Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This clinical trial evaluated whether a 15% propolis solution could delay or prevent severe oral mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Oral mucositis is a common and painful side effect of radiotherapy to the head and neck region. It can interfere with eating, swallowing, hydration, pain control, and treatment tolerance.
Researchers compared propolis plus standard oral care with placebo plus standard oral care. The main question was whether propolis delayed the first occurrence of severe oral mucositis during radiotherapy. Severe oral mucositis was assessed using the World Health Organization Oral Toxicity Scale.
Participants were randomly assigned to receive either 15% propolis solution or placebo. Both solutions were used with the same schedule. Participants diluted 20 drops in 50 mL water and used the assigned solution with a swish-and-swallow method four times daily during radiotherapy. All participants also received standard oral care.
Participants had weekly clinical assessments during radiotherapy. Researchers recorded oral mucositis grade, swallowing difficulty, pain, need for oral nutritional supplements, clinical oral candidiasis, hospitalization for supportive care, and other treatment-related outcomes. Quality-of-life questionnaires were completed at planned study visits.
Radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis is a frequent and clinically important toxicity in patients receiving radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Severe oral mucositis can cause pain, swallowing difficulty, reduced oral intake, dehydration, need for nutritional support, hospitalization for supportive care, and interruptions in cancer treatment.
Propolis is a resinous bee-derived product containing phenolic compounds and flavonoids. It has been studied for potential anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antimicrobial, and wound-healing effects. Because these biological properties may be relevant to the pathogenesis of oral mucositis, propolis has been proposed as a candidate supportive care intervention for patients receiving cancer therapy.
This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluated a commercially available water-soluble 15% propolis solution in patients with head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Participants were randomized to receive either propolis or placebo in addition to standard oral care. The assigned solution was diluted in water and used with a swish-and-swallow method four times daily during radiotherapy.
The primary objective was to determine whether 15% propolis solution delayed the first occurrence of severe oral mucositis during radiotherapy. Oral mucositis was graded during scheduled weekly clinical assessments using the World Health Organization Oral Toxicity Scale. The trial also evaluated clinically relevant supportive care outcomes, including swallowing difficulty, pain, oral nutritional supplement use, clinical oral candidiasis, hospitalization for supportive care, and patient-reported quality of life.
The study was conducted as an investigator-initiated supportive care trial. The manufacturer supplied the propolis and placebo solutions free of charge but had no role in study design, participant recruitment, clinical assessments, data collection, data analysis, interpretation of findings, manuscript preparation, or the decision to submit the results for publication.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Propolis | Experimental | Participants received 15% propolis solution in addition to standard oral care during radiotherapy. The solution was diluted in water and used with a swish-and-swallow method four times daily. |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Participants received placebo solution in addition to standard oral care during radiotherapy. The solution was diluted in water and used with the same swish-and-swallow schedule as the propolis group. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15% Propolis solution | Dietary Supplement | A commercially available water-soluble 15% propolis solution. Participants diluted 20 drops in 50 mL water and used the solution with a swish-and-swallow method four times daily during radiotherapy. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time to First Severe Oral Mucositis | Time from the start of radiotherapy to the first occurrence of severe oral mucositis, defined as grade 3 or higher according to the World Health Organization Oral Toxicity Scale. The scale ranges from grade 0 to grade 4, with higher grades indicating more severe oral mucositis. | From start of radiotherapy to completion of radiotherapy, assessed weekly up to approximately 7 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time to First Moderate or Severe Oral Mucositis | Time from the start of radiotherapy to the first occurrence of moderate or severe oral mucositis, defined as grade 2 or higher according to the World Health Organization Oral Toxicity Scale. The scale ranges from grade 0 to grade 4, with higher grades indicating more severe oral mucositis. | From start of radiotherapy to completion of radiotherapy, assessed weekly up to approximately 7 weeks |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Samet Özlügedik, Prof. MD, PhD | Ankara Oncology Research and Training Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital | Ankara | Ankara | 06200 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
It is not yet decided whether individual participant data will be shared. De-identified individual participant data may be made available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request, subject to institutional approval, ethics requirements, and applicable data protection regulations.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006258 | Head and Neck Neoplasms |
| D013280 | Stomatitis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D009059 | Mouth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Participants were randomized to one of two parallel groups: 15% propolis solution plus standard oral care or placebo plus standard oral care. Both groups used the assigned solution with the same swish-and-swallow schedule during radiotherapy.
