Implementation of an Accessible Healthcare Model (ACHD STRONG): Comparing Nurse and Physician Lead Healthcare Transition Education in a RE-AIM Framework
Implementation of an Accessible Healthcare Model (ACHD STRONG): Comparing Nurse and Physician Lead Healthcare Transition Education in a RE-AIM Framework
The study includes patients with congenital heart disease (CHD), as well as their support persons and their providers, who are preparing to make the transition from pediatric to adult care for their CHD. The purpose of this study is to improve the tools available to help find doctors as patients enter adulthood. 200 people with CHD and support people will be enrolled.
While people born with congenital heart disease (CHD) are living longer lives, the CDC estimates that 4 in 10 of those adults have disabilities and worse outcomes than those with heart defects alone. The investigators found that patients with disabilities were also at higher risk of being lost in the transition from pediatric to adult healthcare. Some adolescent patients with CHD and their families fear the transition to adult healthcare more than open heart surgery. Interventions to improve access for these high-risk patients are urgently needed. Additionally, half of patients face disabilities in their lifetime and are more likely to require emergency surgical procedures, be admitted to intensive care, and die prematurely. So, while CHD affects 1% of the population, it represents more than 10% of healthcare expenditures in the United States. This disparity must be addressed to improve healthcare transition for all patients, up to 63% of whom disengage from cardiac care as adults. 83% of CHD patients experience communication, mobility, and psychosocial complications not accounted for in existing transition tools. Accessible care is useable by the greatest number of people but is specifically designed for those with physical, sensory, and cognitive disabilities, and fewer high-risk patients will be lost if the individual, health, and community factors that make care accessible are addressed. Patients find themselves in a disability-health paradox: aging into a system of care not designed for them. Reducing the burden of CHD transition without addressing disability reinforces outcome disparities.
This study involves:
On-Study Procedures
Adaptive Transition Education Procedures
Unstructured and semi-structured interviews
Clinical Database Review
Study Aims:
Inclusion Criteria (Patient Participants):
Exclusion Criteria:
ccallen@pediatrics.wisc.edu(608) 263-9783