Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this observational study is to learn if embryo characteristics obtained via the recording of real-time embryo activity via 30-seconds video capture (e.g.: Embryo Morphokinetics) can correlate with known embryo outcome in patients receiving In-Vitro Fertilization Treatment (IVF).
Current Embryo morphology is performed with direct observation of embryo characteristics under the microscope. The observer will follow embryo grading standards based on embryo symmetry, development stage and growth pattern based on day of culture, presence of defined embryo characteristics with definition of viability to transfer into the uterus, cryopreserve for future use or discard.
Today, the final embryo outcome can be correlated with the subjective embryo grading performed by the embryologist to evaluate how precise is the viability assessment of embryo characteristics and potential.
This observational study attempts to create enough data to evaluate if real-time embryo morphokinetics can correlate with known outcomes. Patients participating in this study will not obtain any benefit from the recording of their embryos. They'll continue with their treatment according to the medical provider decision. Embryos will be selected using standard of care practice including:
Transfer into the uterus. Cryopreservation. Biopsy for pre-implantation genetic testing and cryopreservation. Discard. The data obtained from this study will be analyzed to generate hypothesis and potentially design a prospective study where this tool can be used to aid in the embryo grading and selection process in comparison with standard of care.
The study includes patients undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) including IVF, Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI), Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer including or not Embryos previously analyzed genetically. This includes embryos already defined as viable (genetically normal) or embryos to be discarded (genetically abnormal).
What is Embryo Morphokinetics? Embryos are in constant movement with cellular activity invisible to the naked eye. Capturing a real-time video can convert that cellular movement and activity into pixels. Those pixels can be followed, and certain patterns can be observed and created. With the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) those patterns can be identified, labelled, and analyzed to potentially be correlated with embryo outcome. It has been demonstrated, in the animal field, that embryos with certain morphokinetics patterns do not implant inside the uterus therefore not achieving a pregnancy. Also, embryos with high activity may be associated with genetic abnormality.
In this study the following comparisons will be performed.
Embryo Morphokinetics at the Blastocyst stage including:
Blastocyst morphokinetics before cryopreservation and after thawing. Blastocyst morphokinetics before and after trophectoderm biopsy. Blastocyst morphokinetics in euploid embryos before transfer. Blastocyst morphokinetics in aneuploid embryos before discard.
BACKGROUND Assisted reproductive technologies encompass a range of medical and laboratory procedures designed to facilitate fertilization and embryo implantation when natural conception is not possible or practical. Despite continuous technological progress, successful pregnancy following embryo transfer remains uncertain. Registry data demonstrate that implantation and live birth rates remain moderate rather than guaranteed outcomes. For example, data reported by the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) demonstrated an overall clinical pregnancy rate of approximately 45.7% per transfer in the United States in 2020, while European registry data published by the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) reported pregnancy rates of approximately 34% per embryo transfer cycle.
Given these limitations, improving embryo selection represents one of the most important opportunities to enhance ART efficiency. Identification of embryos with the highest developmental competence could reduce the number of treatment cycles required to achieve pregnancy, minimize patient exposure to repeated procedures, and decrease overall societal and healthcare expenditures. Consequently, substantial research efforts have focused on developing objective biomarkers capable of predicting embryo implantation potential.
Currently, embryo selection in most IVF laboratories relies predominantly on morphological assessment at the blastocyst stage. Key parameters include blastocoel expansion, trophectoderm cell appearance, and inner cell mass organization, as described in standardized grading systems such as the Gardner classification.
Although morphology correlates with implantation potential, assessment depends on visual interpretation by trained embryologists and therefore remains inherently subjective and operator-dependent, limiting reproducibility across centers.
The present observational study is designed to generate clinical and technical performance data necessary to support hypothesis development and future regulatory evaluation of an embryo image-assessment technology. Clinical performance evaluation must demonstrate reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness in predicting embryo developmental potential. Device performance will therefore be evaluated through measures including classification accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value at both embryo and patient levels.
Evaluation of the AI-based morphokinetic analysis tool will include verification, validation, and risk assessment processes consistent with FDA expectations for software contained in medical devices.
EMBRYO IMAGING Embryo imaging has been incorporated into in-vitro fertilization (IVF) laboratories since the earliest development of assisted reproductive technologies. Initial documentation methods relied on photographic film attached to light microscopes, producing static images that were subsequently developed as slides or printed photographs for clinical records and educational purposes. Analog imaging systems, including thermal paper printers adapted from ultrasonography platforms, were later adopted to facilitate routine embryo documentation. Prior to the digital era, real-time visualization of gametes and embryos was achievable through analog video microscopy systems, with recordings stored using conventional videotape technology.
The transition to digital microscopy represented a major technological advancement, allowing rapid acquisition, storage, and retrieval of high-resolution embryo images and videos. Digital capture systems improved laboratory documentation practices and enabled retrospective evaluation of embryo development without substantially altering standard culture conditions.
Subsequently, time-lapse incubation (TLI) systems were introduced into IVF laboratories with the objective of enabling continuous embryo monitoring while maintaining uninterrupted culture conditions. These systems integrate microscopy and imaging software within incubators, allowing sequential image acquisition throughout preimplantation development.
Investigators proposed that morphokinetic parameters derived from time-lapse imaging could identify embryos capable of achieving key developmental milestones and cell-cycle checkpoints associated with implantation competence.
Despite strong theoretical advantages, accumulated clinical evidence and systematic reviews have not consistently demonstrated improved live birth outcomes when TLI systems are compared with conventional bench-top tri-gas incubation combined with standard morphological assessment. As a result, the clinical superiority of time-lapse incubation for routine embryo selection remains uncertain.
Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and computer vision have renewed interest in non-invasive embryo assessment through real-time morphokinetic analysis. Automated image interpretation systems capable of extracting dynamic developmental features may provide objective and reproducible embryo evaluation while reducing operator dependency. Notably, AI-assisted embryo assessment methodologies have been successfully implemented for decades in animal reproduction, particularly within the bovine embryo transfer industry. In this setting, large numbers of embryos have been evaluated using stereomicroscopy combined with digital or mobile video acquisition to assess developmental kinetics and morphological dynamics associated with implantation success.
Experience gained from animal reproductive biotechnology has historically served as a foundation for innovation in human ART. Several core technologies currently used in clinical IVF-including embryo cryopreservation, culture media optimization, and micromanipulation techniques-were initially developed and validated in animal models before translation into human reproductive medicine.
Building upon these translational precedents, the present study seeks to generate structured imaging datasets suitable for development and validation of machine-learning algorithms capable of predicting embryo developmental competence in human IVF. Establishment of robust, standardized video-based datasets may enable creation of scalable AI-driven decision-support tools applicable across IVF laboratories worldwide, with the potential to improve embryo selection consistency and clinical efficiency while maintaining non-invasive assessment principles.
STUDY DESIGN METHODOLOGY This investigation is designed as a prospective, observational, non-interventional study. The study population will include individuals undergoing assisted reproductive treatment between 18 and 45 years of age who generate at least one embryo reaching the blastocyst stage following five, six, or seven days of in-vitro embryo culture.
Eligible participants will consist of patients or couples who voluntarily agree to participate and provide written informed consent using an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved Informed Consent Form (ICF). Potential participants will be informed of the study objectives, procedures, and voluntary nature of participation at the initiation of fertility treatment. Adequate time will be provided for review of the consent document and for discussion with clinical or research personnel prior to enrollment, consistent with ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines.
Participation in this study will not modify clinical management, controlled ovarian stimulation protocols, laboratory culture conditions, or embryo transfer decision-making. Patients retain the unrestricted right to withdraw consent at any time without penalty or impact on medical care, physician-patient relationships, or access to fertility treatment services.
Participants enrolled in the study will undergo standard assisted reproductive treatment, including controlled ovarian stimulation (COS), transvaginal ultrasound-guided follicular aspiration for oocyte retrieval, and fertilization performed according to routine embryology laboratory practices. Insemination will be conducted using conventional in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), based on established clinical and laboratory indications.
Following fertilization, embryos will be cultured under validated laboratory conditions maintaining strict control of temperature, pH stability, and gas composition consistent with established IVF laboratory standards designed to optimize embryo development. Embryos will be cultured until transfer, cryopreservation, or disposition according to routine clinical practice.
