Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study was conducted to compare between the effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation and myofeedback on upper limb function, muscle activity and brain derived neurotropic factor in blood for children with hemiplegia after brain tumor surgery.
Studies indicate that neuromuscular electrical stimulation is more effective than voluntary exercise in enhancing serum Brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels and improving muscle strength and mobility in children with conditions like cerebral palsy and spinal muscular atrophy. Myofeedback, particularly surface electromyography biofeedback, is beneficial for upper extremity function post-stroke, as it helps raise awareness and control of movements. Intensive electromyography biofeedback has shown significant recovery in hemiplegic children compared to traditional therapy. There is potential for a multimodal treatment approach that combines neuromuscular electrical stimulation and biofeedback to mitigate the effects of brain tumors on upper limb function and optimize Brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| selected physical therapy program | Active Comparator | The control group will undergo a selected physical therapy (PT) program for one hour, three times weekly, over twelve weeks. |
|
| selected physical therapy program and biofeedback | Experimental | Patient will undergo a selected physical therapy program for one hour, three times a week, for twelve weeks, supplemented by a biofeedback program. |
|
| selected physical therapy program and neuromuscular electric stimulation | Experimental | The child will participate in a physical therapy program for one hour, three times a week, over twelve weeks, supplemented by neuromuscular electric stimulation. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| selected physical therapy program | Other | The program includes push-up exercises, active strength training for wrist extensors using fine motor toys, stretching for wrist and elbow flexors and pronators, weight-bearing positions from side sitting, quadruped position with active limb elevation, rolling a small ball with the affected limb, and rhythmic muscle approximation for shoulder, elbow, and wrist. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Assessment of muscle activity | All children will be assessed using surface electromyography for wrist extensor muscles while sitting, with their upper limbs resting on a desk and utilizing three electrodes. The ground electrode (black) is placed proximal to the others, the active electrode (yellow) is on the common extensor origin, and the connector (blue) is positioned at least 3 cm distally. After registering new patient data, the assessment begins via a one-channel surface electromyography setup, recording maximum and mean muscle activity during wrist extension upon pressing the play button. | at baseline and after 12 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Assessment of upper limb function | Using the short form of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test, which includes fourteen selected test items, subtests 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7 are administered. The child is positioned sitting at a table. The time taken for each task is noted as part of the proficiency evaluation. Performance is recorded, and raw scores are converted to point scores using a conversion table. The better result from two trials for each item is taken, and the total points from the fourteen short items are recorded in the designated area. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elmagd physical therapy centres, Teriaq oncology centre and Elite hospital. | Alexandria | Egypt |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| biofeedback | Device | During sessions, the child sits with an arm resting on a table, with electrodes placed on the wrist extensors and forearm. The treatment involves gradually increasing the intensity of faradic current to induce muscle contraction. Each session lasts 30 minutes to one hour, with treatments up to three times daily, using a frequency of 50-100 Hz and a pulse duration of 0.1-1 ms, for a duration of 2 weeks to 3 months. |
|
| neuromuscular electric stimulation | Device | The child will participate in a physical therapy program for one hour, three times a week, over twelve weeks, supplemented by neuromuscular electric stimulation. During sessions, the child sits with an arm resting on a table, with electrodes placed on the wrist extensors and forearm. The treatment involves gradually increasing the intensity of faradic current to induce muscle contraction. Each session lasts 30 minutes to one hour, with treatments up to three times daily, using a frequency of 50-100 Hz and a pulse duration of 0.1-1 ms, for a duration of 2 weeks to 3 months. |
|
| at baseline and after 12 weeks |
| assessment of level of neurotrophic factor | Fasting blood samples were taken in potassium-methylene diamine tetra acetic acid tubes, centrifuged for 15 minutes at 3000 rpm, and the plasma was stored at -80°C before being sent to Myriad RBM for a 190-analyte multiplex immunoassay. Additionally, the Brain-derived neurotrophic factor enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay reliably measures whole blood Brain-derived neurotrophic factor with high reproducibility. | at baseline and after 12 weeks |
| assessment of dynamic spasticity of wrist and elbow flexors muscles | Dynamic spasticity of wrist and elbow flexors muscles will be analyzed at the study's start and end. Measurements will include resistance 1 (fast velocity movement through full range of motion to identify the point of catch), resistance 2 (passive range of motion), and the difference resistance 2-resistance 1 (dynamic spasticity component). The Modified Ashworth Scale serves as a clinical tool for assessing spasticity, employing quantitative measurements at two speeds: slow (resistance 2) and fast (resistance 1). | at baseline and after 12 weeks |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006429 | Hemiplegia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010243 | Paralysis |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001676 | Biofeedback, Psychology |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D026441 | Mind-Body Therapies |
| D000529 | Complementary Therapies |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D001521 | Behavior Therapy |
| D011613 | Psychotherapy |
| D004191 | Behavioral Disciplines and Activities |
| D030141 | Feedback, Psychological |
Not provided
Not provided