Influence of the Lung Recruitment Potential on the Response to Two Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) Titration Strategies in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
Influence of the Lung Recruitment Potential on the Response to Two Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) Titration Strategies in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by severe hypoxemia and diffuse alveolar collapse, often requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. Non-individualized mechanical ventilation settings can cause ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) prevents alveolar collapse, but its effect varies among individuals. The recruitment-to-inflation (R/I) ratio evaluates bedside lung recruitment potential. This pilot study aims to compare two individualized PEEP titration strategies-one guided by the best static respiratory compliance and another guided by transpulmonary pressure via an esophageal balloon-and evaluate how baseline lung recruitment potential alters the early physiological responses to these interventions. Both strategies are preceded by an identical, standardized pressure-controlled initial lung recruitment maneuver to establish a baseline recruitment state.
This is a prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group pilot study conducted at the Adult Intensive Care Unit of Hospital Dr. Franco Ravera Zunino (HFRZ). Eligible adult patients under invasive mechanical ventilation with moderate-to-severe ARDS within 36 hours of fulfilling Berlin criteria will be evaluated.
Prior to randomization, the patient's recruitment potential will be measured bedside using the R/I ratio (where > 0.5 indicates high recruitment potential and <= 0.5 indicates low potential). Eligible participants will then be randomized 1:1 into two PEEP titration groups:
Crucially, immediately before starting the specific PEEP titration protocol in either group, an identical, standardized lung recruitment maneuver will be performed. This maneuver is executed in pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) with a control pressure of 15 cmH2O, I:E ratio of 1:1, FiO2 1.0, starting with PEEP 5 cmH2O and increasing by 5 cmH2O every 10 seconds up to PEEP 25 cmH2O, maintaining a maximum peak pressure limit of 40 cmH2O for exactly 1 minute.
Standard baseline ventilator parameters will follow protective ventilation targets: volume-controlled ventilation, tidal volume 6-8 mL/kg of predicted body weight, respiratory rate adjusted to keep pH 7.25-7.45, plateau pressure < 28 cmH2O, and driving pressure < 14 cmH2O. Physiological parameters (PaO2/FiO2, driving pressure, ventilatory ratio, static compliance) will be recorded at 1, 24, 48, and 72 hours. The primary outcome is the change in oxygenation (PaO2/FiO2 ratio) at 24 hours. The study will explore how the baseline phenotype of lung recruitability alters early mechanical and gas exchange outcomes.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
esteban.santis@ogb.cl940367716 ext. +56
carolina.lindsay.brain@gmail.com729383 ext. +56