Noninvasive Ventilation Versus High-Flow Nasal Cannula After Extubation in High-Risk ICU Patients

Comparative Study Between Noninvasive Ventilation and High Flow Nasal Cannula in Patients With High Risk of Extubation Failure

Extubation failure is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. High-risk patients may benefit from preventive respiratory support after extubation. This randomized controlled trial compared noninvasive ventilation (NIV) with high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients at high risk of extubation failure. The study evaluated reintubation rates, time to reintubation, physiological parameters, complications, and clinical outcomes following planned extubation. The aim was to determine the optimal post-extubation respiratory support strategy for reducing extubation failure in high-risk ICU patients.

inclusion criteria

1. Age ≥18 years.
2. Received invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours.
3. Considered ready for planned extubation after successful completion of a spontaneous breathing trial.
4. High risk of extubation failure, defined by the presence of at least four of the following risk factors:

Age >65 years. APACHE II score >12 on the day of extubation. Body mass index >30 kg/m². Inadequate secretion management. Difficult or prolonged weaning. Two or more comorbidities. Acute heart failure requiring mechanical ventilation. Moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Airway patency problems. Prolonged mechanical ventilation. Hypercapnia at the end of the spontaneous breathing trial.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Age <18 years.
2. Presence of a tracheostomy.
3. Accidental extubation.
4. Self-extubation.
5. Contraindication to noninvasive ventilation.