Super Large Bore Catheter Aspiration Versus Stent Retriever Thrombectomy as First Line Technique for Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Super Large Bore Catheter Aspiration Versus Stent Retriever Thrombectomy as First Line Technique for Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke
This is a multicenter, open-label, blinded-endpoint, randomized controlled trial comparing super large bore catheter aspiration versus stent retriever thrombectomy as the first-line technique for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion in acute ischemic stroke. Eligible patients with acute ischemic stroke due to internal carotid artery intracranial segment and/or middle cerebral artery M1 occlusion will be randomized 1:1 to receive either aspiration using a super large bore catheter (inner diameter ≥0.080 inch) or stent retriever thrombectomy (allowing balloon guiding catheters or intermediate catheters with inner diameter <0.080 inch). The primary outcome is the ordinal modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days post-procedure. Key secondary outcomes include the proportion of patients with mRS 0-2 at 90 days, change in NIHSS at 24 hours and 7 days, and various angiographic and safety endpoints. The trial plans to enroll 708 patients across approximately 30 centers in China. The total study duration is 24-36 months, with each patient participating for 3 months.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
zhuyueqi@sjtu.edu.cn18930173115
jiangshandeng@sjtu.edu.cn18817822181