Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Link Campus University | OTHER |
| Universita degli Studi di Genova | OTHER |
| Saint Camillus International University of Health Sciences | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This prospective controlled clinical pilot study will compare the effectiveness of two different grafting strategies for horizontal bone regeneration in healed post-extraction sites with buccal bone deficiency, using a collagenated porcine cortical bone lamina as a barrier membrane.
A total of 21 patients requiring implant-supported rehabilitation associated with bone regeneration will be enrolled, for a total of 40 implants. In the test group, bone defects will be grafted using a collagenated cortico-cancellous sticky xenograft, while in the control group a mixture of hydroxyapatite-based xenograft and autologous bone in a 1:1 ratio will be used. In both groups, a semi-rigid collagenated cortical bone lamina will be applied and stabilized to contain the graft material and maintain space for regeneration.
The primary objective of the study will be to evaluate volumetric bone changes over time using cone-beam computed tomography imaging, comparing baseline and follow-up scans. Secondary outcomes will include linear measurements of bone gain at different levels around the implant site.
The study will investigate whether collagenated xenografts alone can provide comparable clinical and radiographic outcomes to combined grafting approaches including autologous bone, while potentially reducing patient morbidity associated with bone harvesting.
Severe alveolar ridge resorption following tooth extraction may result in insufficient bone width and compromised anatomical conditions for implant placement, particularly in sites with buccal cortical plate deficiency. In such cases, guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedures will be required to restore adequate bone volume and allow for prosthetically driven implant rehabilitation.
A wide range of grafting materials will be used in clinical practice for bone regeneration, including autologous bone, allogeneic and xenogeneic biomaterials, as well as synthetic substitutes. Among these, xenogeneic collagenated grafts will be increasingly adopted due to their favorable biological properties, including clot stabilization, facilitation of early cellular infiltration, and promotion of angiogenesis. However, their relatively rapid remodeling rate may influence the final volumetric stability of the regenerated bone.
Barrier membranes will play a crucial role in GBR procedures by preventing soft tissue invasion and maintaining space for bone regeneration. Recently, collagenated porcine cortical bone laminae will be introduced as semi-rigid membranes combining the advantages of mechanical stability and biocompatibility. When properly stabilized, these devices will act as containment structures for graft materials, potentially improving regenerative outcomes.
The present study will be designed as a prospective controlled clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness of two different grafting strategies for horizontal bone regeneration in healed post-extraction sites presenting buccal bone deficiency. Patients requiring implant-supported rehabilitation associated with bone augmentation procedures will be consecutively enrolled and allocated to one of two treatment groups.
In the test group, bone defects will be grafted using a collagenated cortico-cancellous sticky xenograft. In the control group, a mixture of hydroxyapatite-based xenograft and autologous bone in a 1:1 ratio will be used. In both groups, a collagenated porcine cortical bone lamina will be applied as a barrier membrane and stabilized using fixation pins to ensure space maintenance and graft containment.
All surgical procedures will be performed under local anesthesia by an experienced operator following standardized clinical protocols. After implant placement and grafting, primary wound closure will be achieved, and patients will receive appropriate postoperative care, including antibiotics and analgesics as indicated. Sutures will be removed after a healing period of approximately 10-14 days.
Radiographic evaluation will be performed using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans acquired before surgery (baseline) and at follow-up. Digital datasets will be analyzed using dedicated three-dimensional software to assess volumetric changes in the regenerated bone. Linear measurements will also be obtained at predefined reference levels around the implant site, including the implant neck, 3 mm apically, and at the implant apex.
Implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation will be completed after a healing period of approximately six months, following confirmation of implant osseointegration.
The primary outcome of the study will be the volumetric change of regenerated bone over time. Secondary outcomes will include linear bone gain at different levels and the influence of clinical and anatomical variables such as patient age, sex, and implant site localization.
Statistical analysis will be performed at the implant level. Continuous variables will be assessed for normality and compared between groups using appropriate parametric or non-parametric tests. Multivariable regression models will be applied to evaluate the association between treatment group and outcomes while adjusting for potential confounding variables.
This study will aim to determine whether collagenated xenografts alone will provide comparable regenerative outcomes to combined approaches including autologous bone, potentially reducing surgical invasiveness and donor-site morbidity while maintaining adequate bone volume for implant-supported rehabilitation.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Collagenated Xenograft + Cortical Lamina | Experimental | Participants in this arm will undergo horizontal bone regeneration using a collagenated cortico-cancellous xenogeneic graft material. The graft will be placed in healed post-extraction sites presenting buccal bone deficiency. A collagenated porcine cortical bone lamina will be used as a semi-rigid barrier membrane and stabilized with fixation pins to contain the graft and maintain space for bone regeneration. Implant placement will be performed in conjunction with the regenerative procedure. |
|
| Hydroxyapatite Xenograft + Autologous Bone + Cortical Lamina | Active Comparator | Participants in this arm will undergo horizontal bone regeneration using a mixture of hydroxyapatite-based xenogeneic graft material and autologous bone in a 1:1 ratio. The graft will be placed in healed post-extraction sites with buccal bone deficiency. A collagenated porcine cortical bone lamina will be used as a semi-rigid barrier membrane and stabilized with fixation pins to ensure graft containment and space maintenance. Implant placement will be performed in conjunction with the regenerative procedure. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guided Bone Regeneration with Implant Placement | Procedure | Participants will undergo implant placement combined with guided bone regeneration in healed post-extraction sites with buccal bone deficiency. The surgical procedure will include defect debridement, graft placement, and stabilization using a collagenated porcine cortical bone lamina as a semi-rigid barrier membrane fixed with pins. Primary closure will be achieved, and postoperative care will follow standard clinical protocols. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Volumetric Bone Change | Change in regenerated bone volume will be assessed using cone-beam computed tomography scans acquired at baseline and follow-up. DICOM datasets will be superimposed and analyzed with dedicated three-dimensional software. Regenerated bone volume will be expressed in cubic millimeters. | Baseline to 24-36 months after surgery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Linear Bone Gain at Implant Neck | Horizontal linear bone gain will be measured on cone-beam computed tomography scans at the implant neck level. | Baseline to 24-36 months after surgery |
| Linear Bone Gain 3 mm Apical to Implant Neck |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Università di Cagliari | Cagliari | Cagliari | 09125 | Italy |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 36345818 | Background | Couso-Queiruga E, Weber HA, Garaicoa-Pazmino C, Barwacz C, Kalleme M, Galindo-Moreno P, Avila-Ortiz G. Influence of healing time on the outcomes of alveolar ridge preservation using a collagenated bovine bone xenograft: A randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2023 Feb;50(2):132-146. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13744. Epub 2022 Nov 18. | |
| 28508515 |
Not provided
Not provided
De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in this study will be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author, following publication of the study results. Data sharing will be subject to institutional policies and applicable regulations to ensure patient confidentiality and data protection.
Data will be available beginning 6 months following publication of the primary results and will remain available for up to 5 years.
Access to de-identified individual participant data and supporting documents will be granted to researchers who provide a methodologically sound research proposal. Requests will be reviewed by the study investigators. Data will be shared after approval of a data access agreement and in compliance with institutional policies and applicable data protection regulations. Data will be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016301 | Alveolar Bone Loss |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001862 | Bone Resorption |
| D001847 | Bone Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D055093 | Periodontal Atrophy |
Not provided
Not provided
Participants will be allocated to one of two parallel groups based on the chronological order of enrollment. The test group will receive bone regeneration using a collagenated cortico-cancellous sticky xenograft, while the control group will receive a mixture of hydroxyapatite-based xenograft and autologous bone in a 1:1 ratio. In both groups, a collagenated porcine cortical bone lamina will be used as a barrier membrane. The study will compare radiographic and clinical outcomes between the two groups.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Collagenated Xenogeneic Bone Graft | Procedure | A collagenated cortico-cancellous xenogeneic bone graft material will be used to fill the bone defect during guided bone regeneration procedures. The material will be applied to promote early vascularization and cellular infiltration, supporting bone regeneration while undergoing physiological remodeling over time. |
|
| Hydroxyapatite Xenograft with Autologous Bone | Procedure | A mixture of hydroxyapatite-based xenogeneic bone graft and autologous bone in a 1:1 ratio will be used to fill the bone defect during guided bone regeneration procedures. The autologous component will provide osteogenic and osteoinductive potential, while the xenograft will contribute to long-term volume stability. |
|
Horizontal linear bone gain will be measured on cone-beam computed tomography scans at 3 mm apical to the implant neck.
| Baseline to 24-36 months after surgery |
| Linear Bone Gain at Implant Apex | Horizontal linear bone gain will be measured on cone-beam computed tomography scans at the implant apex level. | Baseline to 24-36 months after surgery |
| Barone A, Toti P, Menchini-Fabris GB, Derchi G, Marconcini S, Covani U. Extra oral digital scanning and imaging superimposition for volume analysis of bone remodeling after tooth extraction with and without 2 types of particulate porcine mineral insertion: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Aug;19(4):750-759. doi: 10.1111/cid.12495. Epub 2017 May 16. |
| 37752820 | Background | Calciolari E, Corbella S, Gkranias N, Vigano M, Sculean A, Donos N. Efficacy of biomaterials for lateral bone augmentation performed with guided bone regeneration. A network meta-analysis. Periodontol 2000. 2023 Oct;93(1):77-106. doi: 10.1111/prd.12531. Epub 2023 Sep 27. |
| 23574469 | Background | Susin C, Wikesjo UM. Regenerative periodontal therapy: 30 years of lessons learned and unlearned. Periodontol 2000. 2013 Jun;62(1):232-42. doi: 10.1111/prd.12003. |
| D010510 |
| Periodontal Diseases |
| D009059 | Mouth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |