Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to compare the prone row exercise, and the lateral pull down exercise, in individuals diagnosed with shoulder impingement syndrome and scapular dyskinesia regarding latissimus dorsi strength, middle trapezius strength, lower trapezius strength, rhomboids strength, Visual analog scale score, Shoulder pain and disability index score and scapular stability test values.
Shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS) is a common musculoskeletal disorder, accounting for approximately 44-65% of all shoulder pain complaints. Normal scapular stability includes the ability to keep the scapula's normal position while the arms are at your sides and throughout all upper-limb movements . The upper, middle, and lower trapezius muscles couple with the serratus anterior and rhomboid muscles to form "force couples," which are thought to be important for appropriate scapular orientation.
Scapular dyskinesis occurs when the scapular stabilizing muscles (upper, middle, and lower trapezius, serratus anterior, and latissimus dorsi) are unable to preserve typical scapular movement, and is considered potentially harmful when it results in increased anterior tilting, downward rotation, and protraction, all of which reorient the acromion to reduce the subacromial space width.
Bilateral prone rowing has demonstrated clear clinical benefits for patients with subacromial impingement syndrome. In a four week, supervised program where 16 individuals with stage II SIS performed low rowing three times per week, The Lateral Pull down exercise is widely recognized for its activation of the latissimus dorsi, but it also significantly recruits scapular stabilizers such as the lower trapezius and rhomboids, especially when performed with proper scapular depression and retraction. This makes it an effective exercise for improving scapular muscle strength and control in both healthy individuals and those undergoing shoulder rehabilitation .
Fifty-four male and female patients, with age between 40-65 years (mean age of 52.5 ± 6.25 years) (Yilmaz et al., 2023), will be recruited through direct referrals from orthopedic doctors. They will be asked to sign the informed consent form.
The study will employ a two experimental group protocol. Each group will follow a distinct exercise intervention. Group A will perform the prone row exercise, while Group B will engage in the lateral pull-down exercise. Both groups will also receive selected physical therapy treatment, which includes stretches to pectoralis minor, Posterior soft tissue. Codman's exercise, scapular sets and Wall slides and Postural exercises like thoracic extensions, Chin tuck and Scapular retraction exercises . The intervention period will last for 6 weeks, with sessions conducted three times per week under physiotherapist supervision.
Outcome measures:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group A: Prone Row exercise and selected physical therapy program group | Experimental | Prone rowing and selected physical therapy treatment, which includes stretches to pectoralis minor, Posterior soft tissue. Codman's exercise, scapular sets and Wall slides and Postural exercises like thoracic extensions, Chin tuck and Scapular retraction exercises (Dabholkar & Yardi 2015). |
|
| Group B:the Lateral Pull Down exercise and selected physical therapy program received by Group A | Experimental | Lateral Pull Down exercise and selected physical therapy treatment, which includes stretches to pectoralis minor, Posterior soft tissue. Codman's exercise, scapular sets and Wall slides and Postural exercises like thoracic extensions, Chin tuck and Scapular retraction exercises |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A will perform the prone row exercise and selected physical therapy treatment | Procedure | prone row exercise: freely off the side and the head in a neutral position, supported if needed. The starting position involves 90-degree shoulder flexion with full elbow extension (0-degree elbow flexion), transitioning into 0-degree shoulder flexion with 90-degree elbow flexion. From this position, a bilateral vertical pulling movement is performed, involving scapular retraction and shoulder extension against resistance. The motion ends with the elbow flexed at 90 degrees, the shoulder extended, and the scapula fully retracted towards the spine, with control throughout the movement. selected physical therapy treatment, which includes stretches to pectoralis minor, Posterior soft tissue. Codman's exercise, scapular sets and Wall slides and Postural exercises like thoracic extensions, Chin tuck and Scapular retraction exercises |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Lateral scapular slide test | Lateral Scapular Slide Test (LSST), defined as a side-to-side scapular difference of 1.5 cm or more in any of the three arm positions, indicating scapular asymmetry associated with dyskinesis (Odom, 2001; Kibler, 1998). | (pre-intervention) and after 6 weeks (post-intervention) |
| Isometric muscle strength testing of latissimus dorsi, middle trapezius, lower trapezius and rhomboids muscles using Handheld dynamometer (HHD) | Lafayette HHD revealed mostly good to excellent reliability (coefficients ≥ 0.70) for all LL muscles measurements. Also, it has good validity for most measures of isometric LL strength and power in healthy population. Lafayette HHD is a reliable instrument to measure the foot and ankle strength of young and older adults, for both intra-rater (ICC (3,1) = 0.78-0.94) and interrater (ICC (3,1) = 0.77-0.88) comparisons. (Celik et al., 2012). | (pre-intervention) and after 6 weeks (post-intervention) |
| Pain using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) | The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) will be used to measure pain. The VAS is a straight line, with one end representing 0 (no pain) and the other end representing 10 (worst pain possible). The number 0 indicates no problem, and 10 represents the worst possible condition (Huskisson, 1974). | (pre-intervention) and after 6 weeks (post-intervention) |