At the blastocyst stage (day 5, 6, or 7 of development), and immediately prior to embryo transfer or cryopreservation, a brief real-time microscopic video recording of approximately thirty seconds will be obtained. Video acquisition will occur following routine blastocyst imaging already performed for clinical documentation and embryo transfer reporting purposes. All patients routinely receive standard blastocyst images as part of clinical care.
The only study-related deviation from routine laboratory procedures consists of an additional estimated 15-20 seconds of light exposure during video capture.
Imaging will be performed using an inverted microscope equipped with a temperature-controlled stage to maintain physiological culture conditions throughout observation. The embryo will remain within a microdroplet of culture medium covered by mineral oil, thereby preserving osmolarity, temperature stability, and pH buffering during the brief observation interval.
Short-term microscopic exposure under controlled laboratory conditions has been demonstrated to be compatible with embryo viability when environmental stability is maintained and exposure duration remains limited. Accordingly, the additional imaging time introduced by this observational protocol is not expected to adversely affect embryo development or clinical outcomes.
PARTICIPANT POPULATION
Participant recruitment for this observational study will be conducted according to the following procedures:
No additional recruitment strategies, advertising, or external enrollment methods will be employed for this study.
This investigation will be conducted in accordance with internationally recognized ethical and regulatory standards, including the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki, the Belmont Report, and the International Council for Harmonization (ICH) Guideline for Good Clinical Practice (E6[R2]). The study will comply with applicable United States federal regulations governing human subjects research, including the Common Rule (45 CFR Part 46), as well as requirements under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) for protection of participant privacy and confidentiality.
Participating institutions may determine enrollment targets based on clinical capacity and study feasibility considerations.
Patients enrolled in this study won't receive any benefit for participating. No result will be given to patients regarding the morphokinetic characteristics of their embryos. In other words, no decision making will be influenced for performing this evaluation.
The VIABLE-AIM study does not currently utilize a clinically validated embryo scoring system or diagnostic algorithm. At the present stage of development, the study is observational and exploratory in nature and is designed to evaluate whether quantitative morphokinetic features extracted from short-duration blastocyst videos are associated with known embryo characteristics and reproductive outcomes.
The current analytical approach consists primarily of non-machine-learning statistical analysis of normalized pixel activity over time derived from approximately 30-second real-time microscopic embryo videos. Video processing methods include background subtraction and frame-by-frame quantification of temporal pixel-intensity changes.
From these processed video signals, multiple quantitative morphokinetic variables may be extracted, including but not limited to:
Mean activity Standard deviation of activity Peak count Valley count Peak amplitude Temporal fluctuation patterns Burst activity metrics Coordinated rhythmicity measurements Additional descriptive statistical features derived from normalized activity curves These variables are analyzed for potential associations with known embryo outcomes, including implantation outcome, pregnancy outcome, and chromosomal status when available. At the current stage, these measurements are exploratory research variables only and are not used for clinical decision-making, embryo selection, or patient management.
The study does not currently generate a validated clinical "Viable AIM Score." Any references to "AIM score" within the protocol represent a conceptual or investigational framework rather than an established diagnostic classifier. The present study is intended to generate foundational datasets necessary for future model development and hypothesis generation.
Model development may include training supervised machine-learning or deep-learning models using outcome-linked datasets generated in this study. Potential model architectures under evaluation for future research include:
Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks Transformer-based architectures Other spatiotemporal deep-learning approaches These future models may ultimately generate probabilistic confidence outputs representing the likelihood of predefined outcomes (for example implantation potential or euploid status), typically expressed on a normalized scale between 0 and 1. However, such models are currently investigational, have not been clinically validated in humans, and are not being used prospectively in patient care within the current study.
The purpose of the present study is therefore to establish feasibility, characterize morphokinetic signal patterns, and generate structured datasets suitable for future validation studies and regulatory evaluation of AI-assisted embryo assessment technologies.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) | Patients meeting inclusion exclusion criteria undergoing ART. This includes In-Vitro Fertilization with embryo transfer, Frozen-Thawed embryo transfer with and without pre-implantation genetic testing. Single blastocyst to be transferred will be video recorded using conventional inverted microscope, camera and recording software during 30 seconds before embryo transfer, before and after blastocyst biopsy and after blastocyst thawing. |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Ongoing Clinical Pregnancy | Evaluate the association between the AI assisted blastocyst Morphokinetic extracted from a 30 seconds blastocyst video recording and ongoing clinical pregnancy. | From enrollment and embryo morphokinetic evaluation to ongoing clinical pregnancy evaluated at 12 weeks of pregnancy in pregnant patients. |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
The study will enroll patients undergoing ART who generate at least one blastocyst on day 5, 6, or 7 of in-vitro culture. All participants will receive clinical management according to the treating physician's judgment and the established clinical and laboratory protocols of the IVF center. Participation in this observational study will not modify medical treatment, laboratory procedures, or clinical decision-making, and no additional interventions affecting patient care will be introduced. Eligibility for study participation requires a thirty-second real-time video recording. Blastocysts recorded may originate from conventional IVF or ICSI cycles, frozen-thawed embryo transfers, or embryos undergoing biopsy for PGT-A. Each recorded embryo will be appropriately coded to document developmental stage, embryo status (fresh or frozen-thawed), and genetic testing classification when available, including chromosomal designation and reported sex determination where applicable.
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Women's Specialty & Fertility Center | Clovis | California | 93611 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37588797 | Background | Salih M, Austin C, Warty RR, Tiktin C, Rolnik DL, Momeni M, Rezatofighi H, Reddy S, Smith V, Vollenhoven B, Horta F. Embryo selection through artificial intelligence versus embryologists: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Open. 2023 Aug 15;2023(3):hoad031. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoad031. eCollection 2023. | |
| 30690654 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
This study doesn't require to share IPD due to the nature of its design based on embryo morphokinetics.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007246 | Infertility |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Curchoe CL, Bormann CL. Artificial intelligence and machine learning for human reproduction and embryology presented at ASRM and ESHRE 2018. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Apr;36(4):591-600. doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01408-x. Epub 2019 Jan 28. |
| 30054845 | Background | Simopoulou M, Sfakianoudis K, Maziotis E, Antoniou N, Rapani A, Anifandis G, Bakas P, Bolaris S, Pantou A, Pantos K, Koutsilieris M. Are computational applications the "crystal ball" in the IVF laboratory? The evolution from mathematics to artificial intelligence. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 Sep;35(9):1545-1557. doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1266-6. Epub 2018 Jul 27. |
| 32240301 | Background | VerMilyea M, Hall JMM, Diakiw SM, Johnston A, Nguyen T, Perugini D, Miller A, Picou A, Murphy AP, Perugini M. Development of an artificial intelligence-based assessment model for prediction of embryo viability using static images captured by optical light microscopy during IVF. Hum Reprod. 2020 Apr 28;35(4):770-784. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa013. |
| 28158511 | Background | Harper J, Jackson E, Sermon K, Aitken RJ, Harbottle S, Mocanu E, Hardarson T, Mathur R, Viville S, Vail A, Lundin K. Adjuncts in the IVF laboratory: where is the evidence for 'add-on' interventions? Hum Reprod. 2017 Mar 1;32(3):485-491. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex004. |
| 23731996 | Background | Scott RT Jr, Upham KM, Forman EJ, Hong KH, Scott KL, Taylor D, Tao X, Treff NR. Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2013 Sep;100(3):697-703. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.04.035. Epub 2013 Jun 1. |
| 24578475 | Background | Capalbo A, Rienzi L, Cimadomo D, Maggiulli R, Elliott T, Wright G, Nagy ZP, Ubaldi FM. Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts. Hum Reprod. 2014 Jun;29(6):1173-81. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu033. Epub 2014 Feb 26. |
| 20570214 | Background | Swain JE. Optimizing the culture environment in the IVF laboratory: impact of pH and buffer capacity on gamete and embryo quality. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010 Jul;21(1):6-16. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.03.012. Epub 2010 Mar 21. |
| 17090393 | Background | Lane M, Gardner DK. Embryo culture medium: which is the best? Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2007 Feb;21(1):83-100. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.09.009. Epub 2006 Nov 7. |
| 24141714 | Background | World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053. No abstract available. |
| 34173914 | Background | Kragh MF, Karstoft H. Embryo selection with artificial intelligence: how to evaluate and compare methods? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 Jul;38(7):1675-1689. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02254-6. Epub 2021 Jun 26. |
| 31111884 | Background | Tran D, Cooke S, Illingworth PJ, Gardner DK. Deep learning as a predictive tool for fetal heart pregnancy following time-lapse incubation and blastocyst transfer. Hum Reprod. 2019 Jun 4;34(6):1011-1018. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez064. |
| 31304368 | Background | Khosravi P, Kazemi E, Zhan Q, Malmsten JE, Toschi M, Zisimopoulos P, Sigaras A, Lavery S, Cooper LAD, Hickman C, Meseguer M, Rosenwaks Z, Elemento O, Zaninovic N, Hajirasouliha I. Deep learning enables robust assessment and selection of human blastocysts after in vitro fertilization. NPJ Digit Med. 2019 Apr 4;2:21. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0096-y. eCollection 2019. |
| 21828117 | Background | Meseguer M, Herrero J, Tejera A, Hilligsoe KM, Ramsing NB, Remohi J. The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo implantation. Hum Reprod. 2011 Oct;26(10):2658-71. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der256. Epub 2011 Aug 9. |
| 16289262 | Background | Vajta G, Kuwayama M. Improving cryopreservation systems. Theriogenology. 2006 Jan 7;65(1):236-44. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.09.026. Epub 2005 Nov 9. |
| 26566159 | Background | Lonergan P, Fair T. Maturation of Oocytes in Vitro. Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2016;4:255-68. doi: 10.1146/annurev-animal-022114-110822. Epub 2015 Nov 9. |
| 20890283 | Background | Wong CC, Loewke KE, Bossert NL, Behr B, De Jonge CJ, Baer TM, Reijo Pera RA. Non-invasive imaging of human embryos before embryonic genome activation predicts development to the blastocyst stage. Nat Biotechnol. 2010 Oct;28(10):1115-21. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1686. Epub 2010 Oct 3. |
| 22975113 | Background | Meseguer M, Rubio I, Cruz M, Basile N, Marcos J, Requena A. Embryo incubation and selection in a time-lapse monitoring system improves pregnancy outcome compared with a standard incubator: a retrospective cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2012 Dec;98(6):1481-9.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.08.016. Epub 2012 Sep 10. |
| 29800485 | Background | Armstrong S, Bhide P, Jordan V, Pacey A, Farquhar C. Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 25;5(5):CD011320. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011320.pub3. |
| 26345684 | Background | Gameiro S, Boivin J, Dancet E, de Klerk C, Emery M, Lewis-Jones C, Thorn P, Van den Broeck U, Venetis C, Verhaak CM, Wischmann T, Vermeulen N. ESHRE guideline: routine psychosocial care in infertility and medically assisted reproduction-a guide for fertility staff. Hum Reprod. 2015 Nov;30(11):2476-85. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev177. Epub 2015 Sep 7. |
| 28760517 | Background | Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, Dyer S, Racowsky C, de Mouzon J, Sokol R, Rienzi L, Sunde A, Schmidt L, Cooke ID, Simpson JL, van der Poel S. The International Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care, 2017. Fertil Steril. 2017 Sep;108(3):393-406. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.06.005. Epub 2017 Jul 29. |
| 36483694 | Background | Cox CM, Thoma ME, Tchangalova N, Mburu G, Bornstein MJ, Johnson CL, Kiarie J. Infertility prevalence and the methods of estimation from 1990 to 2021: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Open. 2022 Nov 12;2022(4):hoac051. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoac051. eCollection 2022. |
| 38204956 | Background | Paulson RJ. Is preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) getting better? How can we know and how do we counsel our patients? F S Rep. 2023 Nov 8;4(4):329-330. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2023.11.002. eCollection 2023 Dec. No abstract available. |
| 39242260 | Background | Cairo Consensus Group 2023, Alpha Scientists In Reproductive Medicine. Cairo Consensus on Accreditation as the Basis for Future-Proofing the ART Laboratory. Reprod Biomed Online. 2025 Jan;50(1):104106. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104106. Epub 2024 May 13. |
| 10856474 | Background | Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 2000 Jun;73(6):1155-8. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00518-5. |
| Background | Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB. In vitro culture of human blastocysts. In: Toward Reproductive Certainty: Fertility and Genetics Beyond 1999. Parthenon Publishing; 1999. |