Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This randomized controlled trial compares blood flow restriction (BFR) resistance training (leg press and seated knee extension at 30% 1RM) versus BFR cycling (stationary cycling at low resistance) in 60 athletes (aged 18-40 years) diagnosed with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Both interventions are delivered over 8 weeks (3 sessions/week) with a pneumatic cuff set at 80% limb occlusion pressure. Primary outcomes include pain intensity (NPRS), quadriceps strength (handheld dynamometer), and functional ability (Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Scale), assessed at baseline and post-intervention.
Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is among the most prevalent musculoskeletal conditions in athletes, with reported prevalence of 30-40% in sports populations. High-load resistance training is the conventional rehabilitation approach but often exacerbates joint stress and reduces adherence. Blood flow restriction (BFR) training enables strength gains at low loads by applying a pneumatic cuff at 80% LOP on the proximal thigh.
This trial compares two BFR modalities:
All sessions are supervised one-on-one by a physiotherapist. Assessments are conducted at baseline and week 8. The study is single-blinded (outcome assessor blinded). Randomization via computer-generated sequence. Statistical analysis via SPSS v27 (paired t-test / Wilcoxon for within-group; independent t-test / Mann-Whitney for between-group, alpha=0.05).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| BFR Resistance Training Group | Active Comparator | Participants perform leg press and seated knee extension exercises at 30% of 1RM with a pneumatic cuff (12 cm wide, Delfi Medical) applied to the proximal thigh at 80% limb occlusion pressure (LOP). Protocol: 1 set of 30 + 3 sets of 15 repetitions, with 60-second rest between sets (cuff deflated). Frequency: 3 sessions/week for 8 weeks (24 sessions total). 1RM re-estimated every 2 weeks for progressive load adjustment. Warm-up: 10 min low-resistance cycling (no BFR). Cool-down: 5 min lower-limb stretching. |
|
| BFR Cycling Group | Experimental | Participants perform stationary cycling at low resistance targeting RPE 11-13, with a pneumatic cuff (12 cm wide, Delfi Medical) applied to the proximal thigh at 80% LOP. Protocol: 4 x 5-minute cycling intervals at 70-80 RPM, with 1-minute rest between intervals (cuff deflated). Frequency: 3 sessions/week for 8 weeks (24 sessions total). Cadence increased by 5 RPM if RPE <11. Warm-up: 10 min low-resistance cycling (no BFR). Cool-down: 5 min lower-limb stretching. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blood Flow Restriction Resistance Training | Device | Participants will undergo blood flow restriction (BFR) resistance training using a pneumatic cuff applied to the proximal thigh at 80% limb occlusion pressure. Exercises include leg press and seated knee extension performed at 30% of one-repetition maximum (1RM). Training will be conducted for 8 weeks, with supervised sessions 3 times per week. Cuff pressure will be monitored and adjusted using BP cuff. The aim is to improve quadriceps strength and reduce pain in patients with patellofemoral pain. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Quadriceps Strength - Handheld Dynamometer | Isometric quadriceps muscle strength measured in Newtons using a calibrated handheld dynamometer (ICC > 0.90). Measurement taken in a standardized seated position at 60° knee flexion. | Baseline (Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 8) |
| Pain Intensity - Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) | Self-reported pain intensity rated on a 0-10 scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain). The NPRS has excellent test-retest reliability (ICC 0.95). | Baseline (Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 8) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Functional Outcomes - Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS) | 13-item patient-reported outcome measure assessing functional limitations due to anterior knee pain. Scored 0-100 (higher = better function). High internal consistency (α = 0.83-0.91). | Baseline (Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 8) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haroon Khan, MS. Sports Physical Therapy | Contact | +923000526711 | haroonkhan2k00@gmail.com | |
| Hafsah Gul Khattak, DPT, MS-NMPT | Contact | 923457170732 | hafsahgull_khattak@yahoo.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Hafsah Gul Khattak, DPT, MS-NMPT | IBADAT INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY, ISLAMABAD (IIUI) | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ibadat International University, Islamabad (Iiui) | Recruiting | Islamabad | 46000 | Pakistan |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study is a parallel-group randomized controlled trial comparing two active intervention arms: blood flow restriction resistance training and blood flow restriction cycling in patients with patellofemoral pain.
Not provided
Not provided
This is a single-blinded study in which the outcome assessor is blinded to group allocation. Participants and treating physiotherapists are aware of the assigned intervention due to the nature of exercise-based rehabilitation. Efforts are made to standardize instructions and interaction across both groups to minimize bias.
|
| Blood Flow Restriction Cycling | Device | Participants will perform stationary cycling combined with blood flow restriction (BFR) applied to the proximal thigh at 80% limb occlusion pressure. Cycling will be performed at low resistance with controlled cadence for 8 weeks, 3 sessions per week under physiotherapist supervision. The protocol includes structured cycling intervals with rest periods and continuous monitoring of pain and perceived exertion. The intervention aims to improve quadriceps strength, reduce pain, and enhance functional outcomes in patients with patellofemoral pain. |
|
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D046788 | Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided