Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-523632-39-00 | EU Trial (CTIS) Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) predominantly affect older adults, and their incidence continues to rise with advanced age. For many patients, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains the only curative option capable of providing long-term disease control through the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect. Historically, however, allo-HSCT was rarely offered to patients older than 50 years because of the high morbidity and mortality associated with myeloablative conditioning regimens and limited supportive care strategies. Over the past two decades, advances in reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC), infection prophylaxis, and donor availability have profoundly transformed the landscape, allowing increasing numbers of older patients to access transplantation.
Multiple studies have demonstrated that allo-HSCT confers a survival benefit in older AML patients in complete remission compared with consolidation chemotherapy alone.
The intensity of conditioning profoundly influences both relapse risk and non-relapse mortality (NRM). myeloablative conditioning (NMAC) regimens are attractive for older adults due to their low toxicity but rely solely on the immunologic GVL effect and thus carry a higher relapse risk. Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens, incorporating intermediate-dose alkylating agents such as busulfan, melphalan, or thiotepa, offer stronger anti-leukemic effect but at the cost of greater toxicity.
These observations underscore the central question: can a conditioning regimen combine strong anti-leukemic potency with the low toxicity required for older patients undergoing Haplo-SCT? The main objective is to evaluate the efficacy of FT-RIC regimen before Haplo-SCT for older and/or frail patients diagnosed with AML, who are not eligible for a myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimen.
To achieve this objective, the investigators will assess Progression Free Survival (PFS) defined as the time from allo-HSCT to AML relapse or death.
This is a Multicenter trial, single arm prospective of phase II. Once the conditioning has been administered and the transplant performed, the patient will receive standard routine follow-up care, with the addition of questionnaires, and for patients followed at the Institut Paoli Calmettes only, blood samples will be collected.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| fludarabine and treosulfan | Experimental | After screening and inclusion, patients will be given a RIC regimen based on the market-approved association of fludarabine and treosulfan (FT-RIC):
|
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| fludarabine and treosulfan | Drug | As per standard practices, patients will be hospitalized during the treatment period. The treatment is administered by the nurses of the department under the responsibility of the investigator.Fludarabine (30 mg/m²/day from day-6 to day-2), iv andTreosulfan (10 g/m²/day from day-4 to day-2), iv |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The main objective is to evaluate the efficacy of FT-RIC regimen before Haplo-SCT for older and/or frail patients diagnosed with AML, who are not eligible for a MAC regimen. | Progression Free Survival (PFS) defined as the time from allo-HSCT to AML relapse or death | through study completion an average of 4 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To evaluate adverse events related to the FT combination according to CTCAE V6.0 | Conditioning related toxicity according to CTCAE V.6.0 | through study completion an average of 4 years |
| To evaluate engraftment after FT-RIC |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAKRADOUNI Jihane | Contact | 0491223824 | pakradounij@ipc.unicancer.fr | |
| ARTHUR Allison | Contact | 0491223448 | arthura@ipc.unicancer.fr |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
rate of graft failure
| through study completion an average of 4 years |
| To evaluated hematological recovery after FT-RIC | Cumulative incidence of neutrophil and platelet recovery | after hematological recovery |
| to evaluate incidence of both acute and chronic GVHD after FT-RIC | Cumulative incidence of acute GVHD and Cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD | through study completion an average of 4 years |
| To evaluate survival, non-relapse mortality and cause of death after FT-RIC | Probability of Overall Survival and Probability of GVHD | through study completion an average of 4 years |
| To evaluate the immunosuppressive therapy duration after FT-RIC | Prevalence of immunosuppressive therapy (IST) and GVHD at 3, 6, 9, 12 months | through study completion an average of 4 years |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015470 | Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007951 | Leukemia, Myeloid |
| D007938 | Leukemia |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D006402 | Hematologic Diseases |
| D006425 | Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C024352 | fludarabine |
| C018404 | treosulfan |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided