, the altercentric bias index and the egocentric egocentric bias | Week 3 |
| Visual Perspective task (VPT) for participants opting for a third dose | This task allows calculation of the egocentric bias index, the altercentric bias index and the egocentric egocentric bias | Week 28 |
| Request for a 3rd dose of psilocybin between groups | Yes/no | Week 27 |
| Reason for 3rd dose request | Relapse in AUD/ risk of relapse in AUD/low self-efficacy/ relapse in depression/ personal development/ other | Week 27 |
| Administration of 3rd dose | Yes/no | Week 28 |
| Relapse rate in relapsers between groups | Assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method | At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27 |
| Rate of heavy drinking days in relapsers between groups | Percent; Assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method | At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27 |
| Total alcohol consumption in relapsers between groups | Grams, assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method | At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27 |
| Change in number of drinking days in relapsers between groups | Days, assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method | At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27 |
| Change in craving in relapsers between groups | Assessed using the Craving Experience Questionnaire (CEQ), measuring strength and frequency of craving with a score ranging from 0 to 110, whereby a higher score denotes more craving. | At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27 |
| Change in alcohol-related quality of life in relapsers between groups | Alcohol Quality of Life Scale- brief, a 7-item questionnaire assessing the negative impact of alcohol across 7 dimensions: social relationships, activities, living conditions, self-care, negative emotions, sleep, and loss of control. | At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27 |
| Change in depressive symptoms in relapsers between groups | Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). The total score is the sum of the 21 item scores, ranging from 0 to 39. Higher scores indicate greater severity of depression. | At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27 |
| Change in anxiety in relapsers between groups | Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) | At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27 |
| Change in emotional dysregulation in relapsers between groups | Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS), a 36-item questionnaire | At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27 |
| Change in rejection sensitivity in relapsers between groups | Adult Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaire (A-RSQ) | At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27 |
| Change in post-Traumatic Stress Disorder between groups | Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), where a score of 44 is highly sensitive to diagnose PTSD | At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27 |
| Adverse Childhood Experiences | The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Questionnaire | Day 0 |
| Attachment style | The Relationship Scale Questionnaire (RSQ) for attachment style (secure, fearful, preoccupied, dismissing) | Day 0 |
| Severity of aocohol use disorder | The Clinical Global Impression- Severity (CGI-S) | Day 0 |
| Cognitive impairments | Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) | Day 0 |
| Features of the psychedelic experience | Acceptance/Avoidance Promoting Experience Questionnaire (APEQ) | Prior to integration session in Week 0 |
| Features of the psychedelic experience | Acceptance/Avoidance Promoting Experience Questionnaire (APEQ) | Prior to integration session in Week 3 |
| Features of the psychedelic experience | Acceptance/Avoidance Promoting Experience Questionnaire (APEQ) | Prior to integration session in Week 28 if third dose |
| Age | years | Day 0 |
| Sex | Day 0 |
| Currently under antidepressant at the inclusion | Yes/no | Day 0 |
| Diagnosed with ADHD | Yes/no | Day 0 |
| In menstruating participants, point of the menstruation cycle at psilocybin administration | Dosing session in week 0 |
| In menstruating participants, point of the menstruation cycle at psilocybin administration | Dosing session in week 3 |
| In menstruating participants, point of the menstruation cycle at psilocybin administration | Dosing session in week 28 if third dose |
| Safety and tolerance of psilocybin | List of adverse events | End of study, week 51 |
| Change in gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) between groups and subgroups | fL | At week 28 compared to baseline |
| Change in carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) between groups and subgroups | U/L | At week 28 compared to baseline |
| Change in mean corpuscular volume (MCV) between groups and subgroups | Percentage | At week 28 compared to baseline |
| Guess the group | Two-item questionnaire developed from the EPIsoDE framework | After dosing session Week 0 |
| Guess the group | Two-item questionnaire developed from the EPIsoDE framework | After dosing session Week 3 |
| CHU Besançon | Not yet recruiting | Besançon | France |
|
| CHU de Bordeaux | Not yet recruiting | Bordeaux | France |
|
| CHU Brest | Not yet recruiting | Brest | France |
|
| CH Le Vinatier | Not yet recruiting | Bron | France |
|
| CHU de Nantes | Not yet recruiting | Nantes | France |
|
| CHU de Nîmes | Recruiting | Nîmes | 30029 | France |
|
| CHU Saint-Etienne | Not yet recruiting | Saint-Priest | France |
|
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000437 | Alcoholism |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019973 | Alcohol-Related Disorders |
| D019966 | Substance-Related Disorders |
| D064419 | Chemically-Induced Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011562 | Psilocybin |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D026121 | Indole Alkaloids |
| D000470 | Alkaloids |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D007211 | Indoles |
| D006574 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
| D014363 | Tryptamines |
| D054836 | Indolizidines |
| D007212 | Indolizines |
Not provided
Not provided