Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026042-1 | Other Identifier | Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Background:
Sinonasal adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is a rare type of cancer that starts in the nasal cavity or sinuses. Although surgery can remove the tumor, doctors often recommend radiation therapy after surgery to reduce the chance of the cancer coming back. However, radiation can cause long-term side effects such as bone damage, dry mouth, or difficulty opening the mouth. For patients whose tumor has been completely removed (called R0 resection) and who have early-stage disease (T1-T3) without spread to lymph nodes or other organs, it is not clear whether routine radiation therapy is always needed.
Study Objective:
This study aims to find out whether simply watching and waiting (surgery alone) is not worse than adding radiation therapy (surgery plus radiation) in terms of keeping patients free from cancer for at least 3 years. If surgery alone is shown to be as good as surgery plus radiation, some patients may be able to avoid the side effects of radiation.
Study Design:
This is a prospective, multicenter, real-world study. It is not a randomized trial - patients and their doctors will decide together whether to have radiation after surgery. We will follow about 200 patients from many hospitals across China. About half will receive surgery alone, and the other half will receive surgery followed by radiation therapy. All patients will be followed for at least 3 years.
Hypothesis:
We hypothesize that surgery alone is not inferior to surgery plus radiation therapy for 3-year disease-free survival, with a non-inferiority margin of a hazard ratio of 1.35. In other words, even if surgery alone has a slightly higher risk of cancer returning, the difference is small enough that avoiding radiation side effects may still be worthwhile.
Main Outcome:
The main outcome is the percentage of patients who are alive and free from cancer recurrence (local, regional, or distant) or death from any cause at 3 years after treatment.
Potential Impact:
If our hypothesis is confirmed, this study could change current practice. Many patients with completely resected, early-stage sinonasal ACC might safely avoid postoperative radiation and its long-term side effects, improving their quality of life without compromising cancer control.
Study Design Overview
This is a prospective, multicenter, observational real-world study conducted at approximately 16 hospitals across China. Patients with completely resected (R0), T1-T3, N0M0 sinonasal adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) are enrolled after surgery. The study does not randomize patients; instead, treatment assignment (postoperative radiotherapy vs. observation alone) is determined by shared decision-making between the patient and the attending physician, reflecting routine clinical practice.
Treatment Groups
Radiotherapy group: Patients receive intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) at a dose of 60-66 Gy to the high-risk clinical target volume (CTV1) and 54-60 Gy to the low-risk CTV2, starting within 4-6 weeks after surgery.
Observation group: Patients undergo regular follow-up without postoperative radiotherapy.
All patients receive the same standardized follow-up schedule and supportive care.
Sample Size and Power
A total of 200 patients (approximately 100 per group) are planned. Based on historical data from the lead center (3-year disease-free survival [DFS] of 70% in the radiotherapy group vs. 62% in the observation group, corresponding to a hazard ratio [HR] of 1.35), with a two-sided alpha of 0.05 and power of 80%, this sample size is expected to yield approximately 80-90 DFS events over the 3-year follow-up period.
Statistical Methods
Primary analysis: The non-inferiority of observation versus radiotherapy for 3-year DFS will be assessed using a Cox proportional hazards model with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on propensity scores. The non-inferiority margin is set at HR = 1.35 (upper bound of the 95% confidence interval must be <1.35).
Propensity score model: Includes age, sex, T stage (T1/T2 vs. T3), tumor site, histologic subtype (cribriform/tubular proportion), perineural invasion, margin distance, Ki-67 index, ECOG performance status, and comorbidities.
Sensitivity analyses: Multivariable Cox regression, propensity score matching (1:1, caliper 0.2), instrumental variable analysis (using center preference as the instrument), and E-value analysis will be performed.
Secondary endpoints: Overall survival (1, 3, 5 years), 1-year and 5-year DFS, local control rate, distant metastasis rate, quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35), and treatment-related toxicity (CTCAE v5.0) will be compared between groups using appropriate methods (Kaplan-Meier, log-rank test, or competing risk models).
Data Collection and Follow-up
Baseline data: Demographics, clinical and pathologic characteristics, surgical details.
Follow-up visits: Every 4 months for the first 2 years, every 6 months for years 3-5, and annually thereafter. Each visit includes physical examination, laboratory tests, and toxicity assessment.
Imaging: Contrast-enhanced MRI every 6 months for the first 3 years and annually for years 4-5 (or whenever clinically indicated). Chest CT annually.
All suspected recurrences are centrally reviewed by a blinded independent central review (BICR) committee using RECIST 1.1 criteria.
Quality Control and Data Monitoring
An independent Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) comprising clinical experts, biostatisticians, and ethicists will review safety data (serious adverse events) every 6 months and overall data quality annually.
Central pathology review confirms the diagnosis and histologic subtype for all enrolled patients.
Electronic data capture (EDC) with source data verification (SDV) will be used. Ethics and Dissemination
The study protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University (approval number: 2026042-1). All participating centers will obtain local ethics approval. Written informed consent will be obtained from all patients. Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals regardless of the outcome.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Surgery plus Postoperative Radiotherapy Group | Surgery plus Postoperative Radiotherapy:Participants in this group undergo radical surgical resection of the tumor (R0 resection) followed by postoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) at a dose of 60-66 Gy to the high-risk clinical target volume (CTV1) and 54-60 Gy to the low-risk CTV2. Radiotherapy is initiated within 4-6 weeks after surgery. |
| |
| Surgery Alone (Observation) Group | No postoperative radiotherapy or any other form of adjuvant radiation. Patients undergo regular follow-up according to the study protocol, including physical examination, laboratory tests, and imaging (contrast-enhanced MRI of the head and neck every 6 months for the first 3 years and annually thereafter; chest CT annually). Active surveillance is performed to detect any recurrence or metastasis. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Postoperative Radiotherapy | Radiation | Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivered to the postoperative tumor bed. High-risk clinical target volume (CTV1) receives 60-66 Gy in 30-33 fractions (1.8-2.0 Gy per fraction). Low-risk clinical target volume (CTV2) receives 54-60 Gy in 30-33 fractions. Treatment starts within 4-6 weeks after surgery. Daily image guidance is used. Organs at risk are constrained according to QUANTEC/RTOG guidelines |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| 3-year Disease-Free Survival (DFS) | DFS is defined as the time from enrollment to the first occurrence of any of the following events: local recurrence, regional recurrence (cervical lymph nodes), distant metastasis, or death from any cause. Patients alive and free from recurrence are censored at the last disease-free assessment. All suspected recurrences are centrally reviewed by a blinded independent central review (BICR) committee using RECIST 1.1 criteria. | From enrollment up to 3 years post-treatment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Survival (OS) | OS is defined as the time from enrollment to death from any cause. Patients alive at the end of follow-up are censored at the last known alive date. | 1, 3, and 5 years after treatment |
| Disease-Free Survival |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Age ≥18 years and ≤75 years.
Histologically confirmed adenoid cystic carcinoma of cribriform or tubular type (solid type excluded) by central pathology review.
Completed radical surgical resection with postoperative pathology confirming R0 resection (negative microscopic margins).
Tumor stage T1, T2, or T3 according to AJCC 8th edition, with N0 and M0 status.
Tumor originating from the nasal cavity or paranasal sinuses (excluding primary salivary gland tumors metastatic to this region).
ECOG performance status 0 or 1.
Adequate bone marrow, liver, and kidney function within 14 days before enrollment:
Willing and able to provide written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Adult patients (age 18-75 years) with histologically confirmed cribriform or tubular type sinonasal adenoid cystic carcinoma, who have undergone R0 surgical resection and have disease staged as T1-T3, N0, M0 per AJCC 8th edition. Participants are recruited from the Department of Otolaryngology of approximately 16 tertiary hospitals across China, including the lead center (Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University) and collaborating centers. Consecutive patients meeting eligibility criteria are invited to enroll after providing written informed consent. Treatment assignment (postoperative radiotherapy vs. observation alone) is determined by shared decision-making between the patient and the attending physician, reflecting routine clinical practice.
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quan Liu, MD | Contact | +86 15001959681 | liuqent@163.com | |
| Wanpeng Li, MD | Contact | +86 13262856870 | 18879117831@163.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University | Shanghai | China |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31683896 | Background | Akbaba S, Ahmed D, Mock A, Held T, Bahadir S, Lang K, Syed M, Hoerner-Rieber J, Forster T, Federspil P, Herfarth K, Plinkert P, Debus J, Adeberg S. Treatment Outcome of 227 Patients with Sinonasal Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma (ACC) after Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy and Active Raster-Scanning Carbon Ion Boost: A 10-Year Single-Center Experience. Cancers (Basel). 2019 Nov 1;11(11):1705. doi: 10.3390/cancers11111705. | |
| 31194275 |
Not provided
Not provided
Individual participant data will not be shared because this is an investigator-initiated, multicenter observational real-world study. The informed consent form does not include provisions for data sharing beyond the primary research team and participating centers. Data access requests may be considered by the principal investigator upon reasonable request, but no public repository deposit is planned.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003528 | Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000230 | Adenocarcinoma |
| D002277 | Carcinoma |
| D009375 | Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019370 | Observation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008722 | Methods |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Sample tissues
|
| Observation | Other | No postoperative radiotherapy or any other form of adjuvant radiation. Patients undergo regular follow-up according to the study protocol, including physical examination, laboratory tests, and imaging (contrast-enhanced MRI of the head and neck every 6 months for the first 3 years and annually thereafter; chest CT annually). Active surveillance is performed to detect any recurrence or metastasis |
|
DFS is defined as the time from enrollment to first occurrence of local recurrence, regional recurrence, distant metastasis, or death from any cause. Patients alive and free from recurrence are censored at the last disease-free assessment. Same definition as primary outcome but assessed at 1-year and 5-year time points.
| 1, and 5 years after treatment |
| Local Control Rate (LCR) | LCR is defined as the proportion of patients without local recurrence (at the primary tumor site) after treatment. Local recurrence is confirmed by imaging (contrast-enhanced MRI) and/or biopsy, centrally reviewed by blinded independent central review (BICR) using RECIST 1.1 criteria. | From enrollment up to 5 years |
| EORTC QLQ-C30 | QoL is assessed using the Chinese versions of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (core questionnaire). Scores are calculated according to EORTC scoring manuals. Higher scores represent better functioning or worse symptoms depending on the domain. | Baseline, and at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after treatment |
| QLQ-H&N35 | QoL is assessed using the Chinese versions of the QLQ-H&N35 (head and neck module). Scores are calculated according to EORTC scoring manuals. Higher scores represent better functioning or worse symptoms depending on the domain. | Baseline, and at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after treatment |
| Treatment-Related Toxicity | Toxicity is graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. Acute toxicity (occurring ≤90 days from start of radiotherapy or from surgery in the observation group) and late toxicity (occurring >90 days) are recorded separately. Specific toxicities include radiation-induced osteoradionecrosis, xerostomia, trismus, pituitary dysfunction, and second primary malignancies. | From start of treatment up to 5 years |
| Background |
| Kashiwazaki R, Turner MT, Geltzeiler M, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Gardner PA, Snyderman CH, Wang EW. The endoscopic endonasal approach for sinonasal and nasopharyngeal adenoid cystic carcinoma. Laryngoscope. 2020 Jun;130(6):1414-1421. doi: 10.1002/lary.28100. Epub 2019 Jun 13. |
| 37100752 | Background | Wei W, Liu JQ, Qi Y, Li XM, Meng FY, Ren QZ, Yan B, Wang ZL, Zhang QH. [Analysis of the efficacy of endoscopic transnasal surgery for sinonasal and skull base adenoid cystic carcinoma]. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 May 7;58(5):438-444. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20221107-00666. Chinese. |
| 24080140 | Background | Seong SY, Hyun DW, Kim YS, Cho HJ, Lee JG, Yoon JH, Kim CH. Treatment outcomes of sinonasal adenoid cystic carcinoma: 30 cases from a single institution. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Jul;42(5):e171-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.08.002. Epub 2013 Sep 9. |
| 17960615 | Background | Lupinetti AD, Roberts DB, Williams MD, Kupferman ME, Rosenthal DI, Demonte F, El-Naggar A, Weber RS, Hanna EY. Sinonasal adenoid cystic carcinoma: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Cancer. 2007 Dec 15;110(12):2726-31. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23096. |
| 25456010 | Background | van Weert S, van der Waal I, Witte BI, Leemans CR, Bloemena E. Histopathological grading of adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck: analysis of currently used grading systems and proposal for a simplified grading scheme. Oral Oncol. 2015 Jan;51(1):71-6. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2014.10.007. Epub 2014 Oct 28. |
| 32629365 | Background | Cavalieri S, Mariani L, Vander Poorten V, Van Breda L, Cau MC, Lo Vullo S, Alfieri S, Resteghini C, Bergamini C, Orlandi E, Calareso G, Clement P, Hauben E, Platini F, Bossi P, Licitra L, Locati LD. Prognostic nomogram in patients with metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma of the salivary glands. Eur J Cancer. 2020 Sep;136:35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.05.013. Epub 2020 Jul 3. |
| 21612974 | Background | Bjorndal K, Krogdahl A, Therkildsen MH, Overgaard J, Johansen J, Kristensen CA, Homoe P, Sorensen CH, Andersen E, Bundgaard T, Primdahl H, Lambertsen K, Andersen LJ, Godballe C. Salivary gland carcinoma in Denmark 1990-2005: a national study of incidence, site and histology. Results of the Danish Head and Neck Cancer Group (DAHANCA). Oral Oncol. 2011 Jul;47(7):677-82. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2011.04.020. Epub 2011 May 25. |
| 16757203 | Result | Dodd RL, Slevin NJ. Salivary gland adenoid cystic carcinoma: a review of chemotherapy and molecular therapies. Oral Oncol. 2006 Sep;42(8):759-69. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2006.01.001. Epub 2006 Jun 6. |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |