Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a prospective, observational, multicenter study designed to evaluate the real-world efficacy and safety of H42®, a collagen hydrogel, in the treatment of periodontal pockets. The study will include 153 observations related to 38 subjects (aged 18-65) undergoing periodontal treatment in routine clinical practice. H42® is intended for filling, reinforcing, and repairing periodontal pockets.
The primary objective is to evaluate the change in Periodontal Pocket Depth (PPD) from baseline to week 12.
Secondary objectives include assessing:
Participants undergo a baseline visit (V1) and six follow-up visits (V2-V7) over 12 weeks:
Clinical photography is used throughout the study to support the evaluation of gingival inflammatory status.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| H42® Collagen Hydrogel for the non-surgical treatment of periodontal pockets | Device | Application of H42® collagen hydrogel for filling, reinforcing, and repairing periodontal pockets. Following standard mechanical instrumentation (scaling and root planing), the hydrogel is applied to a maximum of 5 periodontal pockets per patient (153 total pockets). The treatment is part of routine clinical practice to evaluate its real-world efficacy and safety over a 12-week period. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change from Baseline in Periodontal Pocket Depth (PPD) at 12 weeks following application of H42® hydrogel in 153 periodontal pockets | Evaluation of the reduction in PPD, measured in millimeters (mm), from baseline to week 12. The H42® collagen hydrogel is applied to 153 periodontal pockets immediately following mechanical instrumentation for the removal of biofilm and mineralized deposits. The change is calculated as the difference between the measurement at the 12-week follow-up and the baseline value recorded. | Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change from Baseline in Clinical Attachment Level (CAL) at Weeks 4, 8, and 12 | CAL will be evaluated to assess periodontal tissue regeneration. Measurement is calculated using the formula: CAL = PPD - (CEJ to FGM distance), where PPD is Probing Pocket Depth, CEJ is Cemento-Enamel Junction, and FGM is Free Gingival Margin. Measurements will be taken in millimeters (mm). | Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
The dataset includes 153 observations related to 38 subjects, with multiple observations per subject due to different tooth positions. The study was conducted in two dental clinics located in Italy.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Marisa Roncati, Dental Degree | Studio Parma Benfenati Corso della Giovecca 155/a 44121 - Ferrara (Italy) | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Studio Brecodent | Dongo | Como | 22014 | Italy | ||
| Studio Parma Benfenati |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background | Schwartz, G. Estimating the Dimension of the Model. Ann Sturist 1978; 6:461-464. | ||
| Background | Akaike, H. A Bayesian Analysis of the Minimum AIC Procedure. Ann Insr Stutisr Murh Part A 1978; 30: Q-14. | ||
| Background | Periodontology, A. A. P. (2001). Glossary of periodontal terms. Chicago (IL): The American Academy of Periodontology. | ||
| Background | Spiegelhalter, D. J., Abrams, K. R., & Myles, J. P. (2004). Bayesian Approaches to Clinical Trials and Health-Care Evaluation. John Wiley & Sons. DOI:10.1002/0470092602 | ||
| 35102150 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Change from Baseline in Sulcus Bleeding Index (SBI) at Weeks 4, 8, and 12 | SBI will be used to assess gingival inflammation. Scoring is based on Mühlemann and Son (1971) criteria on a scale from 0 to 5, where: 0 = normal texture and color, no bleeding; 1 = apparently normal, bleeding on probing; 2 = bleeding on probing, color change, no edema; 3 = bleeding on probing, color change, slight edema; 4 = bleeding on probing, color change, obvious edema (or bleeding on probing and obvious edema); 5 = bleeding on probing, spontaneous bleeding, color change, and marked edema. Higher scores indicate greater inflammation. | Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 |
| Change from Baseline in Percentage of Bleeding on Probing (BOP) sites at Weeks 4, 8, and 12 | BOP will be assessed to evaluate the extent of periodontal inflammation. Bleeding will be recorded as present (1) or absent (0) within 15 seconds following pocket probing. The Full-Mouth Bleeding Score (FMBS) will be calculated as a percentage using the formula: (number of bleeding sites / total number of evaluated sites) x 100. Values range from 0% to 100%, with lower percentages indicating better periodontal health. | Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 |
| Change from Baseline in Plaque Index (PI) at Weeks 4, 8, and 12 | PI will be used to evaluate the presence and thickness of plaque at the gingival margin. Scoring is based on the Silness and Löe Plaque Index criteria on a scale from 0 to 3, where: 0 = no plaque; 1 = a film of plaque adhering to the free gingival margin and adjacent area of the tooth, recognized only by running a probe across the tooth surface; 2 = moderate accumulation of soft deposits within the gingival pocket, or on the tooth and gingival margin, visible to the naked eye; 3 = abundance of soft matter within the gingival pocket and/or on the tooth and gingival margin. Higher scores indicate greater plaque accumulation. The final value represents the patient's average score across all examined surfaces. | Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 |
