Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-517948-66-00 | EU Trial (CTIS) Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Piriformis muscle syndrome (PMS) is characterized by symptoms caused by compression or irritation of the sciatic nerve by the piriformis muscle as it exits the sciatic notch. PMS commonly evokes the symptoms of sciatica and is likely underdisagnosed. Patients who experience pain related to piriformis syndrome will complain of aggravated pain after prolonged periods of sitting or upon rising from a seated position. Around 98% of patients evoke positional buttock pain, especially during prolonged sitting (car journeys, for example). This is less true for sciatic pain radiation, which is still found in 63% of cases, systematically associated with the notion of buttock pain. Treatments for PMS aim to reduce or eliminate sciatic pain and also control buttock pain. Reducing these pains can improve the physical condition and emotional state of the patient. Several approaches have been proposed including physical therapy (massage-physiotherapy, self-rehabilitation techniques) combined with the use of anti-inflammatory drugs, analgesics and muscle relaxants to reduce inflammation, spasm and pain. Many patients do not respond to conventional care. Surgery may be considered only in those cases who do not improve with conservative therapy or injections. However, decompressive surgery is an invasive treatment, indicated in case of complete failure of all medical strategies, with physical and functional consequences. In recent years, several published studies showed the use of botulinum toxin (BT) injection as a new therapeutic option to reduce buttock and sciatic pain induced by PMS. The study team previously observed the efficacy of BT/A1 administration into the piriformis muscle in patients who were previously treated with medication and rehabilitation protocols with no pain improvement. Pain relief was considered as "very good" or "good" for 77% of the patients, "average" for 7.4% and "poor" for 15.6%. No adverse events were reported. More recently, Fishman and colleagues reported the results of a randomized, double-blind, controlled study including 56 patients and comparing physical therapy, incobotulinum toxin A and placebo. Data are sparse concerning BT injection for PMS and no multicenter randomized clinical trial have been performed. Two out of three randomized trials (Fishman 2004, 2017) are based on highly selected patients (3 standard deviations or more beyond on the prolongation of the posterior tibial or fibular nerve H-reflex in FAIR test). Therefore, BT efficacy may be overestimated and remains to be evaluated among unselected PMS patients, regardless of analgesic treatments or physical therapy. Finally, no randomized studies have reported the heatlh-related quality of life of PMS patients.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Botulinum toxin injection | Experimental |
| |
| Placebo injection | Placebo Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Botulinum Toxin - A injections | Drug | Incobotulinumtoxin type A (200 U in 2 mL of preservative-free normal saline) will be injected in equally divided doses (1mL; 100 U for incobotulinumtoxin A) into 2 locations in the affected buttock region |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in sciatic pain | Measured on a 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain) visual analog scale | From baseline to Week 6 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in buttock pain intensity | Measured on a 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain) visual analog scale | From baseline to Week 6 |
| Health-related quality of life | EuroQol-5 Dimension questionnaire measuring five items representing the five dimensions, and a visual analog scale graduated from 0 to 100 (100 referring to the "best possible state of health"). For each dimension, patients indicate their current state of health to generated a 5-digit number describing the health status (e.g., health status "11111" indicates the absence of problems in each dimension) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arnaud Dupeyron | Contact | 04.66.68.34.59 | arnaud.dupeyron@umontpellier.fr |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Arnaud Dupeyron | CHU Nîmes | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes | Nîmes | Gard | 30029 | France |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo | Drug | Placebo (normal saline solution and excipients described in Xeomin) will be injected in equally divided doses (1mL) into 2 locations in the affected buttock region |
|
| Baseline |
| Health-related quality of life | EuroQol-5 Dimension questionnaire measuring five items representing the five dimensions, and a visual analog scale graduated from 0 to 100 (100 referring to the "best possible state of health"). For each dimension, patients indicate their current state of health to generated a 5-digit number describing the health status (e.g., health status "11111" indicates the absence of problems in each dimension) | Week 6 |
| Health-related quality of life | EuroQol-5 Dimension questionnaire measuring five items representing the five dimensions, and a visual analog scale graduated from 0 to 100 (100 referring to the "best possible state of health"). For each dimension, patients indicate their current state of health to generated a 5-digit number describing the health status (e.g., health status "11111" indicates the absence of problems in each dimension) | Week 12 |
| Health-related quality of life | EuroQol-5 Dimension questionnaire measuring five items representing the five dimensions, and a visual analog scale graduated from 0 to 100 (100 referring to the "best possible state of health"). For each dimension, patients indicate their current state of health to generated a 5-digit number describing the health status (e.g., health status "11111" indicates the absence of problems in each dimension) | Week 18 |
| Health-related quality of life | EuroQol-5 Dimension questionnaire measuring five items representing the five dimensions, and a visual analog scale graduated from 0 to 100 (100 referring to the "best possible state of health"). For each dimension, patients indicate their current state of health to generated a 5-digit number describing the health status (e.g., health status "11111" indicates the absence of problems in each dimension) | Week 24 |
| Sciatic pain intensity | Assessed on Visual Analog Scale value (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain) | Baseline |
| Sciatic pain intensity | Assessed on Visual Analog Scale value (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain) | Week 3 |
| Sciatic pain intensity | Assessed on Visual Analog Scale value (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain) | Week 6 |
| Sciatic pain intensity | Assessed on Visual Analog Scale value (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain) | Week 9 |
| Sciatic pain intensity | Assessed on Visual Analog Scale value (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain) | Week 12 |
| Sciatic pain intensity | Assessed on Visual Analog Scale value (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain) | Week 15 |
| Sciatic pain intensity | Assessed on Visual Analog Scale value (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain) | Week 18 |
| Sciatic pain intensity | Assessed on Visual Analog Scale value (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain) | Week 21 |
| Sciatic pain intensity | Assessed on Visual Analog Scale value (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain) | Week 24 |
| Buttock pain intensity | Assessed on Visual Analog Scale value (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain) | Baseline |
| Buttock pain intensity | Assessed on Visual Analog Scale value (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain) | Week 3 |
| Buttock pain intensity | Assessed on Visual Analog Scale value (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain) | Week 6 |
| Buttock pain intensity | Assessed on Visual Analog Scale value (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain) | Week 9 |
| Buttock pain intensity | Assessed on Visual Analog Scale value (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain) | Week 12 |
| Buttock pain intensity | Assessed on Visual Analog Scale value (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain) | Week 15 |
| Buttock pain intensity | Assessed on Visual Analog Scale value (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain) | Week 18 |
| Buttock pain intensity | Assessed on Visual Analog Scale value (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain) | Week 21 |
| Buttock pain intensity | Assessed on Visual Analog Scale value (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain) | Week 24 |
| Physical functioning | Brief Pain Inventory Short Form; 9-item questionnaire, where Worst Pain Score: 1 - 4 = Mild Pain; Worst Pain Score: 5 - 6 = Moderate Pain; Worst Pain Score: 7 - 10 = Severe Pain | Baseline |
| Physical functioning | Brief Pain Inventory Short Form; 9-item questionnaire, where Worst Pain Score: 1 - 4 = Mild Pain; Worst Pain Score: 5 - 6 = Moderate Pain; Worst Pain Score: 7 - 10 = Severe Pain | Week 6 |
| Physical functioning | Brief Pain Inventory Short Form; 9-item questionnaire, where Worst Pain Score: 1 - 4 = Mild Pain; Worst Pain Score: 5 - 6 = Moderate Pain; Worst Pain Score: 7 - 10 = Severe Pain | Week 12 |
| Physical functioning | Brief Pain Inventory Short Form; 9-item questionnaire, where Worst Pain Score: 1 - 4 = Mild Pain; Worst Pain Score: 5 - 6 = Moderate Pain; Worst Pain Score: 7 - 10 = Severe Pain | Week 18 |
