Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This project aims to develop a precision screening and diagnostic solution for prostate cancer based on multimodal artificial intelligence, focusing on addressing the diagnostic challenge in patients within the PSA "gray zone" of 4-10 ng/mL. The project will integrate multidimensional information including ctDNA liquid biopsy, routine laboratory data, and prostate ultrasound images to develop three models: a ctDNA-based multimodal AI prediction model, a routine laboratory data-assisted decision model, and an ultrasound image AI-assisted diagnostic model. On this basis, a multimodal AI fusion decision system will be established to automatically generate individualized risk assessment reports and diagnostic recommendations. Additionally, a closed-loop mechanism of "clinical use - data feedback - model optimization" will be constructed to continuously iterate model parameters using pathological gold standards, thereby improving predictive accuracy in our hospital population. The project will form a generalizable precision diagnostic workflow, reduce unnecessary biopsies in "gray zone" patients, and provide an implementable in-hospital solution for precision medicine in prostate cancer.
Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common malignancy in men worldwide. In China, the average annual growth rate of PCa incidence is as high as 7.2%. Current diagnostic pathways rely on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy. However, serum PSA, the main decision-making indicator for biopsy, is not cancer-specific and has severely insufficient specificity. Many men with elevated PSA undergo unnecessary invasive biopsies. The diagnostic challenge is particularly prominent in the PSA "gray zone" of 4-10 ng/mL.
Objectives: This study aims to develop a precision screening and diagnostic solution for prostate cancer based on multimodal artificial intelligence, focusing on addressing the diagnostic challenge in patients within the PSA gray zone. Specific objectives include: (1) improving screening efficiency to quickly identify high-risk individuals and avoid over-examination; (2) solving the diagnostic gray zone problem; (3) reducing unnecessary biopsies through non-invasive or minimally invasive precision tools; and (4) achieving personalized management through risk stratification.
Study Design: Prospective enrollment of suspected prostate cancer patients. Total sample size is no less than 500 cases, divided into training set (approximately 400 cases) and validation set (approximately 100 cases) at an 8:2 ratio.
Eligibility Criteria:
Inclusion criteria: (1) age ≥45 years, male; (2) presenting with abnormal serum PSA (≥4 ng/mL), abnormal digital rectal examination, or suspicious lesions on prostate ultrasound; (3) undergoing prostate biopsy with definitive pathological results; (4) signed informed consent.
Exclusion criteria: (1) previously diagnosed with prostate cancer and receiving surgery, radiotherapy, or endocrine therapy; (2) with other malignancies; (3) critical missing clinical data (e.g., missing PSA value, incomplete ultrasound report).
Study Interventions/Assessments: All enrolled patients complete the following data collection: (1) serum PSA and free PSA; (2) routine laboratory tests including complete blood count, liver and kidney function; (3) transrectal or transabdominal prostate ultrasound with images stored in DICOM format and prostate volume recorded; (4) post-prostate massage urine for ctDNA methylation target detection; (5) digital rectal examination results, age, family history, medical history; (6) pathological diagnosis results from biopsy as gold standard.
Models to be Developed:
Tool 1 - ctDNA multimodal AI prediction model: using ctDNA methylation results combined with age, PSA, and prostate volume. Logistic regression and random forest will be compared.
Tool 2 - Routine laboratory data-assisted decision model: integrating structured data including complete blood count, liver and kidney function, PSA, free PSA, age, and prostate volume. XGBoost and LightGBM with LASSO feature reduction will be used.
Tool 3 - Prostate ultrasound image AI-assisted diagnostic model: using convolutional neural network (ResNet or DenseNet architecture) for deep learning modeling. The model outputs lesion probability heatmaps and malignancy probability scores.
Multimodal Fusion Strategy: The three model outputs will be combined according to preset fusion rules to generate comprehensive risk stratification (low/moderate/high concern). Diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and AUC of the fusion solution will be calculated using pathological results as gold standard. The AUC will be compared with that of PSA alone using DeLong test. Stratified analysis will be performed for the PSA 4-10 ng/mL gray zone subgroup. Decision curve analysis (DCA) will be used to evaluate clinical net benefit.
