Impact of Finishing/Polishing Systems on Ormocer Versus Methacrylate Based Bulk Fill Flowable Composite in Class V Restorations: Clinical Study and Laboratory Investigations
Impact of Finishing/Polishing Systems on Ormocer Versus Methacrylate Based Bulk Fill Flowable Composite in Class V Restorations: Clinical Study and Laboratory Investigations
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate and compare. Impact of finishing/polishing systems on ormocer versus methacrylate-based bulk-fill flowable composite in Class V restorations: The main question it aims to answer is the following:
Are there any differences between finishing/polishing systems on Ormocer versus methacrylate-based bulk-fill flowable composite?
This study will evaluate the impact of three different finishing/polishing systems on ormocer versus methacrylate-based bulk-fill flowable composite in Class V restorations on adult patients' anterior teeth. First, investigators will use an ormocer and methacrylate-based bulk-fill flowable composite in Class V restorations in anterior teeth. Then each patient will receive three different finishing/polishing systems. Investigators will follow patients at 2 weeks, 6 months, 18 months, and 24 months to assess the restorations according to the FDI criteria as esthetic properties (A1 surface luster and surface texture; A2 marginal staining; A3 color match), functional (F1 fracture/retention; F2 marginal adaptation), and biological (B1 caries at restoration margin). The results will help dentists choose the most appropriate finishing/polishing systems for Class V restoration cases.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
dohazahran96@gmail.com00201026336671
mahaebaya@mans.edu.eg00201003749266