Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy of three Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) delivery modalities in treating Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in adult patients (ages 20-40) with mild to moderate PTSD severity in Pakistan.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Researchers will compare three groups: (A) TAU receiving clinic-based ACT sessions without app support, (B) clinic-based ACT sessions assisted by the "ACT PTSD" web application, and (C) fully online ACT delivery with web-app support - to determine whether digital augmentation enhances treatment outcomes beyond standard clinical delivery.
Participants will:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| TREATMENT AS USUAL | Experimental | Patients received Acceptance Commitment Therapy in clinical setting. This phase was the treatment phase of the study. |
|
| Face-to-face ACT with app support | Experimental | Received ACT intervention through face-to-face sessions along with web-based app assistance. |
|
| Online ACT with app support | Experimental | Online ACT intervention along with web-based app assitance. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceptance Commitment Therapy | Behavioral | The ACT Path web application is a clinician-gated, ACT-based treatment-assistance tool developed specifically for adults with PTSD. Unlike self-administered apps, it operates within a therapist-controlled workflow: clients access 12 structured weekly sessions only after clinical approval, with session assignment (including flexible sequencing of trauma narrative work) guided by the therapist. All six ACT hexaflex processes are delivered via interactive sessions with embedded audio guidance and gamified defusion exercises. Built-in validated assessments (PCL-5, AAQ-II, DERS-SF, PDEQ-SF) auto-score and populate a therapist dashboard; a unique safety screen flags suicidal ideation and harm risk across three timeframes. A panic button provides crisis support. Cultural adaptation for a collectivistic, low-resource context distinguishes it from existing Western-developed PTSD apps. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| PCL-5 | PCL-5 is a 20-item self-report measure designed to evaluate the severity of PTSD symptoms. The scale uses a 5-point Likert scale from 0-4 (0= Not at all & 4=Extremely). The scores range from 0 to 80. The scales showed good internal reliability with a Cronbach's Alpha value of 0.90. The scale has no reverse-coded items. The scale has 4 subscales: Cluster B: Intrusion symptoms (5 items), Cluster C: Avoidance (2 items), Cluster D: Negative alterations in cognitions and mood (7 items), and Cluster E: Alterations in arousal and reactivity (6 items) | pre-intervention and immediatly after the intervention |
| Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II) | Psychological inflexibility was measured with the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II), which is a brief 7-item self-report measure. AAQ-II uses a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never true) to 7 (always true). The scale is also a unidimensional scale with no reverse coding. Low scores indicate the presence of psychological flexibility, whereas higher scores indicate higher psychological inflexibility. | pre-intervention and immediatly after the intervention |
| Difficulty in Emotion Regulation Scale Short Form (DERS-SF) | The DERS-SF is an 18-item self-report measure designed to evaluate individuals' typical patterns of emotional regulation difficulties while maintaining the score structure of the original DERS. The scale utilizes a 5-point Likert scale (1=Almost never to 5=Almost always). The total score ranges from 18 to 90; a higher score indicates higher emotional dysregulation. The scale also showed good internal reliability, 0.89-0.94. The scale has 6 subscales: Non-acceptance of emotional responses (3 items), difficulty engaging in goal-directed behavior (3 items), impulse control difficulties (3 items), lack of emotional awareness (3 items), limited access to emotion regulation strategies (3 items), and lack of emotional clarity (3 items). All the items of lack of emotional awareness are reverse-coded items. | pre-intervention and immediatly after the intervention |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Lubna DAR | University of Central Punjab | Principal Investigator |
| SHAZIA HASAN | University of Central Punjab | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lubna DAR | Lahore | Punjab Province | 54000 | Pakistan |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013313 | Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D040921 | Stress Disorders, Traumatic |
| D000068099 | Trauma and Stressor Related Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D064869 | Acceptance and Commitment Therapy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015928 | Cognitive Behavioral Therapy |
| D001521 | Behavior Therapy |
| D011613 | Psychotherapy |
| D004191 | Behavioral Disciplines and Activities |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|