| Change from Baseline in Gingival Index (GI) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 12 | GI will be assessed to evaluate the severity and qualitative changes of gingival inflammation. Scoring is based on the Löe and Silness Gingival Index criteria on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3, where: 0 = normal gingiva; 1 = mild inflammation, slight change in color, slight edema, no bleeding on probing; 2 = moderate inflammation, redness, edema, and glazing, bleeding on probing; 3 = severe inflammation, marked redness and edema, ulceration, tendency to spontaneous bleeding. Higher scores indicate more severe gingival inflammation. | Baseline, Weeks 1, Weeks 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 |
| Change from Baseline in Patient-Reported Pain Score at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 | Patient-reported pain will be assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The scale ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 indicates "the worst possible pain". Higher scores represent greater pain intensity. | Baseline, Weeks 1, Weeks 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 |
| Investigator Global Assessment of Performance (IGAP) at Week 12 | Global Performance of the tested device as assessed by the Investigator (IGAP) through visual evaluation of standardized photographs taken during clinical visits. The evaluation is rated using a 4-point Likert scale: 1 = very good performance; 2 = good performance; 3 = moderate performance; 4 = poor performance. Higher scores indicate worse performance or lower efficacy of the tested device. | Week 12 |
| Patient Degree of Satisfaction at Week 12 | Patient self-reported degree of satisfaction with the treatment/device, evaluated through a 4-point satisfaction scale. The response options are defined as follows: 1 = very satisfied; 2 = satisfied; 3 = moderately satisfied; 4 = not satisfied. Higher scores indicate lower patient satisfaction. | Week 12 |
| Change from Baseline in radiographic Periodontal Pocket Depth at Week 12 | Radiographic evaluation to assess the change from baseline to Week 12 in parameters related to the periodontal pocket depth. Measurements will be performed on standardized intraoral radiographs to quantify the vertical bone loss or defect associated with the pocket. | Baseline, Week 12 |
| Percentage of participants with absence of infection (Suppuration) from Week 1 to Week 12 | Clinical evaluation to assess the absence of infection, specifically defined as the absence of suppuration (pus formation), at the treated site as evaluated by the Investigator. The presence or absence of suppuration will be assessed at each post-baseline visit. Results will be expressed as the percentage of participants achieving complete absence of suppuration compared to baseline. | Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, and Week 12 |
| Ferrara |
| Ferrara |
| 44121 |
| Italy |
| Chung HM, Park JY, Ko KA, Kim CS, Choi SH, Lee JS. Periodontal probing on digital images compared to clinical measurements in periodontitis patients. Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 31;12(1):1616. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04695-6. |
| 31878278 | Background | Levrini L, Paracchini L, Nosotti MG. The Capacity of Periodontal Gel to Occupy the Spaces Inside the Periodontal Pockets Using Computational Fluid Dynamic. Dent J (Basel). 2019 Dec 24;8(1):1. doi: 10.3390/dj8010001. |
| 14121956 | Background | LOE H, SILNESS J. PERIODONTAL DISEASE IN PREGNANCY. I. PREVALENCE AND SEVERITY. Acta Odontol Scand. 1963 Dec;21:533-51. doi: 10.3109/00016356309011240. No abstract available. |
| 14158464 | Background | SILNESS J, LOE H. PERIODONTAL DISEASE IN PREGNANCY. II. CORRELATION BETWEEN ORAL HYGIENE AND PERIODONTAL CONDTION. Acta Odontol Scand. 1964 Feb;22:121-35. doi: 10.3109/00016356408993968. No abstract available. |
| 5315729 | Background | Muhlemann HR, Son S. Gingival sulcus bleeding--a leading symptom in initial gingivitis. Helv Odontol Acta. 1971 Oct;15(2):107-13. No abstract available. |
| 26846817 | Background | Barbosa VL, Angst PD, Finger Stadler A, Oppermann RV, Gomes SC. Clinical attachment loss: estimation by direct and indirect methods. Int Dent J. 2016 Jun;66(3):144-9. doi: 10.1111/idj.12218. Epub 2016 Feb 5. |
| 29926943 | Background | Jepsen S, Caton JG, Albandar JM, Bissada NF, Bouchard P, Cortellini P, Demirel K, de Sanctis M, Ercoli C, Fan J, Geurs NC, Hughes FJ, Jin L, Kantarci A, Lalla E, Madianos PN, Matthews D, McGuire MK, Mills MP, Preshaw PM, Reynolds MA, Sculean A, Susin C, West NX, Yamazaki K. Periodontal manifestations of systemic diseases and developmental and acquired conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 3 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Periodontol. 2018 Jun;89 Suppl 1:S237-S248. doi: 10.1002/JPER.17-0733. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010514 | Periodontal Pocket |
| D010518 | Periodontitis |
| D007249 | Inflammation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010510 | Periodontal Diseases |
| D009059 | Mouth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided