Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHAMNA-2026-027 | Registry Identifier | Syrian Scientific Society for Medicinal Herbs (SHAMNA) | |
| MU-URO-260426-01 | Other Identifier | Manara University |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if propolis ointments work to improve dry, atopic-prone skin in adults. Propolis is a natural substance made by honeybees. It will also learn about the safety of these ointments.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does propolis ointment lower dryness, scaling, and roughness better than a base ointment with no propolis? Is there a difference between crude propolis and ethanolic extract of propolis (EEP)?
Researchers will compare three ointments to see if they improve skin condition:
A propolis ointment made with 3% ethanolic extract A propolis ointment made with 5% crude propolis A base ointment with no propolis (look-alike)
Participants will:
Apply the ointment to dry skin areas twice a day for 4 weeks Visit the clinic 4 times: for screening, at the start, at week 2, and at week 4 Have their skin checked by a researcher using a standard dryness score Answer questions about skin comfort, itching, and satisfaction Have a patch test before starting to check for allergy to propolis
This exploratory dermocosmetic study is a graduation project conducted by pharmacy students at Manara University in collaboration with the Syrian Scientific Society for Medicinal Herbs (SHAMNA). It evaluates two propolis-based ointments against a vehicle control in adults with atopic-prone dry skin.
STUDENT INVESTIGATORS:
Mahmoud Bitar, Haya Farhat, Nagham Saleh - supervised by Chadi Khatib, PhD, Faculty of Pharmacy, Manara University.
RATIONALE:
Atopic-prone dry skin presents with chronic dryness, scaling, roughness, mild itching, and impaired barrier function. In Syria and similar settings, topical corticosteroids are frequently used for minor skin conditions, often through over-the-counter combination products whose steroid content is not clearly labeled. This study addresses the need for evidence-based, non-steroidal alternatives for mild xerotic and atopic-prone skin.
INTERVENTIONS:
Three ointments are prepared under GMP-like conditions with identical packaging and appearance:
Propolis is standardized by total phenolic content, total flavonoid content, and HPLC fingerprinting (reference compounds: CAPE, artepillin C, galangin, pinocembrin).
DESIGN:
Randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, parallel-group. Allocation ratio 1:1:1. Computer-generated block randomization.
POPULATION:
Adults aged 18-60 years with atopic-prone dry skin or mild xerotic condition. Exclusion: acute eczema, infected dermatitis, psoriasis, known propolis/honey/lanolin allergy, pregnancy, breastfeeding, recent systemic corticosteroids (2 weeks), immunosuppressants (4 weeks), biologics (3 months), topical corticosteroids (1 week), topical calcineurin inhibitors (1 week), phototherapy (2 weeks).
PROCEDURES:
OUTCOMES:
Primary: Change in clinical dryness score (5-point scale: 0=None, 1=Very mild, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe) from baseline to Week 4, assessing dryness, scaling, and roughness.
Secondary: Pruritus VAS (0-10), skin comfort (Likert 1-5), cosmetic acceptability, subject satisfaction (Likert 1-5), standardized clinical photography.
SAFETY:
Erythema, burning, stinging, edema, allergic dermatitis, irritation at each visit. Adverse events: mild (continue), moderate (monitor), severe (discontinue).
ANALYSIS:
Mixed-effects repeated measures model, Tukey post hoc, Fisher exact or Chi-square for categorical variables. Significance: p < 0.05. Software: SPSS, GraphPad Prism.
SAMPLE SIZE: 30 participants (10 per group).
COMPLIANCE: Package weighing, patient diary, usage frequency. Poor compliance: <80% adherence.
ETHICS: Declaration of Helsinki, GCP. Written informed consent. Approved by Biomedical Ethics Committee, Syrian Scientific Society for Medicinal Herbs (SHAMNA), approval SHAMNA-2026-027.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEP Ointment 3% | Experimental | Ointment containing 3% ethanolic extract of propolis, white soft paraffin 67%, liquid paraffin 20%, anhydrous lanolin 10%. Applied twice daily for 4 weeks. |
|
| Crude Propolis Ointment 5% | Experimental | Ointment containing 5% micronized crude propolis, white soft paraffin 65%, liquid paraffin 20%, anhydrous lanolin 10%. Applied twice daily for 4 weeks. |
|
| Vehicle Ointment | Placebo Comparator | Base ointment containing white soft paraffin 70%, liquid paraffin 20%, anhydrous lanolin 10%. No propolis. Applied twice daily for 4 weeks. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ethanolic extract of propolis | Other | 3% ethanolic extract of propolis in ointment base |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Clinical Dryness Score | Clinical assessment of skin dryness, scaling, and roughness using a 5-point scale where 0=None, 1=Very mild, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe. Lower scores indicate improvement. | Baseline (Week 0) and Week 4 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pruritus Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | Self-reported itching intensity on a 0-10 scale, where 0=no itching and 10=worst possible itching. | Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, and Week 4 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Skin Comfort Assessment | Self-reported assessment of skin tightness, burning, soothing sensation, and softness using a Likert scale (1=Very uncomfortable, 5=Very comfortable). | Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, and Week 4 |
| Cosmetic Acceptability |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mahmoud Bitar, BPharm St. | Manara University | Study Director |
| Haya Farhat, BPharm St. | Manara University | Study Director |
| Nagham Saleh, BPharm St. | Manara University | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manara University, Faculty of Pharmacy | Latakia | Syria |
De-identified individual participant data, study protocol, statistical analysis plan, and informed consent form will be shared with other researchers following publication of primary results. Clinical photographs will be excluded from shared datasets to protect participant privacy.
Within 6 months following publication of primary results. Data will remain available indefinitely through the institutional repository.
Available to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal and agree to data use terms. Requests should be directed to the corresponding author at chadi.khatib@gmail.com
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003876 | Dermatitis, Atopic |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012873 | Skin Diseases, Genetic |
| D030342 | Genetic Diseases, Inborn |
| D009358 | Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities |
| D003872 | Dermatitis |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011429 | Propolis |
| D009823 | Ointment Bases |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012116 | Resins, Plant |
| D001704 | Biopolymers |
| D011108 | Polymers |
| D046911 | Macromolecular Substances |
Not provided
Not provided
Three parallel groups with no crossover between interventions.
Not provided
Not provided
All study personnel including the statistician are blinded. An independent pharmacist prepares coded packages.
| Crude propolis | Other | 5% micronized crude propolis in ointment base |
|
|
| Vehicle ointment | Other | Ointment base without propolis |
|
|
Self-reported assessment of ointment spreadability, greasiness, absorption, texture, and ease of application.
| Week 2 and Week 4 |
| Subject Satisfaction Score | Overall satisfaction with treatment using a Likert scale (1=Very dissatisfied, 5=Very satisfied). | Week 4 |
| Standardized Clinical Photography | Digital photography of affected skin areas under standardized lighting, distance, angle, and camera settings at baseline and Week 4 for visual comparison. | Baseline (Week 0) and Week 4 |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D017443 | Skin Diseases, Eczematous |
| D006969 | Hypersensitivity, Immediate |
| D006967 | Hypersensitivity |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
| D053147 |
| Plant Exudates |
| D001688 | Biological Products |
| D045424 | Complex Mixtures |
| D010592 | Pharmaceutic Aids |
| D004364 | Pharmaceutical Preparations |
| D020313 | Specialty Uses of Chemicals |
| D020164 | Chemical Actions and Uses |