Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Universidad Miguel Hernandez de Elche | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
RIDECLAS is an observational, prospective, non-interventional consensus study using a modified Delphi methodology. The study aims to obtain expert consensus on the classification and final formulation of recommendations for the RICA Pathway, an enhanced recovery pathway for adult surgery. Participants will be healthcare professionals with experience in enhanced recovery, perioperative medicine, surgery, anesthesiology, nursing, rehabilitation, or related disciplines. Experts will complete sequential online questionnaires. Individual responses will remain confidential, and aggregated anonymized feedback will be provided between Delphi rounds. The study does not involve patients, clinical interventions, biological samples, drugs, or medical devices.
This study will use a modified Delphi process conducted remotely through electronic questionnaires. A coordinating committee will prepare an initial list of recommendations based on the previous RICA Pathway document and updated evidence. Expert panelists will rate each recommendation using a 1-to-9 Likert scale and may provide free-text comments. Two Delphi rounds are planned, with a third round if needed for items without sufficient consensus or for reformulated statements. Between rounds, participants will receive aggregated and anonymized feedback, including measures of agreement, median scores, dispersion, and a summary of comments. Consensus for acceptance is predefined as at least 75% of ratings in the 7-9 range and no more than 15% in the 1-3 range. Consensus for rejection is predefined as at least 75% of ratings in the 1-3 range and no more than 15% in the 7-9 range. Items not meeting consensus criteria may be reassessed in subsequent rounds. The analysis will be descriptive and will include response rates, attrition between rounds, item-level agreement, median scores, interquartile ranges, and qualitative thematic review of comments.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expert Panel | Healthcare professionals with experience in enhanced recovery pathways, perioperative medicine, surgery, anesthesiology, nursing, rehabilitation, or related disciplines who are invited to participate in the modified Delphi process. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modified Delphi questionnaire | Other | Sequential online questionnaires used to rate and classify proposed RICA Pathway recommendations. This is not a clinical intervention and does not involve patient care, drugs, devices, or invasive procedures. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Expert consensus on RICA Pathway recommendations | Consensus will be assessed for each recommendation using predefined Delphi criteria. Acceptance consensus will be defined as at least 75% of ratings in the 7-9 range and no more than 15% in the 1-3 range. Rejection consensus will be defined as at least 75% of ratings in the 1-3 range and no more than 15% in the 7-9 range. | Through study completion, up to 7 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Degree of agreement for each recommendation | Distribution of ratings, median score, interquartile range, and percentage of ratings in predefined agreement/disagreement ranges. | After each Delphi round, up to 7 months. |
| Stability of ratings between Delphi rounds |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
At least 5 years of professional experience. Membership in GERM or participation in professional networks related to enhanced recovery in adult surgery.
Willingness to participate in the planned Delphi rounds. Provision of electronic informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study population will consist of healthcare professionals and scientific society members with experience in enhanced recovery pathways, perioperative medicine, surgery, anesthesiology, nursing, rehabilitation, or related disciplines. Participants will be invited from the Grupo Español de Rehabilitación Multimodal (GERM) and related professional networks.
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| José-Manuel Ramírez Rodríguez, Professor of Surgery | Contact | +34 976 556400 | jramirez@unizar.es |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Department of Surgery | Zaragoza | Zaragoza | 50009 | Spain |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background | Grupo de trabajo. Vía Clínica de Recuperación Intensificada en Cirugía del Adulto (RICA). Grupo Español de Rehabilitación Multimodal (GERM); 2026. Available at: https://grupogerm.es/via-rica-web/ | ||
| 31066889 | Background | Ripolles-Melchor J, Ramirez-Rodriguez JM, Casans-Frances R, Aldecoa C, Abad-Motos A, Logrono-Egea M, Garcia-Erce JA, Camps-Cervantes A, Ferrando-Ortola C, Suarez de la Rica A, Cuellar-Martinez A, Marmana-Mezquita S, Abad-Gurumeta A, Calvo-Vecino JM; POWER Study Investigators Group for the Spanish Perioperative Audit and Research Network (REDGERM). Association Between Use of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol and Postoperative Complications in Colorectal Surgery: The Postoperative Outcomes Within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol (POWER) Study. JAMA Surg. 2019 Aug 1;154(8):725-736. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0995. | |
| 14667752 |
Not provided
Not provided
Individual participant data will not be shared. This is a modified Delphi consensus study involving expert panelists rather than patients. Individual responses will be treated confidentially, stored in coded form, and analyzed and reported only in aggregate. Sharing individual-level responses could compromise participant confidentiality and may affect the independence of expert judgment in the Delphi process. Aggregated results, consensus levels, and methodological details will be reported in the final publication.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Descriptive assessment of changes in item-level ratings and consensus status between rounds. |
| Between round 1 and round 2, and round 3 if performed, up to 7 months. |
| Response rate and attrition between rounds | Number and percentage of invited experts who complete each round, and percentage lost between rounds. | After each Delphi round, up to 7 months. |
| Qualitative analysis of expert comments | Thematic review of free-text comments to support item reformulation and interpretation of items without consensus. | After each Delphi round, up to 7 months. |
| Background |
| Kehlet H, Dahl JB. Anaesthesia, surgery, and challenges in postoperative recovery. Lancet. 2003 Dec 6;362(9399):1921-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14966-5. |
| 38261576 | Background | Gattrell WT, Logullo P, van Zuuren EJ, Price A, Hughes EL, Blazey P, Winchester CC, Tovey D, Goldman K, Hungin AP, Harrison N. ACCORD (ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document): A reporting guideline for consensus methods in biomedicine developed via a modified Delphi. PLoS Med. 2024 Jan 23;21(1):e1004326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004326. eCollection 2024 Jan. |