Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the feasibility, safety, and tolerance of MRI-guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) for the treatment of drug-resistant focal epilepsy in adult patients with MRI-visible brain lesions.
The main question it aims to answer is whether HIFU can safely and effectively achieve the target ablative temperature (≥52 °C) within epileptogenic lesions, thereby enabling successful thermal ablation of the epileptogenic focus.
This pilot, single-center study is single arm, prospective, non-comparative and uncontrolled. This will take place over a period of 24 months. After information (V1), inclusion (V2) and presurgical (V3) visits, a surgical visit will be performed during hospitalization in the neurosurgery department (V4) for HIFU therapy and 5 follow-up consultation visits (V5, V6, V7, V8, and V9 to J7, M1, M3, M6, and M12).
Epilepsy is a common, long-lasting neurological disorder with significant social ramifications. In France, it is estimated that over 500,000 individuals are affected by epilepsy, with 50,000 experiencing drug-resistant partial epilepsy. Approximately 10,000 patients with drug-resistant partial epilepsy may benefit from neurosurgical treatment to excise their epileptogenic focus. However, only 300 operations are performed annually in France. Epilepsy surgery not only has medical benefits (with 50-80% of operated patients being seizure-free), but also reduces the risk of excess mortality in this population. Furthermore, it is a cost-effective solution, as drug-resistant epileptic patients can cost up to $138,000 in treatment and monitoring throughout their lifetime. High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) is a noninvasive method that uses heat to destroy brain lesions, leading to coagulation and necrosis of the lesion under control. It has been successfully used to treat essential tremors, Parkinson's disease, and neuropathic pain, and may be used to treat epilepsy lesions that are inaccessible to conventional surgery, located in eloquent areas, or in patients with contraindications to general anesthesia. The goal of this study is to assess the feasibility, tolerance, and safety of HIFU use in lesions responsible for drug-resistant epilepsy, as this represents the first use of HIFU for this indication.
Main objective : To assess the feasibility of employing HIFU-based thermoablation for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy caused by intracerebral lesions.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Assigned Interventions | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MR-guided HIFU thermoablation | Procedure | - HIFU-based thermoablation: non-invasive brain tissue ablation by a MRI-guided transcranial ultrasound (MRgFUS) system. • Installation of a stereotaxy frame: 4 cranial skin points under local anesthesia with Xylocaine, Perfalgan IV 2g in IVL, usual brushing protocol with iodized alcohol, and removal of stereotaxy frame • MRI with contrast agent administration acquisition and definition of the area to be treated and ultrasound parameters by neurosurgeons, neuroradiologists, and physicists. • Realization of thermoablation under real-time control using MRI and clinical control. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Target ablative temperature | Achievement of the target ablative temperature (at least one timepoint at 52 °C (15 °C above body temperature)) on calorimetric MRI sequences performed in real time during HIFU treatment (real-time quantitative measurements + CSV data extracted at the end of the procedure). | During the procedure between 60 and 75 days after inclusion |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Post-intervention complications of grade≥2 | Clinical safety: Post-intervention complications at D30 of grade≥2 (complications requiring therapeutic intervention or after-effects or death) according to Mathon et al., Journal of Neurology, 2015. | From day 0 to day 30 after the procedure. |
| Morphological MRI |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Drug-sensitive epilepsy
Patients exhibiting suboptimal adherence to medication
Individuals under legal protective measures
Patients presenting contraindications to Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), such as the presence of metal fragments, allergy to gadolinium, etc.
Patients with serious and uncontrolled psychiatric disorders
Pregnant women. Women of reproductive capacity were mandated to use oral contraceptives throughout the study duration.
Contraindications related to ExAblate treatment:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bertrand Mathon, MD PhD | Contact | + 33 1 42 16 34 08 | bertrand.mathon@aphp.fr |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004827 | Epilepsy |
| D000069279 | Drug Resistant Epilepsy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004569 | Electroencephalography |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003943 | Diagnostic Techniques, Neurological |
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
| D004568 | Electrodiagnosis |
Not provided
Not provided
This pilot, single-center study is single arm, prospective, non-comparative and uncontrolled.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| EEG | Diagnostic Test | Surface EEG: assessment of residual seizures and interictal epileptiform activity. |
|
| MRI | Diagnostic Test | Brain MRI in the Neuroradiology department to monitor lesion volume, possible reactive edema, and possible mass effect. The imaging protocol will include 3D T1, 3D T2, 3D FLAIR, SWI, Diffusion and 3D T1 after gadolinium injection sequences. |
|
Evaluation measured by morphological MRI corresponding to necrosis induced by MRI (axes, volume, ablation margins). |
| From the day of the procedure up to 12 months after the procedure. |
| Thermometric MRI monitoring during HIFU thermoablation | At D0 during the procedure |
| Cumulative thermal dose during HIFU thermoablation | At D0 during the procedure |
| ILAE classification | At 12 months after the procedure |
| Frequency of epileptic seizures | Number of epileptic seizures using the seizure diary starting | From inclusion up to 12 months after the procedure |
| Intensity of epileptic seizures | Intensity of epileptic seizures using the seizure diary | From inclusion up to 12 months after the procedure |
| Change in antiepileptic treatment | Number of antiepileptic drugs, modification in antiepileptic dose. | From inclusion up to 12 months after the procedure |
| Antiepileptic effectiveness EEG | Surface EEG in comparison with pretreatment EEG (seizures, interictal abnormalities). | From inclusion up to 12 months after the procedure |
| Neuropsychological evaluation | Change from pre-treatment assessment performed in the inclusion work-up of the neuropsychological assessment at M12 | At inclusion and at 12 months |
| Evaluation of quality of life | Mean change of global score of quality of life according to the quality of life in epilepsy inventory-31 (QOLIE-31) questionnaire from pre-treatment assessment during the inclusion work-up at M12. | At inclusion and at 12 months |
| MRI-assessed radiological safety | Thermometric MRI monitoring on D0, induced edema on D7 and D30 | From the day of the procedure up to days 30 after the procedure |
| Adverse events related to HIFU treatment | Frequency, intensity, and severity of adverse effects collected during treatment and follow-up period | From the D0 the day of procedure up to 12 months after the procedure |