Not provided
Not provided
Participants, care providers, investigators, and outcomes assessors were masked to treatment allocation. Propolis and placebo solutions were supplied in identical amber dropper bottles and administered using the same schedule. The randomization sequence was managed by an independent administrative secretariat. Participants were instructed not to discuss sensory characteristics of the solutions with the assessment team.
| Placebo Solution | Other | A placebo solution supplied in identical amber dropper bottles and administered according to the same dilution and swish-and-swallow schedule as the propolis solution. |
|
| Standard oral care | Other | Standard oral care included tooth brushing with a soft toothbrush and fluoride toothpaste or denture cleaning, and bicarbonate-based mouthwash after meals. |
|
| Incidence of Dysphagia | Proportion of participants with dysphagia of grade 2 or higher during radiotherapy, graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. The CTCAE grading system ranges from grade 1 to grade 5, with higher grades indicating more severe adverse events. | From start of radiotherapy to completion of radiotherapy, assessed weekly up to approximately 7 weeks |
| Incidence of Pain | Proportion of participants with pain of grade 2 or higher during radiotherapy, graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. The CTCAE grading system ranges from grade 1 to grade 5, with higher grades indicating more severe adverse events. | From start of radiotherapy to completion of radiotherapy, assessed weekly up to approximately 7 weeks |
| Requirement for Oral Nutritional Supplements | Proportion of participants who initiated oral nutritional supplements during radiotherapy. | From start of radiotherapy to completion of radiotherapy, assessed weekly up to approximately 7 weeks |
| Time to Initiation of Oral Nutritional Supplements | Time from the start of radiotherapy to first documented use of oral nutritional supplements. | From start of radiotherapy to completion of radiotherapy, assessed weekly up to approximately 7 weeks |
| Hospitalization for Supportive Care | Proportion of participants hospitalized from the start of radiotherapy to two weeks after completion of radiotherapy for treatment-related toxicity requiring supportive care, including nutritional support, hydration, analgesic treatment, or general supportive management. | From start of radiotherapy to two weeks later than completion of radiotherapy, up to approximately 9 weeks |
| Clinical Oral Candidiasis | Proportion of participants diagnosed with clinical oral candidiasis during scheduled clinical assessments. | From start of radiotherapy to completion of radiotherapy, assessed weekly up to approximately 7 weeks |
| Change in Body Weight | Percentage change in body weight from baseline to week 4 of radiotherapy. | Baseline to week 4 of radiotherapy |
| Change in Serum Albumin | Change in serum albumin level from baseline to week 4 of radiotherapy, measured in g/L, when clinically available. | Baseline to week 4 of radiotherapy |
| Change in The EORTC Core Quality of Life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status Score | Change from baseline in the global health status score measured using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). Scores are linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. Higher scores indicate better global health status and quality of life. | Baseline, week 7, and week 12 |
| Change in EORTC QLQ-C30 Functional Scale Scores | Change from baseline in functional scale scores measured using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), including physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social functioning. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. Higher scores indicate better functioning. | Baseline, week 7, and week 12 |
| Change in EORTC QLQ-C30 Symptom Scale and Item Scores | Change from baseline in symptom scale and single-item scores measured using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). Scores are linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. Higher scores indicate greater symptom burden. | Baseline, week 7, and week 12 |
| Change in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 Symptom Scale Scores | Change from baseline in head and neck cancer-specific symptom scale scores measured using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Head and Neck Cancer Module 35 (EORTC QLQ-H&N35). Scores are linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. Higher scores indicate greater symptom burden. | Baseline, week 7, and week 12 |
| Change in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 Single-Item Symptom Scores | Change from baseline in head and neck cancer-specific single-item symptom scores measured using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Head and Neck Cancer Module 35 (EORTC QLQ-H&N35). Scores are linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. Higher scores indicate greater symptom burden or more problems. | Baseline, week 7, and week 12 |