| Physical functioning | Brief Pain Inventory Short Form; 9-item questionnaire, where Worst Pain Score: 1 - 4 = Mild Pain; Worst Pain Score: 5 - 6 = Moderate Pain; Worst Pain Score: 7 - 10 = Severe Pain | Week 24 |
| Perceived change in condition in response to therapy | Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) | Baseline |
| Perceived change in condition in response to therapy | Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) | Week 6 |
| Perceived change in condition in response to therapy | Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) | Week 12 |
| Perceived change in condition in response to therapy | Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) | Week 18 |
| Perceived change in condition in response to therapy | Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) | Week 24 |
| Emotional distress | Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); 14 items, with responses scored on a scale of 0-3 (3 indicates higher symptom frequencies). Subscales (anxiety and depression) range from 0 to 21 whereby: normal 0-7, mild 8-10, moderate 11-14, and severe 15-21. | Baseline |
| Emotional distress | Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); 14 items, with responses scored on a scale of 0-3 (3 indicates higher symptom frequencies). Subscales (anxiety and depression) range from 0 to 21 whereby: normal 0-7, mild 8-10, moderate 11-14, and severe 15-21. | Week 6 |
| Emotional distress | Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); 14 items, with responses scored on a scale of 0-3 (3 indicates higher symptom frequencies). Subscales (anxiety and depression) range from 0 to 21 whereby: normal 0-7, mild 8-10, moderate 11-14, and severe 15-21. | Week 12 |
| Emotional distress | Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); 14 items, with responses scored on a scale of 0-3 (3 indicates higher symptom frequencies). Subscales (anxiety and depression) range from 0 to 21 whereby: normal 0-7, mild 8-10, moderate 11-14, and severe 15-21. | Week 18 |
| Emotional distress | Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); 14 items, with responses scored on a scale of 0-3 (3 indicates higher symptom frequencies). Subscales (anxiety and depression) range from 0 to 21 whereby: normal 0-7, mild 8-10, moderate 11-14, and severe 15-21. | Week 24 |
| Disability for low back pain | Oswestry Disability Index (ODI): range 0 to 100. Zero is equated with no disability and 100 is the maximum disability possible. | Baseline |
| Disability for low back pain | Oswestry Disability Index (ODI): range 0 to 100. Zero is equated with no disability and 100 is the maximum disability possible. | Week 6 |
| Disability for low back pain | Oswestry Disability Index (ODI): range 0 to 100. Zero is equated with no disability and 100 is the maximum disability possible. | Week 12 |
| Disability for low back pain | Oswestry Disability Index (ODI): range 0 to 100. Zero is equated with no disability and 100 is the maximum disability possible. | Week 18 |
| Disability for low back pain | Oswestry Disability Index (ODI): range 0 to 100. Zero is equated with no disability and 100 is the maximum disability possible. | Week 24 |
| Tolerance of the sitting position | Time between the beginning of the sitting position and the onset or worsening of the pain | Baseline |
| Tolerance of the sitting position | Time between the beginning of the sitting position and the onset or worsening of the pain | Week 6 |
| Tolerance of the sitting position | Time between the beginning of the sitting position and the onset or worsening of the pain | Week 12 |
| Tolerance of the sitting position | Time between the beginning of the sitting position and the onset or worsening of the pain | Week 18 |
| Tolerance of the sitting position | Time between the beginning of the sitting position and the onset or worsening of the pain | Week 24 |
| Consumption of painkillers | Number of level 1 to 3 analgesics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and muscle relaxants | Week 24 |
| Number of patients requiring a second injection botulinum toxin in each arm | Number | Week 12 |
| Side effects of injection | Side effects of the injection or attributable to the study drug | Week 24 |
| CHU de Besançon | Besançon | France |
|
| CHU de Bordeaux | Bordeaux | France |
|
| CHU de Nantes | Nantes | France |
|
| Hôpital Universitaire Paris Cochin | Paris | France |
|
| Institut Universitaire de Réadaptation Clémenceau | Strasbourg | France |
|
| CHU de Toulouse | Toulouse | France |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D055958 | Piriformis Muscle Syndrome |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020426 | Sciatic Neuropathy |
| D020422 | Mononeuropathies |
| D010523 | Peripheral Nervous System Diseases |
| D009468 | Neuromuscular Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D009408 | Nerve Compression Syndromes |
| D009437 | Neuralgia |
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D017699 | Pelvic Pain |
Not provided
Not provided