Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| City of Helsinki | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This randomized and controlled study investigates the effectiveness of relationship counselling and couple therapy in improving couples' relationship satisfaction and overall well-being. It compares four intervention groups both with each other and with a waitlist control group. The groups are:
The study is conducted at the Relationship Counselling Unit of the City of Helsinki's Social Services in Finland, which provides counselling and family guidance under Section 26 of the Social Welfare Act to couples with children living in Helsinki. A total of 200 couples from the unit's treatment queue will be invited to participate and randomly assigned to one of the interventions or the control group, with 40 couples in each group.
Participants will complete questionnaires at the beginning and end of the service, and at a 4-month follow-up. The questionnaires measure relationship satisfaction and well-being, among other things. The study also examines how individual, couple-level, and treatment-related background factors influence and mediate the effectiveness of the interventions.
In addition to the questionnaires, registry data, therapist assessments, and ongoing treatment feedback collected within the unit is utilized. The results will provide new scientific insights into the effectiveness of short interventions and their suitable target groups and can be used to develop relationship counselling work both within the unit and nationally.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| HUS Self-help for Couples | Experimental |
| |
| Peloton Parisuhde (eng Fearless Relationship) Online Course | Experimental |
| |
| Manualized Short-Term EFT-Based Couple Intervention | Experimental |
| |
| Standard Face-to-Face Couple Therapy (Treatment as Usual) | Experimental |
| |
| Waitlist (control group) | No Intervention | Participants in this group do not receive any intervention during the initial two-month study period. After the waiting period, they are offered Treatment as Usual. This group serves as a comparison to assess the effectiveness of the active treatments. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-Help Program for Couples | Behavioral | Self-Help Program for Couples (Mielenterveystalo.fi) developed by HUS, this online self-help program provides couples with psychoeducational content and practical exercises designed to enhance relationship well-being. Partners can complete the tasks together or individually. The materials aim to strengthen emotional connection and improve communication. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Relationship Satisfaction (Dyadic Adjustment Scale) | The Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS) is a self-report questionnaire assessing relationship satisfaction and adjustment between romantic partners. The scale measures consensus, satisfaction, cohesion, and affectional expression. Total scores range from 0 to 151, with higher scores indicating better relationship adjustment and satisfaction. | Measured at enrollment before randomization, after treatment (or waitlist condition) and at a 4 months followup. |
| Depression severity (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) | The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a validated self-report measure assessing the severity of depressive symptoms over the past two weeks. Total scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms. | Measured at enrollment before randomization, after treatment (or waitlist condition) and at a 4 months followup. |
| Anxiety Severity (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7) | The Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) is a validated self-report measure assessing the severity of generalized anxiety symptoms over the past two weeks. Total scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety symptoms. | Measured at enrollment before randomization, after treatment (or waitlist condition) and at a 4 months followup. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Adult Attachment (Experiences in Close Relationships - Revised | The Experiences in Close Relationships - Revised (ECR-R) is a widely used self-report questionnaire that assesses adult attachment styles in romantic relationships. The instrument measures two dimensions: attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance, reflecting how individuals experience closeness, trust, and emotional connection with their partner. Scores on each subscale typically range from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating greater attachment anxiety or greater attachment avoidance. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Relationship Counselling | Helsinki | Finland |
Individual participant data cannot be shared due to strict confidentiality and data protection regulations. These data contain sensitive health-related information and personal identifiers, and sharing them could compromise participants' privacy. All data are handled in accordance with ethical guidelines and legal standards to ensure the protection of participants' rights and well-being.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
4 intervention groups and 1 waitlist control group. Waitlist control group gets TAU after waitlist time is finished.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Peloton Parisuhde (eng Fearless Relationship) Online Course | Behavioral | Based on Emotionally Focused Couple Therapy, this course by Eira Eklund-Mikola and Hanna Pinomaa uses online lectures and exercises to help couples identify negative interaction patterns and strengthen their emotional connection. |
|
| Manualized Short-Term EFT-Based Couple Intervention | Behavioral | Manualized Short-Term EFT-Based Couple Intervention is a structured program consisting of five face-to-face sessions with a trained couple therapist. Based on Emotionally Focused Therapy (EFT), the intervention helps partners explore emotional patterns, improve communication, and strengthen their bond through guided therapeutic exercises. |
|
| Standard Face-to-Face Couple Therapy (Treatment as Usual) | Behavioral | This intervention consists of 1 to 10 in-person sessions with a couple therapist. The therapeutic approach varies depending on the therapist's professional background and training. It reflects typical clinical practice and is not standardized, allowing for flexibility in addressing the couple's specific needs. |
|
| Measured at enrollment before randomization, after treatment (or waitlist condition) and at a 4 months followup. |
| Reflective Functioning (Reflective Functioning Questionnaire) | The Reflective Functioning Questionnaire - RFQ-8 is a brief self-report measure developed by Fonagy and colleagues to assess reflective functioning, or mentalizing-the ability to understand one's own and others' thoughts, feelings, and intentions. In couple research, it helps evaluate how well partners can interpret each other's behavior in emotionally meaningful ways, which is essential for healthy communication and emotional connection. | Measured at enrollment before randomization, after treatment (or waitlist condition) and at a 4 months followup. |
| Communication Patterns (Communication Patterns Questionnaire) | Communication Patterns Questionnaire - Short Form (CPQ-SF) Developed by Christensen and Sullaway, the CPQ-SF is a self-report measure that assesses how couples communicate during conflict. It focuses on typical interaction styles-such as constructive communication, avoidance, and demand-withdraw patterns-providing insight into how partners argue and resolve disagreements in their relationship. | Masured at enrollment before randomization, after treatment (or waitlist condition) and at a 4 months followup |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005191 | Family Characteristics |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003710 | Demography |
| D011154 | Population Characteristics |
| D012959 | Socioeconomic Factors |
| D015991 | Epidemiologic Measurements |
| D011634 | Public Health |
| D004778 | Environment and Public Health |
Not provided
Not provided