Effect of Graded Motor Imagery on Pressure Pain Threshold and Pain Intensity in Women With Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Effect of Graded Motor Imagery on Pressure Pain Threshold and Pain Intensity in Women With Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Randomized Controlled Trial
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if graded motor imagery can reduce pain sensitivity and period pain in women with primary dysmenorrhea (painful periods with no medical cause).
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Researchers will compare full GMI (active intervention), a sham GMI(inactive intervention), and a wait-list (no intervention) to see if GMI works better than the alternatives.
Participants will:
Women with primary dysmenorrhea have decreased pressure pain threshold (PPT) at local abdominal and lumbar sites and at remote sites (tibialis anterior). This is indicative of central sensitization, rather than just peripheral, prostaglandin-driven pain. This sensitization extends out of the menstrual window and is associated with increased pain catastrophizing (a cognitive-affective amplifier of central pain processing). All of these factors contribute to primary dysmenorrhea being an appropriate target for brain-directed intervention.
Graded Motor Imagery (GMI) is a three-phase physiotherapy program aimed at restoring the normal representation of pain in the cortex and reducing movement-related threat appraisal. Phases progress from implicit motor imagery using left/right body-part recognition tasks, followed by explicit mental rehearsal of pain-free movement. The third phase involves mirror therapy with visual feedback of normal movement. This sequenced approach targets the two measurable mechanisms underlying central sensitization in dysmenorrhea: altered pressure pain sensitivity and elevated pain catastrophizing. GMI has proven to be effective in complex regional pain syndrome, phantom limb pain, and genito-pelvic pain. However, it has not been specifically tested in primary dysmenorrhea.
This three-arm randomized controlled trial compares full GMI, sham GMI, and a wait-list control over six weeks of online-delivered sessions. The sham program is identical to GMI in terms of therapist contact time and structure of sessions, but employs non-pelvic imagery content (to control for non-specific effects of attention and engagement). The outcome is measured at baseline, 6 and 10 weeks by a blinded assessor.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: