Modified LIFT Via a Lateral Approach Versus Standard LIFT for Transsphincteric Anal Fistula: A Prospective Randomized Study
Modified LIFT Via a Lateral Approach Versus Standard LIFT for Transsphincteric Anal Fistula: A Prospective Randomized Study
This study evaluated two sphincter-preserving surgical techniques for transsphincteric anal fistula: standard ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) and modified LIFT via a lateral approach. Adult patients with MRI-confirmed transsphincteric anal fistula were randomly assigned to one of the two procedures. The main outcome was wound healing time. Other outcomes included early recurrence or persistence of the fistula, postoperative pain, and fecal continence during 12 weeks of follow-up.
This was a prospective, single-center, randomized, parallel-group comparative surgical study conducted at the Department of General Surgery, Kayseri City Training and Research Hospital, Türkiye. The study included adult patients aged 18 to 75 years with magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed transsphincteric anal fistula who met the eligibility criteria and provided written informed consent.
Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either standard ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) or modified LIFT via a lateral approach. All patients were evaluated by the same surgical team, and postoperative follow-up was performed at weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12.
The study compared early clinical outcomes between the two procedures, including wound healing time, early recurrence or persistence, postoperative pain, and fecal continence. The study was approved by the Kayseri City Hospital Clinical Research Ethics Committee before patient enrollment.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: