Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| N°ID-RCB : 2025-A00441-48 | Other Identifier | ANSM (The National Agency for Drug and Health Product Safety) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Difficulty orienting oneself and finding one's way around the environment, also known as "topographical disorientation" (TD) or "spatial disorientation" (SD), is a common and often early symptom of Alzheimer's disease (AD) that affects people's independence and well-being. Being able to identify it is therefore crucial in order to provide appropriate support.
It cannot be assessed using conventional psychometric tests due to its low ecological validity. Several subjective assessment scales have been created to screen for SD "spatial disorientation" and assess its functional and psychological impact. However, none of these scales have been translated and validated in French. As a result, DS is not assessed in routine clinical practice.
Among these scales, the Wayfinding Questionnaire (WQ) explores three dimensions: spatial orientation, distance estimation, and spatial anxiety. This questionnaire has undergone psychometric validation studies in its original Dutch version for a population with mild post-stroke , and norms for the general population have been published.
Our team translated this questionnaire into French (i.e., "Questionnaire d'Orientation Spatiale" (QOS)) and adapted it cross-culturally to preserve the qualities of the measurement. A "Caregiver" version was also created, taking into account the anosognosia known to occur in AD. Primary Objective : Evaluate the psychometric properties of the Spatial Orientation Questionnaire (SOSQ) (i.e., the French translation and adaptation of the Wayfinding Questionnaire) in assessing spatial orientation disorders in patients with Alzheimer's disease, in both its "patient" and "caregiver" versions. Secondary objective : Evaluate the acceptability of the Spatial Orientation Questionnaire (SOC) in its "patient" and "caregiver" versions.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients Group | Patients with Alzheimer disease |
| |
| Accompanying persons | Relatives (friends or family) of patients with alzheimer disease |
| |
| Control arm | Healthy participants |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Questionnaire d'Orientation Spatiale (QOS) | Diagnostic Test | French version of the wayfinding questionnaire |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| French version of the QOS Score | There are three sub-scores in total :
For these three sub-scores, a high score indicates a good level of spatial orientation. | Baseline and between 30 and 90 days after baseline for groups A1, A2, A3, B1 and B2 |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
For all subjects :
Patients (Subgroup A1) and healthy control subjects (Group C):
Patients (group A):
Caregivers (group B):
Exclusion Criteria:
For all subjects:
Patients (subgroup A1) and healthy control subjects (group C):
Not provided
Not provided
Patients with Alzheimer disease and their caregivers
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EL AKHDAR Hajar, Master Science | Contact | 0383153596 | h.elakhdar@chru-nancy.fr |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHRU (Centre Hospitalier Régionale Universitaire) Nancy | Nancy | 54500 | France |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8263569 | Background | Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Dec;46(12):1417-32. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-n. | |
| 25698408 | Background | Epstein J, Santo RM, Guillemin F. A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Apr;68(4):435-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.021. Epub 2014 Dec 17. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000072458 | Orientation, Spatial |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013037 | Spatial Behavior |
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 11124735 | Background | Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3186-91. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014. No abstract available. |
| 36129157 | Background | van der Ham IJM, Claessen MHG. A clinical guide to assessment of navigation impairment: Standardized subjective and objective instruments and normative data. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2022 Sep;44(7):487-498. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2022.2123895. Epub 2022 Sep 21. |
| 28720024 | Background | de Rooij NK, Claessen MHG, van der Ham IJM, Post MWM, Visser-Meily JMA. The Wayfinding Questionnaire: A clinically useful self-report instrument to identify navigation complaints in stroke patients. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2019 Aug;29(7):1042-1061. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2017.1347098. Epub 2017 Jul 18. |
| 23615778 | Background | van der Ham IJ, Kant N, Postma A, Visser-Meily JM. Is navigation ability a problem in mild stroke patients? Insights from self-reported navigation measures. J Rehabil Med. 2013 May;45(5):429-33. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1139. |
| 27506237 | Background | Claessen MHG, Visser-Meily JMA, de Rooij NK, Postma A, van der Ham IJM. The Wayfinding Questionnaire as a Self-report Screening Instrument for Navigation-related Complaints After Stroke: Internal Validity in Healthy Respondents and Chronic Mild Stroke Patients. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2016 Dec 1;31(8):839-854. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acw044. |
| Background | Hegarty, M., Montello, D. R., Richardson, A. E., Ishikawa, T., & Lovelace, K. (2006). Spatial abilities at different scales : Individual differences in aptitude-test performance and spatial-layout learning. Intelligence, 34(2), 151-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2005.09.005 |