Closed-loop Optimization: All pathological results will be periodically returned to the model management system in a de-identified manner, and quarterly iterative optimization of the three specialized models and fusion rules will be conducted.
Study Duration: May 2026 to May 2028 (approximately 2 years).
Funding: This is a hospital-level research project with an application fund of 50,000 RMB.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Training Set | Approximately 400 cases. This group will be used to develop and internally validate the three specialized models: (1) ctDNA multimodal AI prediction model, (2) routine laboratory data-assisted decision model, and (3) prostate ultrasound image AI-assisted diagnostic model. Five-fold cross-validation will be used for algorithm comparison and hyperparameter tuning. | ||
| Validation Set | Approximately 100 cases. This independent validation set will be used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the multimodal fusion decision system. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and AUC will be calculated using pathological results as the gold standard. DeLong test will be used to compare AUC with PSA alone. Decision curve analysis (DCA) will be used to evaluate clinical net benefit. Subgroup analysis will be performed for the PSA 4-10 ng/mL gray zone. |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the multimodal AI fusion diagnostic system | The AUC of the fusion model in distinguishing clinically significant prostate cancer from non-cancer or indolent cancer, using pathological biopsy results as the gold standard. | Measured after all participants have completed biopsy and obtained pathological diagnosis (approximately within the 2-year study period). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity and Specificity of the Multimodal AI Fusion Diagnostic System | The sensitivity and specificity of the fusion model in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer, using pathological biopsy results as the gold standard. | Measured after all participants have completed biopsy and obtained pathological diagnosis (approximately within the 2-year study period). |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study population consists of male patients aged ≥45 years with suspected prostate cancer, presenting with abnormal serum PSA (≥4 ng/mL), abnormal digital rectal examination, or suspicious lesions on prostate ultrasound, who are scheduled to undergo prostate biopsy. Participants will be prospectively enrolled from patients presenting to the hospital for PSA abnormality, lower urinary tract symptoms, or active screening.
The total planned sample size is no less than 500 cases, divided into a training set (approximately 400 cases) and a validation set (approximately 100 cases) at an 8:2 ratio.
Excluded are patients with prior diagnosis of prostate cancer receiving active treatment, those with other malignancies, and those with critical missing clinical data.
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangxi Medical University First Affiliated Hospital | Nan'ning | Guangxi | China |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35852595 | Background | Wang X, Xie Y, Zheng X, Liu B, Chen H, Li J, Ma X, Xiang J, Weng G, Zhu W, Wang G, Fang Y, Cheng H, Xie L. A prospective multi-center randomized comparative trial evaluating outcomes of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided 12-core systematic biopsy, mpMRI-targeted 12-core biopsy, and artificial intelligence ultrasound of prostate (AIUSP) 6-core targeted biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis. World J Urol. 2023 Mar;41(3):653-662. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04086-0. Epub 2022 Jul 19. | |
| 28110982 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011471 | Prostatic Neoplasms |
| D004194 | Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005834 | Genital Neoplasms, Male |
| D014565 | Urogenital Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Urine (post-prostate massage, first-catch voided urine, 30-50 mL), collected into a specialized preservation tube containing nuclease inhibitors, stored at room temperature, and processed within 24 hours. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is extracted from the urine for targeted bisulfite sequencing or quantitative PCR to detect prostate cancer-related DNA methylation markers.
