Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aimed to compare the effects of music-accompanied exercise snacks and calisthenic exercises on pain, locomotor performance, quality of life, and physical activity-related outcomes in healthy older adults.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calisthenic | Active Comparator |
| |
| Snack | Experimental |
| |
| Control | No Intervention |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calisthenic Exercise | Other | Participants in the CEG performed music-accompanied bodyweight exercises, with each session lasting approximately 20 minutes. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) | The test measures the time required to stand up from a chair, walk 3 meters at a safe and comfortable speed, turn around, walk back, and sit down again. Shorter completion times indicate better balance and mobility performance. | Preintervention, postintervention 6th week |
| 30-Second Sit-to-Stand Test | The 30-Second Sit-to-Stand Test was used to assess lower extremity strength and endurance as indicators of functional performance in older adults. The number of complete sit-to-stand repetitions performed within 30 seconds was recorded as the test score | Preintervention, postintervention 6th week |
| Stair Climb Test | Participants were instructed to ascend and descend a staircase consisting of nine steps (16-20 cm in height) as quickly and safely as possible. Total completion time was recorded as the outcome measure. | Preintervention, postintervention 6th week |
| Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES) | The Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES) is an 8-item unidimensional instrument assessing positive feelings such as enjoyment and pleasure associated with physical activity. Responses are rated on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("strongly disagree") to 7 ("strongly agree"). Higher mean scores indicate greater enjoyment of physical activity. | Preintervention, postintervention 6th week |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pain Assessment | Pain perceived during rest, walking, and stair ascent/descent was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The distance (mm) between the "no pain" anchor and the participant's mark on a 10-cm line was measured, yielding a score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity. | Preintervention, postintervention 6th week |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sinem Yenil Kocabay | Denizli | Denizli | 20060 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Snack exercise | Other | Participants in the ESG performed music-accompanied exercise sessions under physiotherapist supervision twice weekly for 6 weeks. |
|
| Pain Disability Index (PDI) | The PDI consists of seven items evaluating the impact of pain on daily functional activities. Participants rate each item on a scale from 0 to 10. Total scores range from 0 to 70, with scores ≥40 indicating high disability. Higher scores reflect greater disability severity. | Preintervention, postintervention 6th week |
| Modified Falls Efficacy Scale (MFES) | The MFES is based on a visual analog scale assessing confidence in performing daily activities without falling. Participants rate their confidence for each activity on a scale ranging from 0 (no confidence) to 10 (complete confidence). The total score is divided by 14 to obtain the final score. Higher scores indicate lower fall risk, whereas lower scores indicate greater fall risk. | Preintervention, postintervention 6th week |
| Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile for Older Adults (HPLP-OA) | The HPLP-OA was developed to evaluate health-promoting behaviors in adults aged 65 years and older. The scale consists of 22 items scored on a 4-point Likert scale. Total scores range from 22 to 88, with higher scores indicating greater frequency of health-promoting behaviors. | Preintervention, postintervention 6th week |
| International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) | The IPAQ assesses time spent in physical activities during the previous week, including sitting, walking, moderate-intensity activity, and vigorous-intensity activity. Scores are calculated as MET-minutes/week by multiplying duration, frequency, and metabolic equivalent (MET) values. | Preintervention, postintervention 6th week |
| World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale-Older Adults Module (WHOQOL-OLD TR) | The WHOQOL-OLD module consists of 24 items across six domains, rated using a 5-point Likert scale. Subscale scores range from 4 to 20, and a total score can also be calculated by summing domain scores. Higher scores indicate better quality of life. | Preintervention, postintervention 6th week |