Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chang Gung Memorial Hospital | Other Grant/Funding Number | Chang Gung Memorial Hospital |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) carries one of the worst prognoses among solid tumors. Even after curative-intent resection, 70-80% of patients recur within two years. Current post-operative surveillance relies on computed tomography (CT) imaging and the serum tumor marker CA 19-9, but both have limited sensitivity for detecting microscopic residual disease.
This single-center, prospective observational study evaluates the use of the K-4CARE Lite platform-a tumor-informed plus tumor-agnostic circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assay with a limit of detection of 0.005%-for dynamic monitoring of minimal residual disease (MRD) in patients with resected PDAC.
Thirty adult patients who have undergone R0 or R1 (margin <1 mm) resection at Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital will be enrolled over 24 months. Each participant will provide one baseline tumor tissue sample (formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded) and three serial blood samples at three pre-specified study timepoints: Timepoint 1 (Week 4 to Week 10 after surgery, before adjuvant chemotherapy); Timepoint 2 (12 weeks after Timepoint 1, approximately 3 months into adjuvant chemotherapy); and Timepoint 3 (at completion of adjuvant chemotherapy, approximately Month 6 after surgery). A fourth long-term follow-up phase (Timepoint 4) collects results from patient-funded ctDNA testing performed as part of routine care.
The primary outcome is the cumulative MRD detection rate across the three pre-specified post-surgical timepoints (Timepoint 1, Timepoint 2, and Timepoint 3). Secondary outcomes include the association between ctDNA status and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), molecular clearance rate at Timepoint 3, lead time of molecular relapse over imaging, and platform performance. ctDNA results are reported back to the treating physician for reference but do not mandate treatment changes-all clinical decisions remain at the physician's discretion per standard guidelines.
This study aims to generate the prospective evidence base needed to design future ctDNA-guided interventional trials in pancreatic cancer.
BACKGROUND Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal solid tumors. Even after curative resection, 70-80% of patients relapse within 2 years. Conventional surveillance with CT imaging and serum CA 19-9 detects recurrence only after macroscopic tumor burden has accumulated, missing the window for early intervention. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a sensitive biomarker for minimal residual disease (MRD) in colorectal and lung cancers, but standardized prospective ctDNA monitoring data in pancreatic cancer remain limited.
PLATFORM
K-4CARE Lite (Gene Solutions JSC, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam) is a comprehensive genomic profiling platform combining:
DESIGN Single-center, prospective, non-interventional observational cohort study at Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. ctDNA results are returned to the treating physician for reference but do not mandate any treatment change; all therapeutic decisions follow standard adjuvant chemotherapy practice and physician discretion.
POPULATION N = 30 adults (aged 20 years or older) with histologically confirmed PDAC who have undergone R0 or R1 (margin close <1 mm) curative resection (pancreaticoduodenectomy, distal pancreatectomy, or total pancreatectomy), with post-operative pathologic stage at least pT1 N0 or any N1+, no radiologic evidence of residual or distant disease within 4 weeks before enrollment, and intent to receive adjuvant chemotherapy.
SAMPLING TIMELINE
PRIMARY OUTCOME Cumulative MRD detection rate across the three pre-specified post-surgical timepoints (Timepoint 1, Timepoint 2, and Timepoint 3), defined as the proportion of participants with at least one tracking mutation detected at variant allele frequency above the K-4CARE Lite platform's limit of detection at one or more timepoints.
SECONDARY OUTCOMES
EXPLORATORY OUTCOMES
STATISTICAL METHODS Primarily descriptive. MRD detection rate reported as percentage with 95% Wilson confidence interval. Survival analyses by Kaplan-Meier with log-rank tests, exploratory given the limited sample size. Categorical comparisons by Fisher's exact test. Continuous comparisons by Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Cox proportional hazards regression limited to 2 to 3 covariates given the sample size. Analyses in R (version 4.0 or higher) or SAS (version 9.4 or higher); two-sided p < 0.05. Missing data not imputed.
FUNDING Timepoint 1 through Timepoint 3 ctDNA testing is funded by the principal investigator's intramural Body of Medical Research Project (BMRP) grant from Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Gene Solutions provides the testing service only and has no role in study design, data analysis, or publication decisions. Timepoint 4 self-funded testing by participants is not reimbursed by the study.
