Comparative Effects of Perturbation-Based Balance Training on Firm Surface and Rolling Board for Diabetic Neuropathy Patients

Comparative Effects of Perturbation-Based Balance Training on Firm Surface and Rolling Board for Diabetic Neuropathy Patients

The present study is designed to compare the effectiveness of perturbation-based balance training performed on two different surfaces, stable (firm surface) and unstable (rolling board), for enhancing static, dynamic, and reactive balance in individuals diagnosed with diabetic neuropathy. This randomized clinical trial will recruit a total of 42 participants, with the sample size calculated using Epi Tool software. A consecutive sampling technique will be implemented. Eligible participants who fulfill the inclusion criteria will be randomly assigned into two equal groups (n = 21 each) through an online randomization method. Participants in Group A will undergo perturbation-based balance exercises on a stable surface, whereas participants in Group B will receive similar training on a rolling board to introduce surface instability. In addition to the primary intervention, both groups will receive contrast bath therapy as a standard baseline treatment. Written as well as verbal informed consent will be obtained prior to participation. The intervention protocol will span four weeks, consisting of three sessions per week on alternate days, resulting in a total of twelve treatment sessions. The primary outcomes will focus on balance performance and fall risk. These outcomes will be measured using the Berg Balance Scale, the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test, and the Timed Up and Go test. Screening for diabetic neuropathy will be carried out using the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument. Statistical analysis will be performed using SPSS version 23.

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy is one of the most prevalent complications associated with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. It commonly presents with symptoms such as burning sensations, tingling, numbness, discomfort, and diminished sensation in the lower extremities, which significantly affect balance and functional mobility. The present study is designed to compare the effectiveness of perturbation-based balance training performed on two different surfaces, stable (firm surface) and unstable (rolling board), for enhancing static, dynamic, and reactive balance in individuals diagnosed with diabetic neuropathy. This randomized clinical trial will recruit a total of 42 participants, with the sample size calculated using Epi Tool software. A consecutive sampling technique will be implemented. Eligible participants who fulfill the inclusion criteria will be randomly assigned into two equal groups (n = 21 each) through an online randomization method. Participants in Group A will undergo perturbation-based balance exercises on a stable surface, whereas participants in Group B will receive similar training on a rolling board to introduce surface instability. In addition to the primary intervention, both groups will receive contrast bath therapy as a standard baseline treatment. Written as well as verbal informed consent will be obtained prior to participation. The intervention protocol will span four weeks, consisting of three sessions per week on alternate days, resulting in a total of twelve treatment sessions. The primary outcomes will focus on balance performance and fall risk. These outcomes will be measured using the Berg Balance Scale, the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test, and the Timed Up and Go test. Screening for diabetic neuropathy will be carried out using the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument. Statistical analysis will be performed using SPSS version 23.

Inclusion Criteria:

• Individuals with a confirmed clinical diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes (HbA1c ≥ 6.5%) (Bolen et al., 2016).
• Participants with a diabetes duration of more than 10 years (Grewal et al., 2015).
• Participants exhibiting signs and symptoms of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (such as numbness, tingling, burning, shooting or electric shock-like pain, and glove-and-stocking distribution), confirmed using the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument with scores of 6-8 (patient version) and 2.5-4 (physical assessment) (Haque et al., 2022).
• Participants aged between 40 and 75 years (Rasool et al., 2024).
• Both male and female participants will be eligible for inclusion (Haleem et al., 2024).
• Participants currently using insulin-sensitizing medications (e.g., metformin, Diamicron, insulin).
• Participants who are able to stand and walk independently (Allin et al., 2020).
• Participants with a Berg Balance Scale score ranging from 25 to 40 (Phyu et al., 2022).
• Participants willing to provide informed consent (Lepesis et al., 2023).

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) will be excluded (Daud et al., 2021).
• Those with cognitive deficits (such as dementia or Alzheimer's disease) that may interfere with comprehension or compliance with study procedures will not be included (Hatton et al., 2019).
• Individuals presenting with foot drop or other neurological disorders (e.g., stroke, myelopathy, or cerebellar ataxia) that could affect the study findings will be excluded (Khurshid et al., 2025).
• Patients who have recently undergone surgery, sustained trauma to the feet or lower limbs, or have any foot amputation will not be eligible (Collings et al., 2023).
• Individuals diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis or orthostatic hypotension will be excluded (Khurshid et al., 2025).
• Patients with active diabetic foot ulcers or notable musculoskeletal deformities (such as scoliosis or degenerative joint disease) will be excluded (Lepesis et al., 2023).
• Individuals with neuropathy unrelated to diabetes, including cases associated with alcohol use or Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, will not be included.
• Participants taking medications that may provoke vertigo or disturb balance (for example, aspirin) will be excluded.