Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Universitat Politècnica de València | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This observational cross-sectional study evaluates and compares healthcare professionals' perceptions of key domains of home-based palliative care. Using an anonymous online survey and multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods, the study explores perceived importance, strategic prioritization, and self-assessed performance across five core palliative care domains. The study is conducted across Hospital-at-Home units throughout the Valencian Community (Spain).
MULTIPAL is an observational, analytical, cross-sectional census survey designed to assess healthcare professionals' perceptions of home-based palliative care within Hospital-at-Home units. The study is grounded in international palliative care frameworks, including those promoted by the World Health Organization, which define palliative care as a multidimensional approach encompassing symptom control, psychosocial and spiritual care, communication, coordination, and professional well-being.
Differences in professional priorities may influence clinical decision-making, coordination, and care quality. Despite increasing attention to palliative care quality indicators, professionals' perspectives-particularly in home-based settings-remain underexplored.
The study applies complementary Multicriteria Decision Analysis methods (TOPSIS, PROMETHEE, Analytic Hierarchy Process) to evaluate and compare professional priorities across five predefined domains: symptom control; communication and shared decision-making; psychosocial and spiritual care; coordination and continuity of care; and support for healthcare professionals.
Initially conceived as a single-center study, MULTIPAL was expanded to all Hospital-at-Home units in the Valencian Community to enhance representativeness, external validity, and relevance for system-level quality improvement.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Healthcare professionals in Hospital-at-Home units | Healthcare professionals with direct clinical responsibilities in Hospital-at-Home units providing home-based palliative care within the Valencian Community. Participants complete an anonymous cross-sectional survey assessing perceptions and prioritization of key domains of palliative care. |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Multicriteria prioritization of home-based palliative care domains (TOPSIS) | Relative prioritization of five predefined domains of home-based palliative care based on healthcare professionals' perceived importance and performance (symptom control; communication and shared decision-making; psychosocial and spiritual care; coordination and continuity of care; and support for healthcare professionals) . Measure: TOPSIS closeness coefficient for each domain . Unit of Measure: Closeness coefficient (0-1). Measurement Tool / Method: Multicriteria Decision Analysis using the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). | Baseline (single cross-sectional survey) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| 2. Preference-based ranking of palliative care domains (PROMETHEE) | Preference-based ranking of palliative care domains according to healthcare professionals' judgments: symptom control; communication and shared decision-making; psychosocial and spiritual care; coordination and continuity of care; and support for healthcare professionals. Measure: Net preference flow for each domain. Unit of Measure: Net preference flow score. Measurement Tool / Method: Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE). |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The survey will be addressed to healthcare professionals working in Hospital-at-Home units across the Valencian Community (Spain). Eligible participants will be professionals with direct clinical responsibilities in the care of patients and families receiving home-based palliative care.
The following professional profiles will be included:
Physicians Nursing assistants Nurse case managers (including those involved in remote monitoring and disease management) Clinical psychologists Social workers Physiotherapists
Professionals who do not have direct clinical or care-related responsibilities, such as administrative staff or other non-clinical support personnel within Hospital-at-Home units, will be excluded from the study.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Vicente Ruiz Garcia | Hospital at Home Unit - Hospital UiP La Fe, Valencia, Spain | Principal Investigator |
| Elisa Soriano Melchor, MD, PhD | Hospital at Home Unit - Hospital UiP La Fe, Valencia, Spain | Study Chair |
| Alberto Muñoz Cano, MD, PhD | Hospital at Home Unit - Hospital UiP La Fe, Valencia, Spain | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe | Valencia | Valencia | 46026 | Spain |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 34166149 | Background | Khan I, Pintelon L, Martin H. The Application of Multicriteria Decision Analysis Methods in Health Care: A Literature Review. Med Decis Making. 2022 Feb;42(2):262-274. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211019040. Epub 2021 Jun 24. | |
| 30382826 | Background | Frazao TDC, Camilo DGG, Cabral ELS, Souza RP. Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) in health care: a systematic review of the main characteristics and methodological steps. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Nov 1;18(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0663-1. |
Not provided
Not provided
Aggregated and fully anonymized data will be shared with all participating Hospital-at-Home units as part of a structured feedback and quality improvement process.
Study results and aggregated datasets will also be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications in journals focused on palliative care and health services research.
Shared data will include anonymized MCDA-derived summary scores and rankings (TOPSIS, PROMETHEE, AHP). No individual-level identifiable data will be shared.
Time Frame: Data sharing will begin after completion of data analysis and primary dissemination of results.
Access Criteria: Data will be shared upon reasonable request for academic, educational, or quality improvement purposes, in accordance with institutional data protection policies.
De-identified and aggregated data will become available after completion of data analysis and publication of the main study results, expected within 6 months after study completion. Data will remain available for a minimum period of 5 years following initial dissemination, in accordance with institutional data retention policies
Access to the shared data will be granted to investigators from participating Hospital-at-Home units within the Valencian Community and to qualified researchers who submit a reasonable request. Shared data will consist of aggregated and fully de-identified datasets, including multicriteria decision analysis outputs (TOPSIS, PROMETHEE, AHP summary scores), descriptive subgroup analyses, and supporting documentation (e.g., data dictionary).
Requests for access will be reviewed by the study investigators. Data will be provided exclusively for academic research, quality improvement, or educational purposes, and users may be required to agree to conditions of use that prohibit re-identification attempts and unauthorized redistribution.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Baseline (single cross-sectional survey) |
| 3. Hierarchical weighting and consistency of each domain importance (AHP) | Assessment of relative importance and internal consistency of professional judgments for the following domains: symptom control; communication and shared decision-making; psychosocial and spiritual care; coordination and continuity of care; and support for healthcare professionals. Measure: Normalized priority weights and consistency ratio. Unit of Measure: Dimensionless. Measurement Tool / Method: Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). At survey completion. | Baseline (single cross-sectional survey) |
| 4. Interprofessional consensus on domain prioritization | Degree of agreement between professional groups regarding domain priorities. Measure: Absolute difference in ranking positions. Unit of Measure: Rank difference. Measurement Tool / Method: Comparison of TOPSIS-derived rankings between groups. At survey completion. | Baseline (single cross-sectional survey) |
| 5. Importance-performance gap in palliative care domains | Difference between perceived importance and perceived performance for each domain. Measure: Importance-performance gap score. Unit of Measure: Likert-scale score difference. Measurement Tool / Method: Direct calculation from survey ratings. | Baseline (single cross-sectional survey) |
| Variation in domain prioritization by professional and experiential factors | Exploratory differences in priorities according to professional role, experience, age, and gender. Measure: Differences in MCDA-derived scores. Unit of Measure: Method-specific. Measurement Tool / Method: Subgroup analyses using TOPSIS, PROMETHEE, and AHP estimators. | Baseline (single cross-sectional survey) |
| 40346520 | Background | Refolo P, Raimondi C, Masilla SS, Argo A, Capulli E, Ceruti S, Gonella S, Ingravallo F, Miccinesi G, Picozzi M, Redaelli P, Spagnolo AG. Attitudes of physicians, nurses, and the general public toward End-of-Life (EoL) decisions in European countries: an umbrella review. BMC Med Ethics. 2025 May 9;26(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01219-z. |
| 23866928 | Background | Van Beek K, Woitha K, Ahmed N, Menten J, Jaspers B, Engels Y, Ahmedzai SH, Vissers K, Hasselaar J. Comparison of legislation, regulations and national health strategies for palliative care in seven European countries (Results from the Europall Research Group): a descriptive study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Jul 17;13:275. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-275. |
| 26485612 | Background | Pastrana T, Wenk R, De Lima L. Consensus-Based Palliative Care Competencies for Undergraduate Nurses and Physicians: A Demonstrative Process with Colombian Universities. J Palliat Med. 2016 Jan;19(1):76-82. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2015.0202. Epub 2015 Oct 20. |
| 23809769 | Background | De Roo ML, Leemans K, Claessen SJ, Cohen J, Pasman HR, Deliens L, Francke AL; EURO IMPACT. Quality indicators for palliative care: update of a systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Oct;46(4):556-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.09.013. Epub 2013 Jun 26. |
| 30277572 | Background | Hui D, Hannon BL, Zimmermann C, Bruera E. Improving patient and caregiver outcomes in oncology: Team-based, timely, and targeted palliative care. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Sep;68(5):356-376. doi: 10.3322/caac.21490. Epub 2018 Sep 13. |
| 29157932 | Background | Blay C, Martori JC, Limon E, Oller R, Vila L, Gomez-Batiste X. [Find your 1%: prevalence and mortality of a community cohort of people with advanced chronic disease and palliative needs]. Aten Primaria. 2019 Feb;51(2):71-79. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Nov 20. Spanish. |
| 21496971 | Background | Vega T, Arrieta E, Lozano JE, Miralles M, Anes Y, Gomez C, Quinones C, Perucha M, Margolles M, Gomez de Caso JA, Gil M, Fernandez S, de la Iglesia P, Lopez A, Alamo R, Zurriaga O, Mauro Ramos J; por el Grupo RECENT. [Palliative and support care at home in primary care]. Gac Sanit. 2011 May-Jun;25(3):205-10. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2011.02.005. Epub 2011 Apr 14. Spanish. |
| 30256135 | Background | Centeno C, Sitte T, de Lima L, Alsirafy S, Bruera E, Callaway M, Foley K, Luyirika E, Mosoiu D, Pettus K, Puchalski C, Rajagopal MR, Yong J, Garralda E, Rhee JY, Comoretto N. White Paper for Global Palliative Care Advocacy: Recommendations from a PAL-LIFE Expert Advisory Group of the Pontifical Academy for Life, Vatican City. J Palliat Med. 2018 Oct;21(10):1389-1397. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0248. Epub 2018 Sep 26. |