| Background |
| Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, Gabe R, Kaplan R, Parmar MK, Collaco-Moraes Y, Ward K, Hindley RG, Freeman A, Kirkham AP, Oldroyd R, Parker C, Emberton M; PROMIS study group. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):815-822. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1. Epub 2017 Jan 20. |
| 30634483 | Background | Gai W, Sun K. Epigenetic Biomarkers in Cell-Free DNA and Applications in Liquid Biopsy. Genes (Basel). 2019 Jan 9;10(1):32. doi: 10.3390/genes10010032. |
| 27254598 | Background | He WS, Bishop KS. The potential use of cell-free-circulating-tumor DNA as a biomarker for prostate cancer. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2016 Aug;16(8):839-52. doi: 10.1080/14737159.2016.1197121. Epub 2016 Jun 20. |
| 9988266 | Background | Jones PA, Laird PW. Cancer epigenetics comes of age. Nat Genet. 1999 Feb;21(2):163-7. doi: 10.1038/5947. |
| 27626136 | Background | Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, Mason M, Metcalfe C, Holding P, Davis M, Peters TJ, Turner EL, Martin RM, Oxley J, Robinson M, Staffurth J, Walsh E, Bollina P, Catto J, Doble A, Doherty A, Gillatt D, Kockelbergh R, Kynaston H, Paul A, Powell P, Prescott S, Rosario DJ, Rowe E, Neal DE; ProtecT Study Group. 10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1415-1424. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606220. Epub 2016 Sep 14. |
| 26530362 | Background | Salman JW, Schoots IG, Carlsson SV, Jenster G, Roobol MJ. Prostate Specific Antigen as a Tumor Marker in Prostate Cancer: Biochemical and Clinical Aspects. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2015;867:93-114. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-7215-0_7. |
| 25444971 | Background | Abraham NE, Mendhiratta N, Taneja SS. Patterns of repeat prostate biopsy in contemporary clinical practice. J Urol. 2015 Apr;193(4):1178-84. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.10.084. Epub 2014 Oct 18. |
| 22240787 | Background | Serag H, Banerjee S, Saeb-Parsy K, Irving S, Wright K, Stearn S, Doble A, Gnanapragasam VJ. Risk profiles of prostate cancers identified from UK primary care using national referral guidelines. Br J Cancer. 2012 Jan 31;106(3):436-9. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.596. Epub 2012 Jan 12. |
| 20174484 | Background | Toren P, Razik R, Trachtenberg J. Catastrophic sepsis and hemorrhage following transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsies. Can Urol Assoc J. 2010 Feb;4(1):E12-4. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.785. |
| 26700859 | Background | Anderson E, Leahy O, Cheng AC, Grummet J. Risk factors for infection following prostate biopsy - a case control study. BMC Infect Dis. 2015 Dec 23;15:580. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-1328-7. |
| 38614820 | Background | Cornford P, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, Van den Broeck T, Brunckhorst O, Darraugh J, Eberli D, De Meerleer G, De Santis M, Farolfi A, Gandaglia G, Gillessen S, Grivas N, Henry AM, Lardas M, van Leenders GJLH, Liew M, Linares Espinos E, Oldenburg J, van Oort IM, Oprea-Lager DE, Ploussard G, Roberts MJ, Rouviere O, Schoots IG, Schouten N, Smith EJ, Stranne J, Wiegel T, Willemse PM, Tilki D. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2024 Update. Part I: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. Eur Urol. 2024 Aug;86(2):148-163. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.03.027. Epub 2024 Apr 13. |
| 39036382 | Background | Han B, Zheng R, Zeng H, Wang S, Sun K, Chen R, Li L, Wei W, He J. Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2022. J Natl Cancer Cent. 2024 Feb 2;4(1):47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jncc.2024.01.006. eCollection 2024 Mar. |
| 29740894 | Background | Kimura T, Egawa S. Epidemiology of prostate cancer in Asian countries. Int J Urol. 2018 Jun;25(6):524-531. doi: 10.1111/iju.13593. Epub 2018 May 8. |
| 40892160 | Background | Kratzer TB, Mazzitelli N, Star J, Dahut WL, Jemal A, Siegel RL. Prostate cancer statistics, 2025. CA Cancer J Clin. 2025 Nov-Dec;75(6):485-497. doi: 10.3322/caac.70028. Epub 2025 Sep 2. |
| 37488510 | Result | Zhang H, Ji J, Liu Z, Lu H, Qian C, Wei C, Chen S, Lu W, Wang C, Xu H, Xu Y, Chen X, He X, Wang Z, Zhao X, Cheng W, Chen X, Pang G, Yu G, Gu Y, Jiang K, Xu B, Chen J, Xu B, Wei X, Chen M, Chen R, Cheng J, Wang F. Artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer based on multimodal data: a multicenter study. BMC Med. 2023 Jul 24;21(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-02964-x. |
| D005832 |
| Genital Diseases, Male |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D011469 | Prostatic Diseases |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |