Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Jordan University of Science and Technology | OTHER |
| Deanship of Scientific Research/Jordan University of Science and Technology | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this split-mouth pilot study is to study the effect of two different suturing techniques in root coverage using coronally advanced flap tunnel in multiple adjacent recession cases to see which technique will give superior outcomes in term of mean root coverage percentage, and root coverage esthetic score after 3-months.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Researcher will compare between V-reverse suturing technique and anchored sling suture to see which will result in superior mean root coverage percentage, and root coverage esthetic score after 3-months.
Participants will:
This split-moth pilot study is designed to assess the comparative effectiveness of V-reverse suturing technique(test) and anchored sling suturing technique (Control) in patients with bilateral multiple adjacent gingival recession. The primary aim of the study is to compare the test and control groups in terms of the obtained mean root coverage (mRC) and Root coverage esthetic score (RES) in 3 months. The secondary aims are to compare the two groups in terms of Complete root coverage (CRC), Keratinized tissue width (KTW), Gingival thickness (GT), Recession depth (REC), Probing depth (PD), and Patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction.
At surgery day (T0) baseline measurements and photographs will be taken for all participants and they will be treated with coronally advanced tunnel with autogenous connective tissue graft harvested from the palate for both sides. Each side will be randomly allocated for either V-reverse suturing technique (test) or anchored sling suturing technique (control) to advance the tunnel coronally. At the end of the surgery postoperative instructions will be delivered to all patients in a written and oral manner, in conjunction with a medical prescription, and post-operative questionnaire to fill for the next 14 days to capture patient-reported experience measures (PREMs).
Participants will be re-evaluated at 1 week and at 2 weeks sutures will be removed.
At (T1) 1 month after surgery the following parameters will be recorded : bleeding on probing (BOP), plaque index (PI), and recession depth.
At (T2) 3 month after surgery the following parameters will be recorded : bleeding on probing (BOP), plaque index (PI), recession depth, probing depth (PD), clinical attachment loss (CAL), gingival thickness (GT), keratinized tissue width (KTW), Root coverage esthetic score (RES), mean root coverage% (mRC%), and complete root coverage(cRC "YES/NO")..
Visual analog scale from 0 - 10 (10- very dissatisfied, 0- very satisfied) at each visit after surgery was taken to assess patients overall satisfaction, and another visual analog scale from 0 - 10 (10- worst pain, 0- no pain) to assess patients perceptions of pain.
Photographs will be taken at each visit, all indices will be recorded by a calibrated examiner, and oral hygiene instructions will be reinforced at each visit.
The trial will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (2013) and Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines. Approval has been granted by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Jordan University of Science and Technology. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to enrollment. Adverse events will be documented, monitored, and reported according to IRB requirements.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Test: V-Reverse Suture | Experimental | Coronally advanced tunnel with V-reverse suture. |
|
| Control: Anchored Sling Suture | Active Comparator | Coronally advanced tunnel with anchored sling suture |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| coronally advanced tunnel with v-reverse suture | Procedure | The V-reverse suturing technique can be a valid technique for improving graft and flap stability in the midfacial region which is likely the most crucial area that should be firm for achieving complete root coverage following the tunnel approach. The V-reverse suture starts in the palatal aspect, passing below the splinted contact point. Then the needle engages the graft and the flap (from inside to outside) ≈3 mm apical to the soft tissue margin in the mid-facial area. Then the needle passes to the palatal side under the contact point. Then the needle turns one round around the splinted composite (without pinching the soft tissue), and then the knot is performed and tightened over the composite. At the end, the sutures form a V-reverse shape |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| mean root coverage percentage | It represents the average percentage of the initial recession depth that has been successfully covered by new gum tissue over a defined period. | 3 months |
| root coverage esthetic score | (RES) is a, 10-point, five-variable system developed by Cairo et al. (2009) to objectively evaluate the success of gingival recession treatment. It evaluates root coverage (60% weight, 0-6 points) and four soft tissue parameters: margin contour, tissue texture, junction alignment, and color (40% weight, 1 point each). | 3 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of complete root coverage | a periodontal surgical outcome where the gingival margin is repositioned to the level of, or coronal to, the cementoenamel junction (CEJ), completely covering previously exposed root surfaces | 3 months |
| change in keratinized tissue width |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Reem Abdel-Hafez | Jordan University of Science and Technology | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan University of Science and Technology | Irbid | Jordan | 22110 | Jordan |
We plan to share de-identified individual participant data (IPD) including demographics, primary and secondary outcome measures, and adverse events. Data will be made available beginning 12 months after publication of the primary results, and will be accessible to qualified researchers upon reasonable request, subject to data-sharing agreements and IRB approval.
12 months after publication of primary results and will remain available for 5 years via a controlled access repository upon request and data use agreement.
Qualified researchers affiliated with academic institutions, healthcare organizations, or nonprofit research centers will be able to request access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) and supporting documents, including the Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), and Analytic Code.
Requests for access will be reviewed by the study sponsor or data access committee to ensure appropriate use and ethical standards.
Approved users will receive access via a secure online data repository, after signing a data use agreement that outlines terms of use, privacy protections, and publication rights.
Not provided
Not provided
This study is conduct in a split mouth fashion, meaning each patient arch is divided into quadrants, each quadrant is then randomized to either the test or the control group. Therefore, the study is considered a parallel-group (within-subject) design in terms of participant recruitment, because each subject receives two experimental interventions. However, from an intervention and randomization perspective, it is a comparative trial where the mouth is divided into quadrants (e.g., left and right) that are randomly assigned to different suturing techniques.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| coronally advanced tunnel with anchored sling suture | Procedure | In addition to interrupted sutures, sling sutures have also regularly been applied as a conventional method of suturing to advance periodontal flaps over exposed root surfaces and connect the papillae to the interdental connective tissues, and composite stops where added to provide better stability. |
|
Measured as the distance from gingival margin to mucogingival junction (MGJ) using a periodontal probe (UNC15). |
| at baseline and 3 months |
| change in gingival thickness | Probe visibility technique was used, by inserting a periodontal probe (UNC15) in mid-facial aspect of the tooth, and thin gingival biotype is defined as ≤ 1mm (visible probe), while thick is > 1mm (invisible probe). | at baseline and at 3 months |
| change in recession depth | Measured as the distance between the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and gingival margin using a periodontal probe (UNC15). | at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months |
| Patient reported experience measures (PREMs) | were assessed using validated translations of the OHIP-14 questionnaire into the native language of all participants. Patients were instructed to use a postoperative diary for the first 14 days after the surgery to capture patient-reported experience measures (PREMs). The diary was designed to assess patient recovery in four main areas: post-surgery sequelae, pain and discomfort, oral function, interference with daily activities. | For 14 days after surgery |
| change in probing depth | Measured as the distance from the gingival margin to the base of the pocket using a periodontal probe (UNC15). | at baseline and 3 months |
| Patient satisfaction score | Visual analog scale from 0 - 10 (10- very dissatisfied, 0- very satisfied) at each visit after surgery was taken to assess patients overall satisfaction. | day one, 1week, 2weeks, 1 month, 3months after surgery |
| Patient perception of pain score | Visual analog scale from 0 - 10 (10- worst pain, 0- no pain) to assess patients perceptions of pain. | day one, 1 week, 2 weeks following surgery |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005889 | Gingival Recession |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005882 | Gingival Diseases |
| D010510 | Periodontal Diseases |
| D009059 | Mouth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
| D055093 | Periodontal Atrophy |
Not provided
Not provided