Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The primary aim of this research is to compare the efficacy of conservative treatment versus surgical treatment for Gartland type II supracondylar humerus fractures in children. The comparison focuses on assessing differences in clinical outcomes functional recovery times, and complication rates between the two treatment groups.
Supracondylar Humerus Fractures are the most common type of elbow fracture in children, typically occurring between the ages of five and seven. These injuries are critical due to their proximity to major neurovascular structures, making prompt and appropriate management essential to prevent severe complications. The vast majority (approximately 98%) of SCHFs are extension-type injuries, resulting from a fall onto an outstretched hand with the elbow hyperextended.
Classification: The Gartland System The classification is based on the degree of displacement of the distal fragment relative to the proximal fragment, as seen on a lateral radiograph.
Type I stable, nondisplaced fractures are managed non-operatively.
Type III and IV are highly unstable fractures that require urgent intervention to achieve and maintain reduction .
Treatment: Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning (CRPP) is the mainstay of treatment .Open reduction may be necessary if closed reduction fails or if there is a vascular compromise requiring exploration.
•Goal: Anatomical reduction and stable fixation to prevent malunion and neurovascular complications.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative treatment | Experimental | Children with Gartland type II supracondylar humeral fractures will be treated conservatively using closed reduction followed by immobilization in an above-elbow cast . Patients will be followed up clinically and radiologically at regular intervals to assess fracture alignment, healing, and functional outcomes. |
|
| Surgical treatment group | Experimental | Children will undergo surgical treatment via Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning under general anesthesia. Postoperative follow-up will include clinical and radiological assessment of fracture healing, alignment, and complications. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative treatment by casting | Other | Closed reduction of Gartland type II supracondylar humeral fracture under appropriate analgesia or anesthesia, followed by immobilization using an above-elbow cast. Patients will undergo regular clinical and radiographic follow-up to monitor fracture alignment, healing, and functional recovery. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Functional outcome assessed by Modified Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score | Functional outcome will be evaluated using the Modified QuickDASH questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater disability. | 1 year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Elbow flexion range of motion (degrees) | Measured in degrees using a goniometer to assess maximum elbow flexion. | 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-intervention |
| Elbow extension range of motion (degrees) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006810 | Humeral Fractures |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001134 | Arm Injuries |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
| D050723 | Fractures, Bone |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| surgical treatment via percutaneous pinning UGA | Procedure | surgical treatment vis Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning under general anesthesia. Postoperative care includes clinical and radiographic follow-up to assess fracture healing, alignment, and potential complications. |
|
Measured in degrees using a goniometer to assess maximum elbow extension.
| 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-intervention |
| Pain assessed using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | Pain is measured on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates worst possible pain. | 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-intervention |
| Baumann angle (degrees) | Measured on standard anteroposterior elbow radiographs to assess coronal alignment. | Immediately post-reduction and at 6 months |
| Anterior humeral line alignment (normal/abnormal) | Assessed on lateral elbow radiographs to evaluate sagittal alignment. | Immediately post-reduction and at 6 months |
| Loss of reduction (yes/no) | Defined as displacement of fracture fragments on follow-up radiographs. | Up to 6 months post-intervention |
| Incidence of nerve injury (yes/no) | Includes any documented motor or sensory nerve deficit following treatment. | Up to 6 months post-intervention |
| Incidence of infection (yes/no) | Includes superficial or deep infection related to treatment. | Up to 6 months post-intervention |