Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study evaluates the pulse oximetry (SpOâ‚‚) sensor for clinical performance, form, and fit in hospitalized infants and children (28 days to 12 years). It compares SpOâ‚‚ measurements from the device to arterial oxygen saturation (SaOâ‚‚) values from arterial CO-oximetry, and assesses the reliability of usable data, performance across skin tones, and user feedback.
This prospective clinical study evaluates a pulse oximetry sensor in hospitalized infants (28 days to 23 months) and children (2-12 years) under routine clinical conditions. The primary objective is to assess the accuracy and agreement of SpOâ‚‚ measurements compared with reference SaOâ‚‚ values obtained from CO-oximetry analysis of simultaneously drawn arterial blood, using methods aligned with ISO 80601-2-61: 2026 3rd edition published in April 2026.
Secondary objectives include measuring the proportion of time the device produces invalid or unusable data to assess reliability for clinical use. The safety objective is to collect safety information, including type and number of AEs, SAEs, and device issues. Results may support product development, regulatory submissions, and marketing activities.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Subjects | Experimental | Participants participating in this study will be connected to SpO2 sensors. SpO2 data will be independently collected from each sensor and paired with simultaneous arterial blood sample SaOâ‚‚ values. The protocol is consistent with the ISO 80601-2-61 pulse oximetry standard. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SpO2 Sensor | Device | SpO2 sensors use red and infrared LED light to estimate the arterial oxygen saturation. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Collection of SpO2 Percentage Sensor Data with simultaneous SaO2 values | The collection of SpO2 percentage sensor data with simultaneous SaO2 values percentage from each subject enrolled in the study. | From enrollment to the end of standard of care arterial cannulation, approximately 1 week. |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of Safety Events | Analysis of adverse events will be listed per subject, summarized with counts and percentages of events, and summarized with counts and percentages of subjects with events. | 4 months |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Nebraska Medical Center Children's Hospital | Omaha | Nebraska | 68114 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17613642 | Background | Bland JM, Altman DG. Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual. J Biopharm Stat. 2007;17(4):571-82. doi: 10.1080/10543400701329422. | |
| 36939727 | Background | Ruppel H, Makeneni S, Faerber JA, Lane-Fall MB, Foglia EE, O'Byrne ML, Bonafide CP. Evaluating the Accuracy of Pulse Oximetry in Children According to Race. JAMA Pediatr. 2023 May 1;177(5):540-543. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.0071. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 34772785 | Background | Okunlola OE, Lipnick MS, Batchelder PB, Bernstein M, Feiner JR, Bickler PE. Pulse Oximeter Performance, Racial Inequity, and the Work Ahead. Respir Care. 2022 Feb;67(2):252-257. doi: 10.4187/respcare.09795. Epub 2021 Nov 12. |
| 15791098 | Background | Bickler PE, Feiner JR, Severinghaus JW. Effects of skin pigmentation on pulse oximeter accuracy at low saturation. Anesthesiology. 2005 Apr;102(4):715-9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200504000-00004. |