SAMPLE LOGISTICS Samples are received in Taiwan at NEWCL and forwarded to Gene Solutions JSC, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, for sequencing. Specimens carry a study code only; no identifiable patient information accompanies the sample.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Resected PDAC patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy | Adults with histologically confirmed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who have undergone R0 or R1 (margin <1 mm) curative resection at Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, with intent to receive adjuvant chemotherapy. All participants follow the same ctDNA monitoring schedule (Timepoint 1, Timepoint 2, and Timepoint 3 are mandatory; Timepoint 4 is passive data collection from self-funded testing). |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Cumulative Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Detection Rate Across Three Post-Surgical Timepoints | The proportion of participants with circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detected at one or more of the three pre-specified post-surgical surveillance timepoints (Timepoint 1, Timepoint 2, or Timepoint 3). A timepoint is classified as ctDNA-positive if at least one tracking mutation is detected at variant allele frequency above the K-4CARE Lite platform's limit of detection (0.005%). Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is recognized as a moderate-to-low ctDNA shedder, with reported single-timepoint post-resection detection rates of 30-60%; cumulative detection across serial timepoints is hypothesized to improve sensitivity for assay-defined minimal residual disease. Reported as percentage with 95% Wilson confidence interval, with stratified contribution by individual timepoint. | From Timepoint 1 (Week 4 to Week 10 after surgery) through Timepoint 3 (approximately Month 6 after surgery, at completion of adjuvant chemotherapy), spanning up to 8 months per participant. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| ctDNA Molecular Clearance Rate at Timepoint 3 (End of Adjuvant Chemotherapy) | Proportion of participants with negative ctDNA result at Timepoint 3 (no tracking mutation detected above the limit of detection), regardless of Timepoint 1 or Timepoint 2 status. Includes both newly cleared participants (positive at Timepoint 1, negative at Timepoint 3) and persistently negative participants. | At Timepoint 3, defined as completion of adjuvant chemotherapy (approximately Month 6 after surgery) or earlier termination. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Adults with histologically confirmed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent R0 or R1 (margin <1 mm) curative resection at Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, recruited consecutively from the oncology and general surgical outpatient clinics during their post-operative follow-up. No public advertising or open recruitment used.
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wen-Kuan Huang, MD,PhD | Contact | 886-3-3281200 | 2524 | medfox0924@cgmh.org.tw |
| Chun-Nan Yeh, MD | Contact | 886-3-3281200 | 3219 | ycn@cgmh.org.tw |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital | Taoyuan | Taoyuan | 333 | Taiwan |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35809752 | Background | Pascual J, Attard G, Bidard FC, Curigliano G, De Mattos-Arruda L, Diehn M, Italiano A, Lindberg J, Merker JD, Montagut C, Normanno N, Pantel K, Pentheroudakis G, Popat S, Reis-Filho JS, Tie J, Seoane J, Tarazona N, Yoshino T, Turner NC. ESMO recommendations on the use of circulating tumour DNA assays for patients with cancer: a report from the ESMO Precision Medicine Working Group. Ann Oncol. 2022 Aug;33(8):750-768. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.05.520. Epub 2022 Jul 6. | |
| 30575490 |
Not provided
Not provided
Individual participant data will not be shared due to the limited sample size and the sensitive nature of genomic sequencing data. De-identified summary results will be reported in peer-reviewed publications and at scientific conferences.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010190 | Pancreatic Neoplasms |
| D018365 | Neoplasm, Residual |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D004701 | Endocrine Gland Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue collected at baseline, and whole blood (20 mL per timepoint at Timepoint 1, Timepoint 2, and Timepoint 3) with buffy coat. Plasma and tissue DNA are extracted for next-generation sequencing on the K-4CARE Lite platform.
| ctDNA Variant Allele Frequency (VAF) Kinetics During Adjuvant Treatment | For each participant, the slope of the highest variant allele frequency (VAF) of any tracking mutation is computed for up to two intervals: (a) Timepoint 1 to Timepoint 2 (intra-treatment, approximately 12 weeks apart, capturing early response to adjuvant chemotherapy); and (b) Timepoint 1 to Timepoint 3 (full-course, approximately 6-month span, capturing end-of-treatment status). Each interval is categorized as rising (2-fold or greater VAF increase), falling (2-fold or greater decrease), stable (no 2-fold or greater change between detectable values), undetectable-throughout (negative at both timepoints), or new emergence (negative at Timepoint 1, converting to positive at Timepoint 2 or Timepoint 3). Reported per-participant per-interval; aggregate distribution reported as proportions, with sub-analysis comparing Timepoint 1-to-Timepoint 2 versus Timepoint 1-to-Timepoint 3 trajectories. Participants missing one of the two later timepoints contribute only the available interval. | From Timepoint 1 (Week 4 to Week 10 after surgery) through Timepoint 3 (approximately Month 6 after surgery, at completion of adjuvant chemotherapy), spanning up to 8 months per participant. |
| Disease-Free Survival (DFS) | Time from date of curative surgery to the first radiologically or pathologically confirmed disease recurrence, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Estimated by Kaplan-Meier method; participants without recurrence or death are censored at the date of last disease assessment. Stratified analysis comparing ctDNA-positive versus ctDNA-negative participants at Timepoint 1 by log-rank test. | From date of surgery up to Month 36 (last enrolled participant followed for at least 12 months after Timepoint 3) |
| Overall Survival (OS) | Time from date of curative surgery to death from any cause. Participants alive at the data cut-off are censored at last known alive date. Estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. | From date of surgery up to Month 36. |
| Lead Time of Molecular Relapse Over Imaging | Interval (in days) between the date of first ctDNA conversion from negative to positive (during the monitoring window spanning Timepoint 2 through Timepoint 4) and the date of radiologically confirmed disease recurrence. Reported as median with interquartile range among participants who experience both ctDNA conversion and imaging recurrence. | From Timepoint 1 (Week 4 to Week 10 after surgery) to end of follow-up, up to Month 36 |
| Background |
| Conroy T, Hammel P, Hebbar M, Ben Abdelghani M, Wei AC, Raoul JL, Chone L, Francois E, Artru P, Biagi JJ, Lecomte T, Assenat E, Faroux R, Ychou M, Volet J, Sauvanet A, Breysacher G, Di Fiore F, Cripps C, Kavan P, Texereau P, Bouhier-Leporrier K, Khemissa-Akouz F, Legoux JL, Juzyna B, Gourgou S, O'Callaghan CJ, Jouffroy-Zeller C, Rat P, Malka D, Castan F, Bachet JB; Canadian Cancer Trials Group and the Unicancer-GI-PRODIGE Group. FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine as Adjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 20;379(25):2395-2406. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1809775. |
| 39920551 | Background | Kobayashi S, Nakamura Y, Hashimoto T, Bando H, Oki E, Karasaki T, Horinouchi H, Ozaki Y, Iwata H, Kato T, Miyake H, Ohba A, Ikeda M, Chiyoda T, Hasegawa K, Fujisawa T, Matsuura K, Namikawa K, Yajima S, Yoshino T, Hasegawa K. Japan society of clinical oncology position paper on appropriate clinical use of molecular residual disease (MRD) testing. Int J Clin Oncol. 2025 Apr;30(4):605-654. doi: 10.1007/s10147-024-02683-0. Epub 2025 Feb 7. |
| 41696920 | Background | Borges FC, Pinto MS, Borges MF, Joao AA, Francisco E, Sousa M, Aral M, Oliveira V, Cunha JF, Mehrabi A, Berchtold C, Goncalves G, Bailey P, Buchler MW. The Role of Circulating Tumor DNA in Surgical Management of Pancreatic Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2026 Feb 16. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000007036. Online ahead of print. |
| 30240661 | Background | Bernard V, Kim DU, San Lucas FA, Castillo J, Allenson K, Mulu FC, Stephens BM, Huang J, Semaan A, Guerrero PA, Kamyabi N, Zhao J, Hurd MW, Koay EJ, Taniguchi CM, Herman JM, Javle M, Wolff R, Katz M, Varadhachary G, Maitra A, Alvarez HA. Circulating Nucleic Acids Are Associated With Outcomes of Patients With Pancreatic Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2019 Jan;156(1):108-118.e4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.09.022. Epub 2018 Sep 19. |
| 27993964 | Background | Pietrasz D, Pecuchet N, Garlan F, Didelot A, Dubreuil O, Doat S, Imbert-Bismut F, Karoui M, Vaillant JC, Taly V, Laurent-Puig P, Bachet JB. Plasma Circulating Tumor DNA in Pancreatic Cancer Patients Is a Prognostic Marker. Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Jan 1;23(1):116-123. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0806. Epub 2016 Dec 19. |
| 31250894 | Background | Lee B, Lipton L, Cohen J, Tie J, Javed AA, Li L, Goldstein D, Burge M, Cooray P, Nagrial A, Tebbutt NC, Thomson B, Nikfarjam M, Harris M, Haydon A, Lawrence B, Tai DWM, Simons K, Lennon AM, Wolfgang CL, Tomasetti C, Papadopoulos N, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Gibbs P. Circulating tumor DNA as a potential marker of adjuvant chemotherapy benefit following surgery for localized pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol. 2019 Sep 1;30(9):1472-1478. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz200. |
| 31142500 | Background | Groot VP, Mosier S, Javed AA, Teinor JA, Gemenetzis G, Ding D, Haley LM, Yu J, Burkhart RA, Hasanain A, Debeljak M, Kamiyama H, Narang A, Laheru DA, Zheng L, Lin MT, Gocke CD, Fishman EK, Hruban RH, Goggins MG, Molenaar IQ, Cameron JL, Weiss MJ, Velculescu VE, He J, Wolfgang CL, Eshleman JR. Circulating Tumor DNA as a Clinical Test in Resected Pancreatic Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Aug 15;25(16):4973-4984. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-0197. Epub 2019 May 29. |
| D004066 |
| Digestive System Diseases |
| D010182 | Pancreatic Diseases |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
| D009385 | Neoplastic Processes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |