Evaluation of the Effect of Driving Pressure-Guided Individualized PEEP Titration Versus Standard PEEP on Early and Late Postoperative Atelectasis Development Using Lung Ultrasonography in Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgeries
Evaluation of the Effect of Driving Pressure-Guided Individualized PEEP Titration Versus Standard PEEP on Early and Late Postoperative Atelectasis Development Using Lung Ultrasonography in Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgeries
The purpose of this study is to compare two different airway pressure (PEEP) strategies during gynecological laparoscopic surgery to see which one better prevents lung collapse (atelectasis). We will compare a 'standard' fixed pressure with a 'personalized' pressure adjusted according to the patient's own lung mechanics (driving pressure). We will use lung ultrasound to check the lungs before surgery, 1 hour after surgery, and 24 hours after surgery to evaluate the results.
In this prospective observational study, we investigate the impact of PEEP strategies on lung collapse (atelectasis) in patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopy. The Standard Group receives a routine clinical application of 5 cmH2O PEEP. The Individualized Group undergoes a PEEP titration protocol where PEEP starts at 20 cmH2O and is adjusted to reach the optimal level based on the lowest driving pressure. To measure the results, a 12-zone Lung Ultrasonography (LUS) scoring system (0-3 points per zone) is utilized. Evaluations are conducted preoperatively (baseline), 1 hour postoperatively (early phase), and 24 hours postoperatively (late phase) to track the development and resolution of atelectasis.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: