Clinical Performance of a Self-Cure Composite System Versus a Highly Filled Flowable Composite System in Carious Cervical Lesions: A Randomized 18 Months Clinical Trial
Clinical Performance of a Self-Cure Composite System Versus a Highly Filled Flowable Composite System in Carious Cervical Lesions: A Randomized 18 Months Clinical Trial
The aim of the study is to compare and evaluate the clinical performance of a self cure composite system versus a highly filled flowable composite in the restoration of carious cervical lesions over an 18 months follow up period.
Examination and selection of patients will be done according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. A class V cavity will be prepared after local anesthesia has been given. Followed by the placement of the restorative material according to the randomization sequence.
For the intervention: the primer will be applied first followed by filling of the cavity using self cure composite (Stella Automix or Stela Capsule, SDI Ltd, Australia). For the control group: etching of the cavity (Kulzer Gluma Etch, Kulzer GmbH, Germany) will be done followed by rinsing, drying, applying the bonding agent (Solobond M, Voco GmbH, Germany), curing, and lastly, applying the highly filled flowable composite (Polofil NHT flow, Voco Gmbh, Germany) and curing.
Patient-related Criteria:
A) Inclusion Criteria:
B) Exclusion Criteria:
Tooth-related Criteria:
A) Inclusion Criteria:
B) Exclusion Criteria:
abdelrahmanh.hamza@dentistry.cu.edu.eg+20 1063330630