Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this double-blind parallel-arm randomized controlled trial is to learn if a probiotic supplement (containing a new strain derived from L. reuteri) alters outcomes related to symptom severity and transit time in adults with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The main question it aims to answer is:
Does the probiotic alter IBS symptom severity?
Researchers will compare the probiotic to a placebo (a lookalike substance that contains no probiotic) to see if the probiotic works to alter outcomes.
Participants will:
Be randomized to either take the probiotic supplement or placebo supplement daily for 12 weeks.
Visit the lab for 4 study visits (visit 1: screening and informed consent; visit 2: randomization, data collection, beginning the intervention; visit 3: end of intervention and data collection; visit 4: 3 month post intervention follow up and data collection).
Provide biological samples (blood, stool, saliva, urine) Complete questionnaires
The BIO-IBS study is a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial investigating whether a combination probiotic improves symptoms in adults with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The trial also explores biological mechanisms and predictors of treatment response.
Background & Rationale IBS is a common disorder of gut-brain interaction (~4% prevalence in Sweden). Current treatments include dietary, pharmacological, and psychological approaches. Increasing evidence suggests the gut microbiome plays a key role, prompting interest in probiotics.
Aims
1. Evaluate effect of probiotic combination on IBS symptoms. 2, Identify predictors of response. 3. Investigate IBS pathophysiology and biomarkers.
Study Design
Type: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group Participants: 252 adults with IBS Randomization: 1:1 (probiotic vs placebo) Treatment duration: 12 weeks Follow-up: 3 months post-treatment Timeline: Recruitment starting April 2026 lasting ~3 years
Participants Inclusion Criteria
Adult (≥18 years), IBS (Rome IV criteria) IBS-SSS > 75 BMI 18.5-35 Able to consent and complete Swedish questionnaires
Key Exclusion Criteria
Significant gastrointestinal or systemic disease Recent antibiotics (within 3 months) or probiotics (within 2 weeks) Opioid use Pregnancy/breastfeeding Significant lab abnormalities (e.g., high fecal calprotectin) Major lifestyle/treatment changes
Intervention
Active treatment: Tablet containing both L. reuteri strains Placebo: Identical without bacteria Dose: 1 tablet twice daily Duration: 12 weeks Compliance ≥80% required for per-protocol analysis.
Outcomes Primary Outcome
Change in IBS symptom severity (IBS-SSS) from baseline to 12 weeks (intervention vs placebo)
Secondary Outcomes
Proportion achieving ≥50 or ≥100 point IBS-SSS reduction Gastrointestinal symptoms (GSRS-IBS) Pain reduction Quality of life (IBSQOL) Work productivity (WPAI:IBS) Transit time (gut motility) Adverse events Sustainability of effects (3-month follow-up)
Exploratory Outcomes
Stool consistency/frequency Biomarkers (microbiome, immune, metabolomics, etc.) Psychological and lifestyle factors Dietary influences Mechanistic insights into IBS
Study Procedures Visits Screening (2-8 weeks before randomization Consent, questionnaires, biological samples, diaries
Randomization (Day 0) Baseline assessments and start of treatment
During intervention Regular symptom tracking Phone follow-up at week 6
End of treatment (12 weeks) Repeat assessments and samples
Follow-up (3 months later) Long-term outcomes
Optional (Facultative) Assessments Rectal sensitivity (barostat) Sigmoidoscopy ± confocal endomicroscopy MRI (motility and colonic volume)
Measurements
Questionnaires: IBS-SSS, GSRS-IBS, HADS, PHQ-15, IBSQOL, stress, work productivity Biological samples: blood, stool, urine, saliva Gut function: transit time (radiopaque markers and sweetcorn method) Diet: food frequency and recall diaries
Statistical Considerations Sample size: 252 participants (powered to detect clinically meaningful IBS-SSS difference)
Populations:
Intention-to-treat (all randomized) Per-protocol (≥80% compliance, no major deviations) Analysis plan: Defined in a Statistical Analysis Plan No interim analysis
Safety Probiotics considered safe with minimal risk (mainly transient flatulence). Adverse events will be recorded and classified by severity and causality. IBS symptom fluctuations are not counted as adverse events unless worsened.
Ethics & Data Handling Conducted according to Declaration of Helsinki and ICH-GCP. Participants give informed consent and can withdraw anytime. Data are pseudonymized and securely stored (REDCap)
Risk-Benefit Assessment Low risk due to established safety of L. reuteri strains Moderate participant burden (questionnaires, sample collection) Optional procedures may cause discomfort but are controlled and voluntary Potential benefit: improved IBS symptoms and better understanding of disease mechanisms
Key Strengths Large sample size Rigorous randomized controlled design Comprehensive symptom, biological, and mechanistic assessment Long follow-up
Conclusion This study aims to determine whether a novel probiotic combination improves IBS symptoms and to identify biological and clinical predictors of response, contributing to more personalized treatment strategies in IBS.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Adults with IBS who have been randomized to receive the intervention |
|
| Control | Placebo Comparator | Adults with IBS who have been randomized to receive the placebo |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Probiotic Supplementation (Lactobacillus Reuteri) | Other | Probiotic using a new strain derived from L. reuteri. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| IBS symptom severity (IBS-Symptom-Severity-Score) |
| Screening (15-60 days pre-intervention), baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84), 3 month follow up post intervention |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale- IBS (GSRS-IBS) | Change in Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale- IBS (GSRS-IBS) scores over time between arms The GSRS uses a 7- point Likert scale. Total scores can range from 15 - 105 with higher scores indicating worse symptom rating | Screening (15-60 days pre-intervention), baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84), 3 month follow up post intervention |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| ROME V | Changes in stool consistency and frequency measured using the ROME V questionnaire The ROME V is a diagnostic questionnaire for disorders of the gut-brain interaction. Changes in stool consistency and frequency are related to a subset of questions in the Rome V (Q54 - 60). Items are rated on a 10-point Likert scale rated as a percentage of 0 - 100% regarding frequency of symptoms in the last 3 months, including: abdominal pain/ discomfort, how often abdominal pain happened close in time to a bowel movement, how often stools were harder than usual, how often stools were softer than usual, how often stools were more frequent than usual, and how often stools were less frequent than usual. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnus Simren, MD, PhD | Contact | 0046313428107 | magnus.simren@medicine.gu.se | |
| MagTarmlab office | Contact | 0046313428107 | magtarmlab.su@vgregion.se |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Magnus Simren, MD PHD | Göteborg University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mag-tarmlab, Sahlgrenska University Hospital | Recruiting | Gothenburg | 413 45 | Sweden |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D043183 | Irritable Bowel Syndrome |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003109 | Colonic Diseases, Functional |
| D003108 | Colonic Diseases |
| D007410 | Intestinal Diseases |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo Supplementation | Other | A placebo supplement that is identical to the probiotic in formulation and packaging except that the probiotic bacteria is not present. |
|
| General global assessment: satisfactory adequate relief of symptoms from baseline to end of intervention between arms | The proportion of individuals with greater or equal to 50% of assessments with an adequate relief of symptoms | During intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84) |
| General global assessment: worst pain over the last 24 hours, intervention group vs placebo group reduced between baseline and end of intervention between arms | The proportion of individuals with greater or equal to 50% of assessments between baseline and end of intervention, and a greater than or equal to 30% decrease in worst pain during the last 24 hours compared to baseline | During intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84) |
| IBS-quality of life (IBS-QoL) | Change in IBS-quality of life (IBS-QoL) scores over time between arms The IBS-QoL is a 34-item scale that uses a 5-point Likert scale with total scores ranging from 0-100, where higher scores indicate better quality of life | Baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84), 3 month follow up post intervention |
| Work Productivity and Activity Impairment:IBS (WPAI:IBS) | Change in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment:IBS (WPAI:IBS) scores over time between arms The WPAI:IBS consists of 6 items regarding employment status, hours of work missed because of IBS, hours missed because of other reasons, hours actually worked, how much IBS affected productivity of working (VAS of 0 to 10), how much IBS affected regular activities (VAS of 0 to 10). Total scores are expressed as percentage of impairment/productivity lost with higher scores indicating greater impairment | Baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84), 3 month follow up post intervention |
| Change in oro-anal transit time from baseline to end of intervention between groups: Radiopaque markers | Participants will take oral tablets that are radiopaque markers following a specific protocol beginning from 7 days prior to attending the study visit. Each day they will swallow one set of radiopaque markers with water, then on day 7 a nurse will conduct an X-ray of the abdomen to show the location of the markers in the bowel. | Baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84) |
| Change in oro-anal transit time from baseline to end of intervention between groups: sweetcorn | Sweetcorn oro-anal transit time will be measured using a specific protocol. 7 days before attending the study visit the participants will be advised to eat 100g of sweetcorn at 0800 with minimal chewing. Following this, each time they open their bowel for the next 6 days they will be advised to visually inspect the stool for sweetcorn and record whether or not they see the sweetcorn in a diary. | Baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84) |
| Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) | Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores over time between groups. The HADS is a 14-item questionnaire (with 2 subscales: HADS-Depression (7 items) and HADS-Anxiety (7 items), with each item rated on a 4 point Likert scale. Total scores range from 0 - 21. Higher scores indicate worse symptoms for anxiety and depression | Baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84), 3 month follow up post intervention |
| Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) | Change in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) scores over time between groups The PHQ is a 15-item questionnaire with each item rated on a 3-point Likert scale. Total scores range from 0-30 with higher scores indicating greater somatic symptom burden | Baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84), 3 month follow up post intervention |
| Baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84), 3 month follow up post intervention |
| Validation of the measurement of oro-anal transit time using sweetcorn vs radiopaque markers | Baseline to end of intervention (12 weeks) |
| Fecal samples | Fecal samples will be analysed in relation to factors regarding predictors of IBS symptoms and response to intervention (including gut microbiome and fecal metabolites) | Baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84), 3 month follow up post intervention |
| Urine samples | Urine samples will be analysed in relation to factors regarding predictors of IBS symptoms (including urinary metabolites) | Baseline (day 0 of intervention) |
| Saliva samples | Saliva samples will be analysed in relation to factors regarding predictors of IBS symptoms (including salivary protease) | Baseline (day 0 of intervention) |
| Dietary intake - 3 day diet diaries | Dietary intake will be recorded prior to and throughout the study period in seven 3-day diet diaries and analysed in relation to predictors of IBS symptoms and response to intervention | Screening (15-60 days pre-intervention), baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84), 3 month follow up post intervention |
| Rectal sensitivity barostat | This is an opt-in outcome for participants to ascertain rectal sensitivity in relation to IBS symptom predictors. A balloon is inserted and inflated in the rectum in a controlled setting. The patient indicates when defined sensory thresholds are reached (first feeling of the balloon, urge to empty bowel, discomfort or pain). When the patient indicates discomfort or pain, or another reason to stop, the balloon inflation will be stopped. | After screening, but pre-randomization (60 - 15 days pre-randomization) |
| Rectal sensitivity with Physical Reactions to Emotions Scale (PRES) | This is an opt-in outcome for participants to ascertain rectal sensitivity in relation to IBS symptom predictors Alongside the rectal barostat, participants will complete the PRES, a 9-item questionnaire measured on a 4-item Likert scale. Total scores can range from 0 = 27 with higher scores indicating more frequent physical reactions to the rectal barostat | After screening, but pre-randomization (60 - 15 days pre-randomization) |
| Unprepared sigmoidoscopy (+ biopsy and blood serum to measure permeability) with confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) | This is an opt-in outcome for participants to ascertain gut permeability in relation to IBS symptom predictors | After screening, but pre-randomization (60 - 15 days pre-randomization) |
| MRI colon to measure colonic gas volumes | This is an opt-in outcome for participants to ascertain colonic gas volumes in relation to IBS symptom predictors | After screening, but pre-randomization (60 - 15 days pre-randomization) |
| Small bowel motility MRI | This is an opt-in outcome for participants to ascertain small bowel motility in relation to IBS symptom predictors | After screening, but pre-randomization (60 - 15 days pre-randomization) |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |