Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Corrective Surgery Versus Dental Implant Treatment for Management of Compromised Permanent Maxillary Molars (An In-Vivo Study)
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Corrective Surgery Versus Dental Implant Treatment for Management of Compromised Permanent Maxillary Molars (An In-Vivo Study)
This study seeks to assess the clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes of root amputation versus implant over a 12 months period, generating robust evidence to guide clinical decision-making and enhance patient care.
This trial aims to compare periodontal stability, functional outcomes, complications, and patient-reported satisfaction of root amputation versus extraction followed by implant-supported single-tooth restoration. Twenty- eight patients (14 per arm) aged 20-50 with Maxillary first or second molars exhibiting Grade II-III furcation, adequate adjacent bone, and good oral hygiene will be enrolled; exclusions include uncontrolled systemic disease, heavy smoking. Participants will be randomized 1:1 Group A will receive endodontic therapy as indicated, surgical root amputation, while Group B will undergo extraction, and implant placement per standard protocols, and implant crowns. The primary outcome is survival at 12 months; secondary outcomes , clinical attachment level, radiographic bone level, peri-implant/peri-root and prosthetic complications, masticatory function, with clinical and standardized radiographic assessments at 1,3, 6 and 12 months. Data will be statistically analyzed using appropriate tests with significance set at p ≤ 0.05.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: