Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21261279 | Other Grant/Funding Number | ANID/Beca de Doctorado Nacional 2026.Chile | |
| DI-07-25/INI | Other Grant/Funding Number | Concurso de Iniciación a la Investigación UNAB 2025,Chile | |
| 24 010884 01 | Other Grant/Funding Number | Programme Ambition International 2024, La Région Auvergne Rhône Alpes,France |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effects of contralateral eccentric and concentric resistance training performed during the immobilization period following acromioclavicular joint injury. Immobilization is commonly prescribed after injury but may lead to reductions in muscle mass, neuromuscular function, force production, and upper-limb functionality.
Contralateral resistance training, also known as cross-education training, involves exercising the non-injured limb to induce beneficial adaptations in the immobilized limb through neural mechanisms. While both eccentric and concentric exercise may produce contralateral effects, their relative effectiveness in a clinical population remains unclear.
Participants with acute acromioclavicular joint injury requiring sling immobilization will be randomly assigned to either a contralateral eccentric training group or a contralateral concentric training group. During immobilization, participants will perform supervised resistance training with the non-injured upper limb. Following immobilization, all participants will receive the same standardized rehabilitation program.
Neuromuscular function, muscle morphology, force production, upper-limb function, and quality of life will be assessed before immobilization, after immobilization, and following rehabilitation. The findings may contribute to the development of more effective rehabilitation strategies for patients recovering from upper-limb injuries requiring temporary immobilization.
Acromioclavicular joint injury is one of the most common shoulder injuries in physically active individuals. Temporary immobilization using a sling is frequently prescribed during the acute phase of recovery; however, immobilization can result in rapid declines in muscle strength, muscle mass, neuromuscular function, and upper-limb performance.
Cross-education is a neurophysiological phenomenon whereby unilateral resistance training induces adaptations in the contralateral untrained limb. Previous experimental studies have demonstrated that resistance exercise performed with the non-immobilized limb may attenuate strength loss and neuromuscular impairments in an immobilized limb. However, the relative effectiveness of different muscle contraction modes during cross-education training in clinical populations remains poorly understood.
The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the effectiveness of contralateral eccentric versus contralateral concentric resistance training performed during the immobilization period in patients with acromioclavicular joint injury. Participants will be randomly allocated to one of two intervention groups: (1) contralateral eccentric resistance training or (2) contralateral concentric resistance training. Both interventions will be performed using the non-injured upper limb during the period of prescribed sling immobilization.
Participants will undergo comprehensive assessments before immobilization, immediately after immobilization, and after completion of a standardized rehabilitation program. Outcomes will include measures of neuromuscular function obtained through peripheral nerve stimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation, electromyography, and voluntary force assessments. Muscle morphology will be evaluated using ultrasound imaging, while upper-limb function and quality of life will be assessed using validated clinical questionnaires.
Following immobilization, all participants will receive the same rehabilitation program focused on restoring shoulder stability, muscle strength, and functional capacity. The primary objective is to determine whether eccentric or concentric contralateral resistance training more effectively preserves neuromuscular function and facilitates recovery following immobilization.
The results of this study may provide evidence to optimize rehabilitation strategies for patients with acromioclavicular joint injuries and other musculoskeletal conditions requiring temporary upper-limb immobilization.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Contralateral Eccentric Training | Experimental | Participants will perform supervised contralateral eccentric resistance training with the non-injured upper limb during the period of physician-prescribed sling immobilization following acute acromioclavicular joint injury, with or without surgical repair. The immobilization period is expected to last approximately 2 to 4 weeks depending on clinical management. Following immobilization, participants will complete a standardized 4-week rehabilitation program. |
|
| Contralateral Concentric Training | Active Comparator | Participants will perform supervised contralateral concentric resistance training with the non-injured upper limb during the period of physician-prescribed sling immobilization following acute acromioclavicular joint injury, with or without surgical repair. The immobilization period is expected to last approximately 2 to 4 weeks depending on clinical management. Following immobilization, participants will complete the same standardized 4-week rehabilitation program. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contralateral Eccentric Resistance Training | Behavioral | Supervised unilateral eccentric elbow flexor training performed with the non-injured limb during sling immobilization (2-4 weeks). Training is performed 3 times/week, 5 sets of 8-12 repetitions at 60-90% 1RM, with 4-second contractions and 3-minute rest intervals between sets. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction | Maximal voluntary isometric force of the injured upper limb assessed using a calibrated dynamometer. Force values will be recorded during standardized maximal isometric contractions and used to evaluate changes in muscle performance throughout immobilization and rehabilitation. Unit: Newtons (N) | Baseline, post-immobilization (2-4 weeks), and post-rehabilitation (6-8 weeks) |
| Rate of Force Development | Rate of force development (RFD) of the injured upper limb assessed during maximal voluntary isometric contractions using a calibrated dynamometer. RFD will be calculated from the force-time curve and used as an indicator of explosive force production and neuromuscular performance. Unit: N·s-¹ (N/s) | Baseline, post-immobilization (2-4 weeks), and post-rehabilitation (6-8 weeks) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Elbow Flexors Voluntary Activation | Voluntary activation of the elbow flexors assessed using the interpolated twitch technique during maximal voluntary isometric contractions. Values will be expressed as a percentage of voluntary neural drive to the muscle. Unit: % | Baseline, post-immobilization (2-4 weeks), and post-rehabilitation (6-8 weeks) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omar E Valdés Tapia, PT, MSc, PhD(c) | Contact | +569 74082822 | o.valdestapia@uandresbello.edu |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Claudio Chamorro Lange, PhD | Universidad Nacional Andres Bello | Study Director |
| Luis Peñailillo Escaráte, PhD | Universidad Nacional Andres Bello | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ClÃnica Indisa | Recruiting | Santiago | Providencia | Chile |
De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in publications arising from this study will be made available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request. Shared data may include demographic characteristics, clinical outcomes, force production measurements, neuromuscular assessments, electromyographic recordings, transcranial magnetic stimulation outcomes, peripheral nerve stimulation outcomes, and questionnaire-derived scores. Data will be provided in a de-identified format to protect participant confidentiality.
