Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-066 | Other Identifier | Turkish Medicines and Medical Devices Agency Clinical Trial Authorization Number | |
| 25/31 | Other Identifier | Baskent University Institutional Ethics Committee Approval Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether two types of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) appliances produce different outcomes in children. RME is a treatment utilized to expand a narrow upper jaw. This study will include children aged 8 to 10 years who need upper jaw expansion during the mixed dentition period (when they have both temporary and permanent teeth).
The main questions this study aims to answer are:
Researchers aimed to compare a conventionally fabricated expansion appliance manufactured in a dental laboratory with a 3D-printed expansion appliance produced digitally to determine whether the method of production affects treatment outcomes and patient comfort.
Participants:
Treatment effectiveness, amount of expansion, and patient comfort will be evaluated between the two groups. Additionally, the impact of digital appliance production on treatment outcomes and patient satisfaction will be investigated.
This prospective, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial aims to compare the skeletal, dentoalveolar, and patient-reported effects of conventionally fabricated and three-dimensional (3D) printed rapid maxillary expansion (RME) appliances in children with transverse maxillary deficiency during the mixed dentition period.
Participants aged 8-10 years who meet the predefined inclusion criteria and require rapid maxillary expansion as part of their orthodontic treatment will be enrolled.
The results are expected to contribute evidence-based guidance for orthodontists when selecting appliance fabrication methods, balancing biological effectiveness with patient comfort and quality-of-life considerations.
Findings from this study may also support future digital workflow integration strategies in pediatric orthodontic treatment planning.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Laboratory-fabricated rapid maxillary expansion appliance | Experimental | Participants are treated with a laboratory-fabricated rapid maxillary expansion (RME) appliance produced on a dental cast obtained from conventional impressions. The arms of the palatal expansion screw are adapted and soldered to orthodontic molar bands on the cast model. Following adaptation, acrylic resin is added in the palatal region to increase the force distribution area. The appliance is cemented to the teeth using glass ionomer cement. Activation and retention protocols are standardized across both groups. |
|
| 3D-printed rapid maxillary expansion appliance | Experimental | Participants are treated with a rapid maxillary expansion (RME) appliance fabricated using digital intraoral scans. Dental models are generated from intraoral scan data, and the appliance framework, including the arms and tooth-supporting components, is manufactured as a single-piece structure using three-dimensional (3D) metal printing technology with sintered cobalt-chromium alloy. After fabrication, acrylic resin is added to the palatal region to increase the force distribution area. The appliance is cemented to the teeth using glass ionomer cement. Activation and retention protocols are standardized across both groups. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laboratory-fabricated rapid maxillary expansion appliance | Device | A rapid maxillary expansion (RME) appliance fabricated on a dental cast obtained from conventional impressions. The expansion screw arms are adapted and soldered to orthodontic molar bands on the cast. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in maxillary transverse skeletal width and intermolar width from T0 to T2 | The primary outcome is the difference in transverse skeletal maxillary width and maxillary intermolar width between baseline (T0) and the end of the 3-month retention period (T2). Skeletal measurements will be obtained from standardized posteroanterior cephalometric radiographs, and dental measurements will be obtained from digital model analysis. | -Preoperative (T0) -After appliance cementation (within 2 weeks) -1 week after the cementation -End of active expansion (approximately 6-8 weeks after cementation) (T1) -End of the 3 months retention period after T1, prior to appliance removal (T2) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale score | Pain perception will be assessed using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale at predefined time points during treatment. Scores will be recorded and compared between groups. | -Preoperative (T0) -After appliance cementation (within 2 weeks) -1 week after the cementation -End of active expansion (approximately 6-8 weeks after cementation) (T1) -End of the 3 months retention period after T1, prior to appliance removal (T2) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| 3D digital model superimposition-based surface deviation | Digital models obtained at T0 and T2 will be superimposed using the medial two-thirds of the third palatal rugae and the posterior palatal vault as stable reference areas. | -Preoperative (T0) -After appliance cementation (within 2 weeks) -1 week after the cementation -End of active expansion (approximately 6-8 weeks after cementation) (T1) -End of the 3 months retention period after T1, prior to appliance removal (T2) |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Habibe Sinem Ince Bingol, DDS, Orthodontist | Hacettepe Unversity, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics | Study Chair |
| Sinem Tekdemir, DDS | Baskent University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baskent University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics | Ankara | 06490 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared due to institutional policies, ethical committee regulations, and patient confidentiality considerations.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a two-arm, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either a conventionally fabricated rapid maxillary expansion appliance or a three-dimensional (3D) printed metal rapid maxillary expansion appliance. Allocation will be performed using sealed opaque envelopes. All participants will follow the same standardized activation and retention protocol. Outcome assessments will be conducted between baseline (T0) and the end of the retention period (T2).
Not provided
Not provided
Due to the visible differences between the appliances, participants and treating clinicians cannot be blinded. However, all cephalometric and digital model measurements will be performed by an independent outcome assessor who is blinded to group allocation. Radiographic and digital files will be coded prior to analysis.
|
| 3D-printed rapid maxillary expansion appliance | Device | A rapid maxillary expansion (RME) appliance fabricated using digital intraoral scan data. Dental models are generated from intraoral scans, and the appliance framework is manufactured as a single-piece structure using three-dimensional (3D) metal printing with sintered cobalt-chromium alloy. |
|
|
| Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ 8-10) | Oral health-related quality of life will be assessed using the validated Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ 8-10). Total and domain scores (oral symptoms, functional limitations, emotional well-being, social well-being) will be recorded and compared between groups. | -Preoperative (T0) -After appliance cementation (within 2 weeks) -1 week after the cementation -End of active expansion (approximately 6-8 weeks after cementation) (T1) -End of the 3 months retention period after T1, prior to appliance removal (T2) |
| Modified Silness-Löe Plaque Index score | Oral hygiene status will be evaluated using the Modified Silness-Löe Plaque Index at predefined time points during treatment to monitor plaque accumulation and compare oral hygiene changes between groups. | -Preoperative (T0) -After appliance cementation (within 2 weeks) -1 week after the cementation -End of active expansion (approximately 6-8 weeks after cementation) (T1) -End of the 3 months retention period after T1, prior to appliance removal (T2) |