| Function using SPADI | Shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) is demonstrated to be a validated and reliable measure of shoulder pain and disability (Roach et al., 1991). The translated version of SPADI in the Arabic language showed excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability and construct validity based on substantial correlations of Arabic SPADI with Quick DASH, NRS, and active shoulder ROM. SPADI is recommended for the evaluation of patients with shoulder dysfunction (Alsanawi et al.,2015) | (pre-intervention) and after 6 weeks (post-intervention) |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| mennatallah maher, MSc | Contact | 0201096430623 | mennaallah.maher@cu.edu.eg |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University | Cairo | Egypt |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37694348 | Background | Yilmaz Gokmen G, Akcay B, Kecelioglu S, Ozen MS, Yuce H. Physical and well-being effect of scapular kinesio taping combined with conventional physiotherapy in shoulder impingement syndrome: A randomized controlled study. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2023;36(6):1375-1383. doi: 10.3233/BMR-220396. | |
| Background | Ronai, P. (2017). The barbell row exercise. ACSM's Health & Fitness Journal, 21(2), 25-28. | ||
| 11188601 |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Related Info | View source |
Not provided
sensitive patient data.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study will employ a two experimental group protocol. Participants will be randomly allocated into two groups using the lottery method. Folded papers labeled with group codes will be placed in a container and picked at random by an independent person. This simple randomization ensures equal allocation probability and minimizes selection bias.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Group B will receive selected physical therapy treatment and Lateral pull down exercise. | Procedure | The patient is seated on the pulldown machine with an upright trunk and feet flat on the floor, maintaining a stable posture. The starting position includes gripping the straight bar with a wide overhand (pronated) grip, marked to ensure a between-hands distance equal to 1.6 times the biacromial distance which is the horizontal distance between the most lateral points of the right and left acromion processes (shoulder tip). From this position, the participant performs a downward pulling movement, bringing the bar down in front of the face toward the upper chest near the clavicle in a smooth and controlled manner. selected physical therapy treatment, which includes stretches to pectoralis minor, Posterior soft tissue. Codman's exercise, scapular sets and Wall slides and Postural exercises like thoracic extensions, Chin tuck and Scapular retraction exercises |
|
| Background |
| Roach KE, Budiman-Mak E, Songsiridej N, Lertratanakul Y. Development of a shoulder pain and disability index. Arthritis Care Res. 1991 Dec;4(4):143-9. |
| Background | Obikili, E. N. (2006). Biacromial and Biiliac Diameters in a Young Adult Southeastern Nigerian Population. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Anatomy, 5(1), 22-25. |
| 11235656 | Background | Odom CJ, Taylor AB, Hurd CE, Denegar CR. Measurement of scapular asymetry and assessment of shoulder dysfunction using the Lateral Scapular Slide Test: a reliability and validity study. Phys Ther. 2001 Feb;81(2):799-809. doi: 10.1093/ptj/81.2.799. |
| 24055533 | Background | Noguchi M, Chopp JN, Borgs SP, Dickerson CR. Scapular orientation following repetitive prone rowing: implications for potential subacromial impingement mechanisms. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2013 Dec;23(6):1356-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2013.08.007. Epub 2013 Aug 31. |
| 15330696 | Background | McClure PW, Bialker J, Neff N, Williams G, Karduna A. Shoulder function and 3-dimensional kinematics in people with shoulder impingement syndrome before and after a 6-week exercise program. Phys Ther. 2004 Sep;84(9):832-48. |
| 15228624 | Background | Lehman GJ, Buchan DD, Lundy A, Myers N, Nalborczyk A. Variations in muscle activation levels during traditional latissimus dorsi weight training exercises: An experimental study. Dyn Med. 2004 Jun 30;3(1):4. doi: 10.1186/1476-5918-3-4. |
| 9548131 | Background | Kibler WB. The role of the scapula in athletic shoulder function. Am J Sports Med. 1998 Mar-Apr;26(2):325-37. doi: 10.1177/03635465980260022801. |
| 4139420 | Background | Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet. 1974 Nov 9;2(7889):1127-31. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)90884-8. No abstract available. |
| 21889362 | Background | Helgadottir H, Kristjansson E, Einarsson E, Karduna A, Jonsson H Jr. Altered activity of the serratus anterior during unilateral arm elevation in patients with cervical disorders. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2011 Dec;21(6):947-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2011.07.007. Epub 2011 Sep 1. |
| 40513198 | Background | Fischer J, Burger C, Seguel JM, Rodoplu C, Paternoster FK, Tilp M, Konrad A. Impact of different ranges of motion in the prone barbell row on muscle excitation. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2025 Aug;83:103025. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2025.103025. Epub 2025 Jun 9. |
| Background | Dabholkar Ajit, S., & Yardi Sujata, S. (2015). Effects of scapular muscle strengthening on shoulder function and disability in shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS)-A randomized controlled trial |
| Background | Cools, A. M., Dewitte, V., Lanszweert, F., Notebaert, D., Roets, A., Soetens, B., & Witvrouw, E. (2007). Scapular muscle rehabilitation exercises in overhead athletes with impingement symptoms: Effect of a 6-week training program on scapular muscle recruitment and functional outcome. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 41(11), 818-824 |
| 22495260 | Background | Celik D, Dirican A, Baltaci G. Intrarater reliability of assessing strength of the shoulder and scapular muscles. J Sport Rehabil. 2012 Feb 29;21(1):1-5. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2012.TR3. Print 2012 Feb 1. |
| 25954858 | Background | Alsanawi HA, Alghadir A, Anwer S, Roach KE, Alawaji A. Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of an Arabic version of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index. Int J Rehabil Res. 2015 Sep;38(3):270-5. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000118. |
| 21849731 | Result | Baskurt Z, Baskurt F, Gelecek N, Ozkan MH. The effectiveness of scapular stabilization exercise in the patients with subacromial impingement syndrome. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2011;24(3):173-9. doi: 10.3233/BMR-2011-0291. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019534 | Shoulder Impingement Syndrome |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D000070599 | Shoulder Injuries |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided