Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aims to compare the trueness and precision of three impression methodologies photogrammetry, digital intraoral scanning with splinted scan bodies, and conventional open tray impressions in the context of the All-on-X treatment concept. This will provide valuable evidence for clinicians considering digital workflows for implant-supported prostheses. Does the use of photogrammetry and digital impression techniques with splinted scan bodies result in improved accuracy in implant position transfer in the All-on-X concept compared to conventional open tray impressions?
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| photogrammetry based full-arch impression | Experimental |
| |
| Digital impression using splinted scan bodies | Experimental |
| |
| conventional open tray implant impression | Active Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| photogrammetry based full arch impression | Device | use of photogrammetry system to capture the positions of All on X implants digitally without physical impression material. This technique aims to achieve precise measurements and increase patient satisfaction |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy measured using 3D inspection software (Geomagic Control X). | Immediately after measurements taking |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL), assessed using standardized questionnaires. | immediately after measurements taking |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| hadeer Ali, teaching assistant | Contact | 01143252442 | hadeeralisoliman5@gmail.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| October 6 University | Giza | Egypt |
|
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37241002 | Background | Drancourt N, Auduc C, Mouget A, Mouminoux J, Auroy P, Veyrune JL, El Osta N, Nicolas E. Accuracy of Conventional and Digital Impressions for Full-Arch Implant-Supported Prostheses: An In Vitro Study. J Pers Med. 2023 May 15;13(5):832. doi: 10.3390/jpm13050832. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Digital Impression Using Splinted Scan Bodies | Device | Digital full-arch impression using splinted scan bodies connected with resin to enhance stability. An intraoral scanner captures the splinted assembly for framework fabrication. Accuracy and patient satisfaction will be evaluated. |
|
| Conventional Open-Tray Implant Impression | Procedure | Traditional full-arch open-tray impression using polyether or VPS material with splinted impression copings. This serves as the standard comparator for evaluating accuracy and patient satisfaction. |
|