Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| The Texas Child Mental Health Care Consortium (TCMHCC) | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Bipolar disorder often runs in families, but early symptoms in youth can go unrecognized for years. This project evaluates a structured, family-centered approach to informed screening for youth ages 7-21 who have a biological parent with bipolar disorder.
The main questions addressed by this project are:
Whether a co-designed video decision aid improves caregiver understanding of bipolar disorder genetic risk and supports informed decisions about youth screening.
Whether remote mental health screening tools are feasible and acceptable for youth with familial risk for bipolar disorder.
Whether screening results can be used to identify early risk patterns and inform tailored follow-up recommendations.
Participants may be involved in one or more study activities, including co-design of educational decision-aid content, feedback on decision-aid prototypes, beta testing of the decision aid, and remote youth mental health screening. The study does not assign treatment and does not change existing clinical care or clinic routines.
Background and Rationale:
Bipolar disorder (BD), characterized by acute mood fluctuations between manic and depressive states, affects approximately 5.7 million adults each year in the United States and is the fourth leading cause of disability among those aged 10-24 worldwide. BD is estimated to inflict an annual economic burden of $195 billion in the United States alone. Despite its high prevalence and significant impact on both disability and the economy, BD is typically diagnosed 11-17 years after symptom emergence. This results in delayed intervention, increased morbidity, and an elevated suicide risk.
While the etiology of BD is unknown, there is substantial evidence suggesting that it is associated with genetic, epigenetic, and neurochemical factors. Heritability is well established. A child who has a biological parent with BD is at a 15-30% risk of developing the disorder, and the risk increases to 50-75% when both parents are affected. This familial risk is widely recognized and presents a compelling opportunity for preventive measures, particularly during the prodromal phase, prior to the realization of full diagnostic criteria.
Purpose:
The purpose of this research is to develop and evaluate a stakeholder-informed, scalable screening approach in a pilot feasibility study for early identification of mental health risk in youth (ages 7-21) who have a biological parent with bipolar disorder (BD). Despite well-documented genetic risk, there is currently no established protocol to support family-initiated screening in this high-risk group.
Objectives:
Hypothesis:
The hypothesis is that a family-centered, stakeholder-designed decision aid will encourage a significant portion of BD-affected adults or caregivers to consent to their children's screening and that adaptive screening will find youth with early symptom patterns that might benefit from further monitoring or risk-stratified follow-up. The goal is not to identify all at-risk youth, but rather to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary yield of this family-informed screening model.
This hypothesis is supported by evidence that early symptoms such as mood instability, anxiety, and behavioral dysregulation often precede the onset of full syndromal BD, particularly in youth with a biological parent diagnosed with BD. However, existing early identification models are largely clinician-driven, and families often lack tools to guide screening decisions. Decision aids, which are widely used in other areas of healthcare, have been shown to improve decision quality, reduce decisional conflict, and increase knowledge - particularly in situations involving uncertainty or personal values. There is strong evidence that decision-making informed by stakeholders enhances the relevance, uptake, and ethical alignment of initiatives, particularly when engaging families on sensitive or stigmatized clinical topics. Finally, recent research has shown that remote, adaptive mental health screening is feasible in high-risk youth populations. These results collectively substantiate the rationale for the piloting of a novel, family-centered approach that integrates stakeholder-informed decision assistance with adaptive screening and structured follow-up.
Overarching Study Goal:
The long-term goal of this work is to generate a scalable, evidence-based model for early detection of psychiatric risk in youth with a familial history of BD. By fostering informed caregiver engagement and incorporating risk-stratified follow-up recommendations, this project establishes the foundation for future practice guidelines that transition the field from reactive diagnosis to preventive mental health care. This approach is comparable to those employed in other heritable conditions, such as cancer and heart disease.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group A - Parent with Bipolar Disorder | Parents (age 18 or older) who have ever been diagnosed with bipolar disorder and have a biological child between the ages of 7-21 |
| |
| Group B - Adult Caregiver | Caregivers (age 18 or older) who are primarily responsible for a child between the ages of 7-21 whose biological parent has a lifetime diagnosis of bipolar disorder |
| |
| Group C - At-Risk Youth | Youth (ages 7-21) without bipolar disorder, but has at least 1 biological parent with a lifetime diagnosis of bipolar disorder |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Co-design Workshop (Observational Procedure) | Other | Participants in the workshop will help to co-design decision aid prototypes (short video and FAQ document) focused on early mental health screening for youth with one or more biological parents impacted by BD. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Decision Aid Acceptability Score | Mean participant rating of decision aid acceptability using study-specific Likert-type items assessing clarity, balance, trustworthiness, and usefulness. Items are rated from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating strongly disagree and 5 indicating strongly agree. Higher scores indicate greater acceptability. | 16 Months |
| Decision Aid Usability Score | Description: Mean participant rating of decision aid usability using study-specific Likert-type items assessing ease of navigation, visual clarity, and overall satisfaction. Items are rated from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating strongly disagree and 5 indicating strongly agree. Higher scores indicate greater usability. | 16 Months |
| Youth Screening Uptake Rate | Percentage of eligible caregivers who consent for youth mental health screening after participation in the decision-aid workflow. | 16 Months |
| Youth Screening Completion Rate | Percentage of youth participants who complete the assigned remote mental health screening battery after consent or permission and assent, as applicable. | 16 Months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Complete Youth Screening | Time in minutes required for youth participants to complete the assigned remote mental health screening battery. | 16 Months |
| Youth and Caregiver Post-Screening Feedback Score |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria for Group A - Parent with Bipolar Disorder:
Inclusion Criteria for Group B - Adult Caregiver:
Inclusion Criteria for Group C - At-Risk Youth:
Age:
Diagnosis status: Must not have a current diagnosis of Bipolar I or II disorder.
Parental diagnosis: Has at least 1 biological parent with a lifetime, clinician-confirmed Bipolar I or II diagnosis (as defined in Groups A and B).
Consent/Assent:
Participant ability: Able and willing to participate in study activities (e.g., co-design discussions, questionnaires, or screening assessments.
Language: English sufficient to comprehend study procedures and materials.
Criteria for Exclusion of Participants
A potential participant will NOT be eligible for participation in this study if any of the following criteria are met:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The following groups are being targeted for this observational study:
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karabi Nandy, Ph.D. | Contact | 214-648-4490 | FOCUSBipolar@UTSouthwestern.edu | |
| Karabi Nandy, Ph.D. | Contact | 214-648-9551 | FOCUSBipolar@UTSouthwestern.edu |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Karabi Nandy, PhD | University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UT Southwestern Medical Center | Recruiting | Dallas | Texas | 75390 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Alpha Testing (Observational Procedure) | Other | Participants will provide feedback on the initial version of the patient decision aid (short video and FAQ document). |
|
| Beta Testing (Observational Procedure) | Other | Participants will provide feedback on the refined version of the patient decision aid (short video and FAQ document). |
|
| Youth Screening Pathway & Brief Follow-Up Interview (Observational Procedure) | Other | Youth participants will take screening surveys for early bipolar risk detection. |
|
Mean post-screening feedback score from youth and caregiver surveys assessing clarity, comfort, perceived burden, and usefulness of the screening process. Items are rated from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating strongly disagree and 5 indicating strongly agree. Higher scores indicate more favorable feedback.
| 16 Months |
| Safety Flag Rate | Percentage of screened youth whose responses trigger the study safety protocol based on pre-specified screening thresholds. | 16 Months |
| Risk Stratification Category Distribution | Percentage of screened youth assigned to each pre-specified risk category based on the fixed-item and adaptive screening algorithm. Categories may include low, moderate, or elevated risk. | 16 Months |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001714 | Bipolar Disorder |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000068105 | Bipolar and Related Disorders |
| D019964 | Mood Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided