Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Bahçeşehir University | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Traditional hospital gowns fail to protect patient privacy due to their design features, restrict freedom of movement and are incompatible with medical equipment. This situation negatively affects both patient satisfaction and the quality of care. The limited number of studies addressing this issue in the literature highlights the unique value of the topic. This project will be conducted with a randomized controlled design to develop a functional and ergonomic hospital gown suitable for clinical requirements for patients undergoing abdominal surgery and to evaluate its effectiveness. During the design process, priority will be given to privacy, ease of mobilization and integration with medical devices.
The study first plans to produce a prototype of a cotton fabric apron. Technical modeling will be conducted in collaboration with the Department of Textile and Fashion Design at Bahçeşehir University; the prototype will then be evaluated for clinical suitability. In the second phase, an experimental study will be conducted at Medicana Hospital in Ataşehir, Istanbul, to assess the apron's effectiveness. The sample size was determined using power analysis to include 86 patients in each of the control and intervention groups, for a total of 172 patients, and 14 healthcare professionals will participate in the study. Patient and healthcare professional identification forms, along with patient apron evaluation questionnaires, will be used as data collection tools.
The study consists of five main work packages: (1) obtaining the necessary permits and registering the research, (2) selecting materials and determining fabric properties, (3) technical modeling and design work, (4) patient trials, and (5) data analysis. Interdisciplinary collaboration will be maintained throughout the process, and the final model will be developed through iterative prototyping and pilot trials.
The widespread impact of the project is expected to increase the quality of clinical care by enhancing the comfort and safety of surgical patients, facilitating the workflow of healthcare professionals and promoting sustainable textile usage. In addition, the commercialization of the developed product has the potential to make an economic contribution to the domestic textile sector.
The use of a hospital gown begins with the patient's admission to the hospital and continues until discharge. The traditional hospital gowns used today were designed in the early 1900s. These gowns feature a design that ties at the back and has no opening at the front. Although there have been many innovations and changes in patient care over the years, patient gowns have remained one of the few elements that have remained unchanged in the treatment and care process. Since patient gowns are provided by the hospital, it is common for them not to be tailored to the patient and to fail to meet individual needs.
The negative effects of current hospital gowns are addressed in the literature from various perspectives. The first of these is a loss of control and emotional distress. It has been reported that wearing a hospital gown creates a distinct sense of loss of control in patients, increases stress levels, and reinforces feelings of exclusion.
Another significant area of concern is violations of privacy and dignity. Because the design of the traditional hospital gown does not adequately protect privacy, it leads to feelings of shame and a sense of being exposed and vulnerable among patients.
Physical discomfort and restricted mobility are also among the frequently criticized aspects of current gowns. The literature indicates that the lacing systems of gowns are difficult to use, do not fit the body properly, and restrict patients' movements. Additionally, the need for assistance when putting on or taking off a gown makes patients dependent on family members or healthcare professionals. It is noted that these functional limitations lead to more serious problems, particularly in elderly, obese, or mobility-impaired individuals.
All these factors lead to dissatisfaction among both patients and healthcare workers. Studies indicate that current patient gowns are not only impractical but also undermine patient identity and self-confidence, which negatively impacts the care process. For example, following surgical treatment, patients are advised to spend at least two hours out of bed on the day of surgery and six hours on subsequent days. However, the open back of the traditional patient gown prevents patients from safely leaving their room and walking around.
In light of these findings, the need for innovative and patient-centered design in healthcare has become inevitable. The literature emphasizes that alternative scrubs models to be developed must not only enhance patients' psychological and physical comfort but also meet healthcare professionals' needs for functionality and ease of use.
In this context, the development of new patient gown designs that protect privacy, fit the body well, and facilitate functional, patient-centered care is among the top priorities of modern healthcare. The aim of this study is to develop a new gown tailored to the needs of patients undergoing abdominal surgery and to evaluate the effectiveness of the developed patient gown. This study is unique due to the limited number of studies on this topic in the literature.
In this context, the following hypotheses have been constructed. H1: The developed patient gown increases the patient's physical comfort. H2: The developed patient gown increases the patient's independence. H3: The developed patient gown ensures the patient's privacy. H4: The developed patient gown facilitates easy access to medical equipment on the patient's body.
H5: The developed patient gown ensures the patient's safety. H6: The developed patient gown reduces the workload of healthcare professionals.
H7: The developed patient gown facilitates treatment and care processes for healthcare professionals.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control Group | No Intervention | Patients in the control group will be dressed in a traditional hospital gown. | |
| Experimental Group | Experimental | Patients in this group will use the redesigned 100% cotton patient gown developed for abdominal surgery patients. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enhanced patient gown | Device | As part of the study, patients wearing the enhanced surgical gown will continue to wear the designated gown for at least 24 hours after achieving postoperative clinical stability (i.e., hemodynamically stable, awake, and able to move). The assessment will be conducted on the first postoperative day, within 24-48 hours after surgery. Following the completion of the enrollment period, data collection instruments will be administered to the patients. The opinions of healthcare professionals involved in the care and treatment of the enrolled patients (surgeons and surgical nurses) regarding the patient gown will be collected using the Patient Gown Evaluation Questionnaire for Healthcare Professionals. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The ease of putting on and taking off the patient gown | Patients' ability to wear and remove the patient gown independently will be evaluated using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 indicates "not satisfied at all" and 10 indicates "very satisfied." | Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery) |
| Comfort During Mobilization With the Patient Gown | Patients' comfort while performing movements such as getting out of bed and walking while wearing the patient gown will be assessed using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS). | Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery) |
| Perceived Privacy Protection Provided by the Patient Gown | Patients' perception regarding the adequacy of privacy protection provided by the patient gown will be evaluated using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "not satisfied at all" and 10 indicates "very satisfied." Higher scores indicate better perceived privacy protection. | Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery) |
| Ease of Access to Medical Devices and Dressing Areas | The extent to which the patient gown facilitates access to drains, catheters, and dressing areas during clinical care will be assessed using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "not satisfied at all" and 10 indicates "very satisfied." Higher scores indicate better accessibility during clinical care. | Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery) |
| Overall Comfort While Wearing the Patient Gown | Patients' overall comfort while wearing the patient gown will be evaluated using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "not comfortable at all" and 10 indicates "extremely comfortable." Higher scores indicate greater patient comfort. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Perceived Body Fit of the Patient Gown | Patients' perception regarding the compatibility of the patient gown with their body structure, including height, weight, and body shape, will be assessed using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "not compatible at all" and 10 indicates "completely compatible." Higher scores indicate better compatibility of the patient gown with the patient's body structure. |
Not provided
Patient Inclusion Criteria for the Study:
Patient Inclusion Criteria for the Study:
Inclusion Criteria for Healthcare Professionals in the Study:
Exclusion Criteria for Healthcare Professionals in the Study:
• Being on leave or on sick leave during the study period.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melis M CETINKAYA | Contact | +905354159839 | melis.cetinkaya@fbu.edu.tr |
Not provided
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background | Wang, L., Luu, S., Li, R., Song, G. 2022. "Thermal Comfort Evaluation of Medical Gowns Using Sweating Thermal Manikin", International Textile and Apparel Association Annual Conference Proceedings, 78(1). https://doi.org/10.31274/itaa.13497 | ||
| 37148935 | Background | Xu Q, Wang X, Zhang Y. Green and sustainable fabrication of a durable superhydrophobic cotton fabric with self-cleaning properties. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023 Jul 1;242(Pt 1):124731. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.124731. Epub 2023 May 5. | |
| Background | Zhao, Y., Zhou, F., Zhao, Y., Zou, Y., Wei, X. 2024. "Development of an Emotional Response Model for Hospital Gown Design Using Structural Equation Modeling", AUTEX Research Journal, 24(1), 20230010. https://doi.org/10.1515/aut-2023-0010 | ||
| Background | Oyediran, O. O., Animasahun, T. R., Fawole, I. O., Solanke, B. L., Suleiman, A. A. 2024. "Prevalence and Clinical Outcomes of Abdominal Surgeries in a South Western Nigerian University Teaching Hospital Between March 2017-October 2021", Tropical Journal of Health Sciences, 31(4), 31-37. https://doi.org/10.4314/tjhc.v31i4.5 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Latest randomized controlled trial with a control group
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery) |
| The sense of security felt when wearing a patient gown | Patients' sense of safety while using the patient gown will be assessed using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "not safe at all" and 10 indicates "completely safe." Higher scores indicate a greater sense of safety while using the patient gown. | Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery) |
| Perceived Workload During Patient Care While Using the Patient Gown | Healthcare professionals' perceptions regarding whether the patient gown increased workload during patient care procedures will be evaluated using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 indicates "not satisfied at all" and 10 indicates "very satisfied." | Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery) |
| Accessibility During Emergency Interventions While Using the Patient Gown | Healthcare professionals' perceptions regarding whether the patient gown interfered with emergency interventions and rapid access during urgent clinical situations will be evaluated using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 indicates "not satisfied at all" and 10 indicates "very satisfied." | Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery) |
| Suitability of the Patient Gown for Clinical Use | Healthcare professionals' perceptions regarding the suitability of the patient gown for routine clinical use in surgical patient care will be evaluated using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 indicates "not satisfied at all" and 10 indicates "very satisfied." | Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery) |
| Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery) |
| The skin compatibility of the patient gown | Patients' perception regarding skin irritation associated with the patient gown will be evaluated using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "severe skin irritation" and 10 indicates "no skin irritation." Higher scores indicate better skin compatibility and lower levels of skin irritation associated with the patient gown. | Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery) |
| Comfort of the Gown Fastening System | Patients' comfort related to the fastening and tying structure of the patient gown will be assessed using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "not comfortable at all" and 10 indicates "extremely comfortable." Higher scores indicate greater comfort related to the fastening and tying structure of the patient gown. | Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery) |
| Thermal Comfort Provided by the Patient Gown | Patients' perception of thermal comfort, including the absence of excessive sweating or feeling cold while using the patient gown, will be evaluated using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "not comfortable at all" and 10 indicates "extremely comfortable." Higher scores indicate greater thermal comfort while using the patient gown. | Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery) |
| Satisfaction With the Appearance of the Patient Gown | Patients' satisfaction with the appearance of the patient gown, including its color, model, and design features, will be assessed using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "not satisfied at all" and 10 indicates "very satisfied." Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with the appearance of the patient gown. | Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery) |
| Ease of Clinical Assessment While Using the Patient Gown | Healthcare professionals' perceptions regarding the ease of performing clinical assessments, such as vital sign monitoring and physical examination, while patients were wearing the patient gown will be evaluated using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 indicates "not satisfied at all" and 10 indicates "very satisfied." | Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery) |
| Background | Hwang, C., McCoy, L., Shaw, M. 2020. "Redesigning Maternity Hospital Gowns", Fashion Practice, 14, 79-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/17569370.2020.1794317 |
| Background | Gün, A. D., Bodur, A. 2014. "Kumaşların Su Buharı Geçirgenliği", Electronic Journal of Vehicle Technologies / Taşıt Teknolojileri Elektronik Dergisi, 8(3). |
| 37393442 | Background | Chen H, Dong P, Zhong P. The effect of a new design of patient gowns for prone position patients after vitrectomy: A non-randomized, concurrent, controlled study. Technol Health Care. 2024;32(1):55-62. doi: 10.3233/THC-220455. |
| 35045757 | Background | Tazreean R, Nelson G, Twomey R. Early mobilization in enhanced recovery after surgery pathways: current evidence and recent advancements. J Comp Eff Res. 2022 Feb;11(2):121-129. doi: 10.2217/cer-2021-0258. Epub 2022 Jan 20. |
| 36735235 | Background | Syed S, Stilwell P, Chevrier J, Adair C, Markle G, Rockwood K. Comprehensive design considerations for a new hospital gown: a patient-oriented qualitative study. CMAJ Open. 2022 Dec 20;10(4):E1079-E1087. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210271. Print 2022 Oct-Dec. |
| 32314508 | Background | Morton L, Cogan N, Kornfalt S, Porter Z, Georgiadis E. Baring all: The impact of the hospital gown on patient well-being. Br J Health Psychol. 2020 Sep;25(3):452-473. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12416. Epub 2020 Apr 20. |
| Background | Midha, V. K., Joshi, S., & Dakuri, A. (2022). Surgical gown fabrics in infection control and comfort measures at hospitals. Indian Journal of Fibre & Textile Research (IJFTR), 47(1), 96-104. |
| Background | Lucas, C., & Dellasega, C. (2020). Finding common threads: How patients, physicians and nurses perceive the patient gown. Patient Experience Journal. https://doi.org/10.35680/2372-0247.1387 |
| 34069861 | Background | Kam S, Yoo Y. Patient Clothing as a Healing Environment: A Qualitative Interview Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 18;18(10):5357. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105357. |
| 36310325 | Background | Joliat GR, Kobayashi K, Hasegawa K, Thomson JE, Padbury R, Scott M, Brustia R, Scatton O, Tran Cao HS, Vauthey JN, Dincler S, Clavien PA, Wigmore SJ, Demartines N, Melloul E. Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Liver Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations 2022. World J Surg. 2023 Jan;47(1):11-34. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06732-5. Epub 2022 Oct 30. |
| Background | Hwang, C., McCoy, L., & Shaw, M. (2020). Redesigning Maternity Hospital Gowns. Fashion Practice, 14, 79 - 98. https://doi.org/10.1080/17569370.2020.1794317 |
| 39351033 | Background | Gabay G, Ornoy H. Revisiting the hospital-issued gown in hospitalizations from a locus of control and patient-centered care perspectives: a call for design thinking. Front Public Health. 2024 Sep 16;12:1420919. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1420919. eCollection 2024. |
| 34368427 | Background | Frankel R, Peyser A, Farner K, Rabin JM. Healing by Leaps and Gowns: A Novel Patient Gowning System to the Rescue. J Patient Exp. 2021 Jul 21;8:23743735211033152. doi: 10.1177/23743735211033152. eCollection 2021. |
| Background | Eti Aslan, F. (2004). Ameliyat sonrası ağrı değerlendirmesinde görsel kıyaslama ölçeğiyle basit tanımlayıcı ölçeğin duyarlılık ve seçiciliği. Yoğun Bakım Hemşireliği Dergisi, 8(1), 1-6 |
| 33673875 | Background | Edgman-Levitan S, Schoenbaum SC. Patient-centered care: achieving higher quality by designing care through the patient's eyes. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2021 Mar 5;10(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13584-021-00459-9. |
| Background | Dinsdale, P. (2004). Revealing patient gowns overdue for a redesign. Nursing Standard, 18, 7. https://research.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id=8997fd97-f131-3fba-a70b-2e628d9f4841 |
| Background | Delialioğlu Ünsal, S.(2022). Erken mobilizasyon ve postoperatif rehabilitasyon. R. H. Gündoğdu & N. Alkış (Eds.). İçinde: Eras Kitabı-Kanıta Dayalı Cerrahi. BAYT, Ankara: 149-156 |
| Background | Cogan, N., Morton, L., Johnstone, J., Fleck, V., & Butler, S. (2023). When patients wear backless gowns, they take on the" sick role" and become dependent': exploring the perspectives of healthcare professionals. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9kv3g |
| Background | Cogan, N., Morton, L., & Georgiadis, E. (2019). Exploring the effect of the hospital gown on wellbeing: a mixed methods study. The Lancet, 394, S32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32829-6 |
| Background | Cogan, N. (2024). Exploring the Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals Concerning the Use and Utility of the Hospital Gown to Develop Theoretically Informed Behaviour Change Interventions. Public Health Open Access. https://doi.org/10.23880/phoa-16000265 |
| Background | Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates |
| 18302588 | Background | Cho HS, Paek JU, Davis G, Fedric T. Expanding the comfort of postmastectomy patients using the Papilla Gown. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2008;40(1):26-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00202.x. |
| Background | Black, S., & Torlei, K. (2013). Designing a New Type of Hospital Gown: A User-centered Design Approach Case Study. Fashion Practice, 5, 153-160. https://doi.org/10.2752/175693813X13559997789005 |
| Background | Arunachalam, P., & D'Souza, B. (2022). Patient-Centered Hospital Gowns: A Novel Redesign of Inpatient Attire to Improve Both the Patient and Provider Experience. 2022 Design of Medical Devices Conference. https://doi.org/10.1115/dmd2022-1058 |
| Background | Akter, H., & Goncu-Berk, G. (2024). A Study on Human-centered Design of Toddler Hospital Gowns. Bridging the Divide. https://doi.org/10.31274/itaa.17445 |