Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter Phase Ib/II clinical study designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and PK characteristics of HL-300 ointment with different concentration regimens for mild-to-moderate AD.
In the study, it is planned to enroll approximately 148-156 trial participants, divided into two cohorts. Cohort 1: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-parallel controlled study design, planning to enroll 140 trial participants, randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to the study group or placebo group, with baseline disease severity (mild [vIGA-AD = 2] and moderate [vIGA-AD = 3]) set as stratification factors to ensure balanced participant status across groups. Cohort 2: an open-label, intensive sampling design, planning to enroll 8 trial participants for each dosage strength, enrolled separately, with continuous dosing for 8 days.
The study includes a screening period, a treatment period, and a follow-up period. The quality management system for this trial aims to prospectively integrate quality by design into all aspects of the trial to ensure the rights and interests, safety, and well-being of trial participants, and to guarantee the reliability of the generated data and the scientific validity of the trial results. This system strictly adheres to the principles of ICH E6(R3) and ICH E8(R1), employing a risk-based and proportionate approach.
During the trial design phase, the investigators have systematically identified the critical to quality (CtQ) factors for ensuring the quality of this trial. Given the known safety profile of JAK inhibitors (e.g., infections, hematologic abnormalities, hepatic and renal function effects, thrombosis, etc.), the CtQ factors for this trial will specifically focus on:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group D | Placebo Comparator |
| |
| Group A | Experimental | Group A:0.25% |
|
| Group B | Experimental | Group B:0.5% |
|
| Group C | Experimental | Group C:1.0% |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HL-300 | Drug | Group A receives the investigational product at a concentration of 0.25%, BID,4 weeks. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) | Percentage change from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score at Week 4 (W4). The EASI score ranges from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating more severe AD. | 4 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Eczema Area and Severity Index(EASI) | Change from baseline in EASI score at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment. The EASI score ranges from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating more severe AD. | at Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 6 after treatment. |
| EASI50(≥50% improvement from baseline in EASI score) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Age ≥18 years and ≤75 years at the time of ICF signing, with no gender restriction
Meeting the Hanifin & Rajka diagnostic criteria for atopic dermatitis (AD) at screening, with a history of AD ≥ 6 months before screening, and the AD condition judged by the investigator to be stable within 4 weeks prior to ICF signing,.
vIGA-AD score of 2-3 at screening and baseline visits;
EASI score within the range of 5-21 at screening and baseline;
"Body Surface Area (BSA) affected by AD skin lesions meeting one of the following requirements at screening and baseline visits, with skin lesions suitable for topical treatment:
Women of childbearing potential and men willing to use at least one highly effective method of contraception or practice abstinence from the time of informed consent signing until 3 months after the last dose of the investigational product
Those who voluntarily participate in the study and sign the informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria:
(1) Any significant clinical and laboratory abnormalities that the investigator believes may affect trial participant safety, including but not limited to:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Wu Liming NA, Doctor of Medicine | First People's Hospital of Hangzhou | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hangzhou First People's Hospital | Recruiting | Hangzhou | Zhejiang | China |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003876 | Dermatitis, Atopic |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012873 | Skin Diseases, Genetic |
| D030342 | Genetic Diseases, Inborn |
| D009358 | Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities |
| D003872 | Dermatitis |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo | Drug | BID, day 7. |
|
| HL-300 | Drug | Group B receives the investigational product at a concentration of 0.5%, BID,4 weeks. |
|
| HL-300 | Drug | Group A receives the investigational product at a concentration of 1.0%, BID,4 weeks. |
|
Proportion of trial participants with ≥50% improvement from baseline in EASI score (EASI50) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment. The EASI score ranges from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating more severe AD. |
| at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment |
| EASI75(≥75% improvement from baseline in EASI score) | Proportion of trial participants with ≥75% improvement from baseline in EASI score (EASI75) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment. The EASI score ranges from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating more severe AD. | at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment |
| EASI90(≥90% improvement from baseline in EASI score) | Proportion of trial participants with ≥90% improvement from baseline in EASI score (EASI90) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment. The EASI score ranges from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating more severe AD. | at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment. |
| Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis(vIGA-AD) | Proportion of trial participants achieving vIGA-AD score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) and ≥2-point improvement from baseline at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment. The vIGA-AD scale divides disease severity into 5 grades (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe), each corresponding to specific skin lesion morphological characteristics. A higher grade indicates greater severity. | at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment. |
| Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis(vIGA-AD) | Proportion of trial participants achieving vIGA-AD score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment. The vIGA-AD scale divides disease severity into 5 grades (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe), each corresponding to specific skin lesion morphological characteristics. A higher grade indicates greater severity. | at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment. |
| Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) | Change from baseline in weekly average itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment. This scale assesses the most severe itch intensity subjectively felt by the trial participant due to AD in the past 24 h. The scale rates itch intensity on 10 levels (0 means no itch, 10 means the worst itch imaginable), with integer scores.The higher the score, the greater the disease severity. | at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment. |
| Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) | Percentage of trial participants with ≥4-point improvement from baseline in weekly average itch NRS at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment. This scale assesses the most severe itch intensity subjectively felt by the trial participant due to AD in the past 24 h. The scale rates itch intensity on 10 levels (0 means no itch, 10 means the worst itch imaginable), with integer scores.The higher the score, the greater the disease severity. | at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment |
| Scoring Atopic Dermatitis(SCORAD) | ]Change from baseline and percentage change from baseline in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment. The SCORAD score ranging from 0 to 103 points. Based on the score, the condition is classified as mild (0-24 points), moderate (25-50 points), and severe (>50 points). | at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment. |
| Body Surface Area (BSA) | Change from baseline and percentage change from baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) affected by AD at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment. The BSA ranges from 0% to 100%. The larger the range, the more severe the affected area. | at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment. |
| Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) | Change from baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment. DLQI contains 10 questions, with a total score ranging from 0 to 30.The higher the score, the greater the impact on quality of life. | at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment. |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D017443 | Skin Diseases, Eczematous |
| D006969 | Hypersensitivity, Immediate |
| D006967 | Hypersensitivity |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |