Osseo-densification Versus Conventional Drilling for Dental Implant Placement: A Double-Blinded Randomized Split-Mouth Clinical Trial
Osseo-densification Versus Conventional Drilling for Dental Implant Placement: A Double-Blinded Randomized Split-Mouth Clinical Trial
Primary implant stability and bone preservation are critical determinants of successful osseointegration, particularly in sites with low bone density. Conventional drilling removes bone and may reduce stability, whereas osseo-densification is a non-subtractive technique that compacts bone to enhance its density and strength.
Objective:
To compare osseo-densification and conventional drilling techniques in terms of implant primary stability, peri-implant bone density, and marginal bone loss during early healing.
Methods:
A double-blinded, randomized split-mouth clinical trial was conducted on eight participants requiring bilateral maxillary implants (n = 16 sites). Each patient received one implant using the osseo-densification technique (Densah burs, counterclockwise mode) and one using conventional sequential drilling. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was used to evaluate bone density and marginal bone levels at baseline, three, and six-months post-placement. Implant stability was measured immediately after insertion using resonance frequency analysis (Osstell ISQ). Data were analysed using t-tests and repeated-measures ANOVA (p < 0.05).
Inclusion Criteria:
• Systemically and medically healthy adults (>18 years old) of either sex.
Exclusion Criteria:
• Systemic medical conditions that could compromise surgical healing or osseointegration (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes mellitus).