Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| South Egypt Cancer Institute | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The primary outcome is to compare the hemodynamic outcomes ( e.g SV , CO and CI ) using The ICON of two different modes of ventilation ( VCV and PC-VG ) during laparoscopic abdominal cancer surgeries with exaggerated trendelenburg position.
And the secondary outcomes is to compare the respiratory effects ( e.g atelectasis development , plateau pressure(Pplat) , peak inspiratory pressure(PIP) , dyn. compliance and postoperative inflammatory indicators e.g CRP and WBCs ) of two different modes of ventilation ( VCV and PC-VG ) during laparoscopic abdominal cancer surgeries with exaggerated trendelenburg position.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Volume controlled ventilation ( VCV ) | Experimental |
| |
| Pressure-controlled ventilation-volume guaranteed (PCV-VG) | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| electrical cardiometry ('ICON CARDIOTRONIC, OSYPKA MEDICAL') , Lung ultrasonography (LUS) for atelectasis | Diagnostic Test | electrical cardiometry estimates cardiac parameters by measuring changes in thoracic electrical bioimpedance during the cardiac cycle. The ICON, using four electrocardiogram (ECG) electrodes, estimates the maximum rate of change of impedance to peak aortic blood acceleration based on the principle that red blood cells change from random orientation during diastole (high impedance) to an aligned state during systole (low impedance). This device estimates CO, cardiac index (CI), stroke volume (SV), systemic vascular resistance (SVR), and a variety of other cardiac parameters ... Lung ultrasonography (LUS) in patients who are under anesthesia and scheduled for surgery can detect intraoperative atelectasis, and the LUS score is correlated with perioperative oxygenation impairment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Is to compare the hemodynamic outcomes mainly cardiac output ( CO) using The ICON of two different modes of ventilation ( VCV and PC-VG ) during laparoscopic abdominal cancer surgeries. | One year to one and half years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To compare the respiratory effects effects including atelectasis development of two different modes of ventilation ( VCV and PC-VG ) during laparoscopic abdominal cancer surgeries. | One to two years | |
| To compare the respiratory effects including dynamic compliance of two different modes of ventilation ( VCV and PC-VG ) during laparoscopic abdominal cancer surgeries. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
1 - All patients who will be scheduled for elective laparoscopic abdominal cancer surgeries 2- patients aged 20-80 years 3- patients have an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II
Exclusion Criteria:
1 - Patients with severe systemic disease (history of myocardial infarction, chronic obstructive, or restrictive lung disease) 2- Obese patients (BMI > 30) 3- patients with neurologic or neuromuscular diseases.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saif eldeen Gamal Khalaf, Assistant lecturer | Contact | +20-1033893202 | saifeldeen616@gmail.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| South Egypt cancer institute , Assiut university | Recruiting | Asyut | Egypt |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background | Bernstein DP, Osypka MJ (2003) Apparatus and method for determining an approximation of the stroke volume and the cardiac output of the heart. Google Patents. | ||
| Background | Osypka M. An introduction to electrical cardiometry 2009; 49 1-10. Osypka Medical GmbH. | ||
| 33991554 | Background | Yilmaz H, Kazbek BK, Koksoy UC, Gul AM, Ekmekci P, Caglar GS, Tuzuner F. Hemodynamic outcome of different ventilation modes in laparoscopic surgery with exaggerated trendelenburg: a randomised controlled trial. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2022 Jan-Feb;72(1):88-94. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2021.04.028. Epub 2021 May 12. | |
| 17695343 |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Related Info | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| One and half years |
| To compare the respiratory effects including plateau pressure (Pplat) of two different modes of ventilation ( VCV and PC-VG ) during laparoscopic abdominal cancer surgeries. | One and half years |
| To compare the respiratory effects including peak inspiratory pressure ( PIP) of two different modes of ventilation ( VCV and PC-VG ) during laparoscopic abdominal cancer surgeries. | One and half years |
| To compare postoperative inflammatory indicators e.g CRP , WBCs of two different modes of ventilation ( VCV and PC-VG ) during laparoscopic abdominal cancer surgeries. | One and half years |
| Background |
| Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146. |
| 27687346 | Background | Assad OM, El Sayed AA, Khalil MA. Comparison of volume-controlled ventilation and pressure-controlled ventilation volume guaranteed during laparoscopic surgery in Trendelenburg position. J Clin Anesth. 2016 Nov;34:55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.03.053. Epub 2016 May 2. |
| 28216699 | Background | Jaju R, Jaju PB, Dubey M, Mohammad S, Bhargava AK. Comparison of volume controlled ventilation and pressure controlled ventilation in patients undergoing robot-assisted pelvic surgeries: An open-label trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2017 Jan;61(1):17-23. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.198406. |
| 33808607 | Background | Schick V, Dusse F, Eckardt R, Kerkhoff S, Commotio S, Hinkelbein J, Mathes A. Comparison of Volume-Guaranteed or -Targeted, Pressure-Controlled Ventilation with Volume-Controlled Ventilation during Elective Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2021 Mar 19;10(6):1276. doi: 10.3390/jcm10061276. |
| 20303833 | Background | Ogurlu M, Kucuk M, Bilgin F, Sizlan A, Yanarates O, Eksert S, Karasahin E, Cosar A. Pressure-controlled vs volume-controlled ventilation during laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 May-Jun;17(3):295-300. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.10.007. Epub 2010 Mar 19. |
| 24916144 | Background | Cote CJ, Sui J, Anderson TA, Bhattacharya ST, Shank ES, Tuason PM, August DA, Zibaitis A, Firth PG, Fuzaylov G, Leeman MR, Mai CL, Roberts JD Jr. Continuous noninvasive cardiac output in children: is this the next generation of operating room monitors? Initial experience in 402 pediatric patients. Paediatr Anaesth. 2015 Feb;25(2):150-9. doi: 10.1111/pan.12441. Epub 2014 Jun 10. |
| 23450539 | Background | Rajaram SS, Desai NK, Kalra A, Gajera M, Cavanaugh SK, Brampton W, Young D, Harvey S, Rowan K. Pulmonary artery catheters for adult patients in intensive care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28;2013(2):CD003408. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003408.pub3. |
| 29621027 | Background | Saugel B, Vincent JL. Cardiac output monitoring: how to choose the optimal method for the individual patient. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2018 Jun;24(3):165-172. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000492. |
| 29725695 | Background | De Backer D, Bakker J, Cecconi M, Hajjar L, Liu DW, Lobo S, Monnet X, Morelli A, Myatra SN, Perel A, Pinsky MR, Saugel B, Teboul JL, Vieillard-Baron A, Vincent JL. Alternatives to the Swan-Ganz catheter. Intensive Care Med. 2018 Jun;44(6):730-741. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5187-8. Epub 2018 May 3. |
| Background | Patil S, Koyyalamudi P, Robertson C, et al. Physiologic effects of pneumoperitoneum and positioning. In: Kaye A, Urman R, editors. Perioperative management in robotic surgery. |
| 29557671 | Background | Rouby JJ, Arbelot C, Gao Y, Zhang M, Lv J, An Y, Chunyao W, Bin D, Valente Barbas CS, Dexheimer Neto FL, Prior Caltabeloti F, Lima E, Cebey A, Perbet S, Constantin JM; APECHO Study Group. Training for Lung Ultrasound Score Measurement in Critically Ill Patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Aug 1;198(3):398-401. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201802-0227LE. No abstract available. |
| 27828799 | Background | Ford JW, Heiberg J, Brennan AP, Royse CF, Canty DJ, El-Ansary D, Royse AG. A Pilot Assessment of 3 Point-of-Care Strategies for Diagnosis of Perioperative Lung Pathology. Anesth Analg. 2017 Mar;124(3):734-742. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001726. |
| 26020123 | Background | Canet J, Sabate S, Mazo V, Gallart L, de Abreu MG, Belda J, Langeron O, Hoeft A, Pelosi P; PERISCOPE group. Development and validation of a score to predict postoperative respiratory failure in a multicentre European cohort: A prospective, observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Jul;32(7):458-70. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000223. |
| 29939851 | Background | Arvizo C, Mehta ST, Yunker A. Adverse events related to Trendelenburg position during laparoscopic surgery: recommendations and review of the literature. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Aug;30(4):272-278. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000471. |
| 33510568 | Background | St John A, Caturegli I, Kubicki NS, Kavic SM. The Rise of Minimally Invasive Surgery: 16 Year Analysis of the Progressive Replacement of Open Surgery with Laparoscopy. JSLS. 2020 Oct-Dec;24(4):e2020.00076. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00076. |