Data will become available beginning 6 months following publication of the primary study results and will remain available for a period of 5 years.
Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal and whose intended use of the data has been approved by the study investigators may access the data. Requests should be directed to the Principal Investigator. Data will be shared through a secure institutional repository or encrypted electronic transfer following execution of an appropriate data-sharing agreement.
Not provided
Not provided
Participants with acute acromioclavicular joint injury requiring a period of upper-limb immobilization with a sling, either following conservative management or surgical repair, will be randomly assigned to one of two parallel intervention groups: contralateral concentric resistance training or contralateral eccentric resistance training. Both interventions will be performed with the non-injured upper limb during the immobilization period. Following immobilization, all participants will receive the same standardized rehabilitation program. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, after immobilization, and after completion of rehabilitation.
Not provided
Not provided
Outcome assessors and data analysts will be blinded to group allocation throughout data collection and statistical analysis.
|
| Contralateral Concentric Resistance Training | Behavioral | Supervised unilateral concentric elbow flexor training performed with the non-injured limb during sling immobilization (2-4 weeks). Training is performed 3 times/week, 5 sets of 8-12 repetitions at 60-90% 1RM, with 4-second contractions and 3-minute rest intervals between sets. |
|
| Biceps Brachii Motor Supramaximal Response Amplitude | Peak-to-peak amplitude of the motor supramaximal response (MSUP) evoked by peripheral nerve stimulation during submaximal contractions as an indicator of motor pathway excitability. Unit: mV | Baseline, post-immobilization (2-4 weeks), and post-rehabilitation (6-8 weeks) |
| Biceps Brachii Motor Evoked Potential Amplitude | Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation and normalized to peripheral responses to assess corticospinal excitability. Unit: mV | Baseline, post-immobilization (2-4 weeks), and post-rehabilitation (6-8 weeks) |
| Biceps Brachii Silent Period Duration | Duration of the electromyographic silent period following transcranial magnetic stimulation during voluntary contractions as an indicator of cortical inhibition. Unit: ms | Baseline, post-immobilization (2-4 weeks), and post-rehabilitation (6-8 weeks) |
| Biceps Brachii Short-Interval Intracortical Inhibition | Short-interval intracortical inhibition assessed using paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation as an index of intracortical inhibitory function. Unit: mV | Baseline, post-immobilization (2-4 weeks), and post-rehabilitation (6-8 weeks) |
| Biceps Brachii Cervicomedullary Motor Evoked Potential Amplitude | Motor unit discharge characteristics assessed using high-density surface electromyography, including discharge rate, recruitment thresholds, and estimates of intrinsic motoneuron properties. Unit: mV | Baseline, post-immobilization (2-4 weeks), and post-rehabilitation (6-8 weeks) |
| Biceps Brachii Motor Unit Behavior | Motor unit discharge characteristics assessed using high-density surface electromyography, including discharge rate, recruitment thresholds, and estimates of intrinsic motoneuron properties. Unit: pulses/s (pps) | Baseline, post-immobilization (2-4 weeks), and post-rehabilitation (6-8 weeks) |
| Biceps Brachii MMAX Amplitude | Peak-to-peak amplitude of the maximal compound muscle action potential (MMAX) evoked by peripheral nerve stimulation as an indicator of peripheral excitability. Unit: mV | Baseline, post-immobilization (2-4 weeks), and post-rehabilitation (6-8 weeks) |
| Biceps Brachii Peripheral Contractile Properties | Evoked twitch and doublet force responses obtained using peripheral nerve stimulation to assess muscle contractile function. Unit: N | Baseline, post-immobilization (2-4 weeks), and post-rehabilitation (6-8 weeks) |
| Biceps Brachii Muscle Thickness | Muscle thickness assessed by B-mode ultrasonography as an indicator of muscle morphology and preservation during immobilization and rehabilitation. Unit: mm | Baseline, post-immobilization (2-4 weeks), and post-rehabilitation (6-8 weeks) |
| Upper Limb Function (QuickDASH) | Upper-limb disability and functional status assessed using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire. Unit: 0-100 points | Baseline, post-immobilization (2-4 weeks), and post-rehabilitation (6-8 weeks) |
| Health-Related Quality of Life (SF-36) | Health-related quality of life assessed using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Unit: 0-100 points | Baseline, post-immobilization (2-4 weeks), and post-rehabilitation (6-8 weeks) |