Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effect of remimazolam sedation on outcomes of mechanically ventilated ICU patients through a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled, pilot study.
Worldwide, approximately 13-20 million patients receive mechanical ventilation in intensive care units (ICUs) each year. As a crucial life-support modality, mechanical ventilation is widely used for the management of respiratory failure due to various causes, as well as for respiratory support during anesthesia and after surgery. However, mechanical ventilation may also induce anxiety, pain, and patient-ventilator asynchrony, leading to increased oxygen consumption, a higher risk of barotrauma, and potentially worse patient outcomes. Therefore, patients undergoing mechanical ventilation usually require sedatives to improve comfort and safety, reduce anxiety, optimize ventilation efficacy, and decrease the incidence of complications.
In current clinical practice, various sedatives such as midazolam, propofol, and dexmedetomidine are widely used, all of which can effectively achieve sedation. Midazolam is a classic benzodiazepine sedative widely used in the ICU. It exerts central inhibitory effects by enhancing γ-GABA-mediated neurotransmission, thereby producing sedation, anxiolysis, and anterograde amnesia. However, it has a relatively slow onset and tends to accumulate in the body, leading to prolonged recovery time. Propofol is known for its rapid onset, short duration of action, and quick recovery after discontinuation. Its depth of sedation is positively correlated with the administered dose. Nevertheless, propofol may increase hemodynamic instability by reducing vascular tone and decreasing venous return, and it also exerts respiratory depression. Moreover, high-dose or long-term use of propofol can potentially cause fatal propofol infusion syndrome. Dexmedetomidine, a selective α2-adrenergic receptor agonist, reduces sympathetic overactivity by inhibiting norepinephrine release from the locus coeruleus and competitively binding to α2 receptors, thereby producing sedation, anxiolysis, and mild analgesia. Patients sedated with dexmedetomidine are relatively easy to arouse and have a lower incidence of respiratory depression, but this drug tends to cause hypotension and bradycardia.
Remimazolam, a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine sedative, exerts its sedative effects by binding to and enhancing the activity of GABAA receptors, thereby reducing neuronal excitability. It features rapid onset, predictable sedative effect, lack of accumulation in the body, quick metabolism, mild cardiorespiratory depression, and low dependence on hepatic and renal function. The sedative effect of remimazolam can be reversed by the specific benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil. Given these properties, remimazolam is considered an ideal sedative in the ICU and an excellent choice for sedation in critically ill patients. In recent years, it has been gradually applied in procedural sedation and general anesthesia. In a multicenter, randomized, single-blind, non-inferiority trial of mechanically ventilated ICU patients, remimazolam was found to be non-inferior to propofol in achieving short-term light sedation. In addition, a preliminary study by Tang Y and colleagues showed that remimazolam was similarly effective and safe for long-term sedation in mechanically ventilated ICU patients compared with propofol [10].
As an emerging drug, remimazolam has a relatively short history of clinical use. Current research on this drug is mainly concentrated in the fields of endoscopy and anesthesiology, with relatively few studies focusing on its sedative application in ICU patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of ective, randomized controlled, pilot study was conducted to evaluate the effect of remimazolam sedation on outcomes of mechanically ventilated ICU patients.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| remimazolam | Experimental |
| |
| propofol | Active Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remimazolam | Drug | In the intervention group, patients with a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score of -3 to 0 were given remimazolam besylate for injection at a loading dose of 0.08 mg/kg infused intravenously over 10 min, followed by a continuous infusion at a rate of 0.2 mg/kg/h. When dose adjustment was required, each step was 0.1-0.2 mg/kg/h, with a dose range of 0-2 mg/kg/h, until the target sedation level (RASS: -3 to 0) was achieved. If the target sedation level was not reached, an additional bolus dose of 0.08 mg/kg remimazolam besylate could be administered. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| 28-day ventilator-free days | 28-day |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of delirium | Up to 28 days | |
| 28-day shock-free days | 28-day | |
| ICU length of stay |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jingyuan Xu, M.D. | Contact | 00862583262500 | xujingyuanmail@163.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhongda Hospital | Recruiting | Nanjing | Jiangsu | 210009 | China |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C522201 | remimazolam |
| D015742 | Propofol |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010636 | Phenols |
| D001555 | Benzene Derivatives |
| D006841 | Hydrocarbons, Aromatic |
| D006844 | Hydrocarbons, Cyclic |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| propofol | Drug | In the control group, patients received propofol emulsion injection at a loading dose of 0.3 mg/kg/h injected over 1 min, followed by a continuous infusion at a rate of 0.3 mg/kg/h. Dose adjustments were made in increments of 0.3-0.6 mg/kg/h, within a dose range of 0.3-4 mg/kg/h, to achieve the target sedation level (RASS: -3 to 0). |
|
| Up to 30 days |
| hospital length of stay | Up to 60 days |
| 28-day mortality | 28-day |
| D006838 |
| Hydrocarbons |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |